Dave Sill writes:
That's why I prefer to install qmail from the directions in
INSTALL. Sure, the rpm's make it easier to *install*, but, IMHO, they
make it harder to *maintain* since you don't know exactly what they
did.
Yes you do.
rpm -q -l -vv $PACKAGE
--
Sam
Pike wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:38:12PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Before installing, do:
# mkdir /var/qmail /etc/qmail
# ln -s /etc/qmail /var/qmail/control
# mkdir /usr/doc/qmail
# ln -s /usr/doc/qmail /var/qmail/doc
# ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail
ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail/bin, I
"Sam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I prefer to install qmail from the directions in
INSTALL. Sure, the rpm's make it easier to *install*, but, IMHO, they
make it harder to *maintain* since you don't know exactly what they
did.
Yes you do.
rpm -q -l -vv $PACKAGE
That only tells you
Hi
That was my original complaint ... the qmail rpm swoops itself all over
your fs symlinking every possible place where someone would possibly look
for it.
I haven't installed from RPM so I may be wrong, but surely there are only two
locations for each file, one in the FSSTND location and
On Wed 1999-04-28 (20:31), Pike wrote:
Hi
That was my original complaint ... the qmail rpm swoops itself all over
your fs symlinking every possible place where someone would possibly look
for it.
I haven't installed from RPM so I may be wrong, but surely there are only two
locations
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 20:31:32 +0200, Pike wrote:
Overall conclusion: _don't_use_the_rpm_to_install_qmail_
At least, not my build, which was done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry david.
Overall conclusion: If you can do it better and you care about it,
don't use rpm. If you can't do it better or you
