relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Dan Egli
I am quite a new Qmail user, and so I'm looking for some help here. We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Chris Johnson
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire unix

RE: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Dan Egli
: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:17 AM To: Dan Egli Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: relay controls On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: [snip] I have a tcprules file the directory it appears my predecessor left the setup files in, and acording to the runline in PS (I still cannot find where he is actually launching tcpserver for smtp but it is running) the file should

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread 'Chris Johnson'
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE! You should try reading

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: This file does exist, and it is readable, containing the following rule: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 209.254.33.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" yet if I jump onto a machine that is not in these rules, and I telnet into port 25, I can setup a

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Charles Cazabon
Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire unix life). Post the output of

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Mark Delany
efficiently. Regards. -Original Message- From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:17 AM To: Dan Egli Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: relay controls On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: We have a QMAIL

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE! You are not

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE! So what? qmail has no

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread Charles Cazabon
Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE! You're suffering from a common misunderstanding.

Re: relay controls

2001-01-25 Thread paul
see also 'morercpthosts'. 'Chris Johnson' writes: On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote: rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to any domain in existance. such a