* Ramzi S. Abdallah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000924 23:47]:
We have migrated from sendmail to qmail however we kept the sendmail
alias file and majordomo. Is anyone aware of any configuration that
works with our setup? all Majordomo aliases are stored in the alias
file.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Olivier
--
_
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Depends on whether you actually consider this an "improvement" as opposed to
an invasion of privacy.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna [EMAIL
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Robin S. Socha wrote:
And would you kindly restrict your line width to something ~72
characters? Thanks.
oh, please... please publically flame me too!
Scott
On Fre, 22 Sep 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:34:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I post the output of qmail-showctl?
And give us a syscall trace of qmail inject, it's only 44 lines of output
on a Solaris box.
So, here we go:
"Olivier M." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just tried to use it with AVP and sweep : both returns a
X-Qmail-Scanner-0.90: corrupt scanner/resource problems - exit status 256
in the logfile...
If you are using qmail-scanner, could you please tell me which
program is working well, and if is
qmail Digest 25 Sep 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1134
Topics (messages 49328 through 49357):
Transforming a FROM address..
49328 by: Petricevich, Paul
49329 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: dotqmail scripting
49330 by: Magnus Bodin
49337 by: Raul Miller
Question about
Hello,
I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin. What I am trying to do is to set up an email account [EMAIL PROTECTED] so when it receives a new mail, it extracts the subject and forwards it to another mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mail to sms gateway).
I have a .qmail-user file with the
Hi there,
We run qmail on a box behind a firewall,
another, lower priority, external smtp server knows it's way
through and can deliver to our machine,
bounces however
go to the return adress, and double
bounce.
The DNS MX priority is 10 for the machine behind the
firewall, and 20
Hello,
I need to manage one virtual-domains (domain1.com) in this way:
1) All the accounts *master (postmaster,hostmaster,webmaster,...)
redirect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No problem with .qmail-postmaster, etc)
2) Any other account (mike, support, ..etc) route via 'smtproutes' to a
specific host
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:50:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
write(1, "to: koch\n", 9) = 9
munmap(0x40018000, 4096)= 0
_exit(0)= ?
qmail-inject: fatal: qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0)
Ok, so this is happening on the
qmail-mrtg.1.0 gives me:
/usr/local/mrtg-2/bin/mrtg qmail.mrtg.cfg
) in CFG file (qmail.mrtg.cfg) does not make sense
I cannot claim to be an mrtg expert (au contraire, I don't understand it
at all), but I've nuked all ")" in this file for good measure and that
does not change anything,
running qmail 1.03 on redhat 6.2.
im getting these lock file errors:
supervise fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure
supervise fatal: unable to acquire qmail/send/supervise/lock: temporary
failure
supervise fatal: unable to acquire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock: temporary
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
No, because DSN is not an improvement. It's a bug. It is a misdesigned
fix for a problem that can be solved much better with VERP.
Greetz,
* Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 09:03]:
qmail-mrtg.1.0 gives me:
/usr/local/mrtg-2/bin/mrtg qmail.mrtg.cfg
) in CFG file (qmail.mrtg.cfg) does not make sense
I cannot claim to be an mrtg expert (au contraire, I don't understand it
at all), but I've nuked all ")" in this file
also sprach rsocha:
* Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 09:03]:
I've got this working with 2.8.12;
I cannot compile qmail-mrtg under OpenBSD 2.7:
(root@purgatory):(/usr/local/src/Qmail/qmail-mrtg.1.0)# gcc --version
2.95.2
(root@purgatory):(/usr/local/src/Qmail/qmail-mrtg.1.0)# gcc
"Edward Carr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are my config files ... Edited for anonymity ...
/var/qmail/control/defaultdomain:
domain.net
Gimme a break...
/etc/init.d/qmail:
snip!
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x
Eric Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Samuel wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Eric Cox wrote:
Mail is delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~alias/.qmail-user1 contains:
|script that writes a username into ~alias/.qmail-user2
user2
It would work but it's a woefully inefficient way to
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
[ed. (Postfix now uses notifications as per RFC 1894) -- because of long
Subject: ]
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
Depends on whether you actually consider this an
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ? Someone told me changes
of my disks dying with constat disk activity are
much higher!
regards
--Frans
"Mark Lo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my startup script in /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file are as follows:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -u qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-u
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Frans Haarman wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ? Someone told me changes
of my disks dying with constat disk activity are
much higher!
Funny you mentioned that. I just noticed the same thing! The HD
Hi,
I currently use qmail + ldap + qmail-pop3d very intensively using NRG4U
patch.
I'd like, however, to open an IMAP access to my server.
Does anyone have IMAP+LDAP solutions ?
Thanks,
P.-J.
I just wanted to see what your opinions are on converting a virtual domain
to vpopmail.
I while back I was given the task of setting up a virtual domain, we'll call
virtual.domain.com. I was fairly new to Qmail, so this is what I did.
Created a unix account 'virtual'.
For each 'user' in
J.J.Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 25 September 2000 at 14:41:22 +0200
Hello,
I need to manage one virtual-domains (domain1.com) in this way:
1) All the accounts *master (postmaster,hostmaster,webmaster,...)
redirect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No problem with .qmail-postmaster, etc)
Peter van Dijk wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 09:34:27AM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
As seen on freshmeat.net this morning...
Any chance so see such improvments to qmail comming?
No, because DSN is not an improvement. It's a bug. It is a misdesigned
fix for a problem that can be solved
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as well as VERP, but it tries to establish a standard way to
communicate between MTAs and MUAs about whether a
David Dyer-Bennet escribió:
I see two approaches.
#1, can you use smtproutes to send everything to the other machine, and then
on *that* machine grab the *master accounts and forward them back?
With this option my boss can kill me. He doesn't aprobe that one mail can go
out and come back
"J.J.Gallardo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to manage one virtual-domains (domain1.com) in this way:
1) All the accounts *master (postmaster,hostmaster,webmaster,...)
redirect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No problem with .qmail-postmaster, etc)
2) Any other account (mike, support, ..etc) route via
* Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 09:46]:
also sprach rsocha:
* Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 09:03]:
I've got this working with 2.8.12;
I cannot compile qmail-mrtg under OpenBSD 2.7:
Ick, *really* sloppy programming by the author. He used strncmp (``compare
the first N
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny you mentioned that. I just noticed the same thing! The HD activity
light blips every one or two seconds. I restarted the box without loading
svscan (which loads dnscache, tinydns and qmail) - all is quiet.
svscan polls the service directory every five seconds.
"Frans Haarman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ?
Yeah, the same way running your car's engine is bad for it. If you
want your disk drive to last forever, you'll need to power it off. :-)
Someone told me
Martin Lesser wrote:
Just tried to use it with AVP and sweep : both returns a
X-Qmail-Scanner-0.90: corrupt scanner/resource problems - exit status 256
in the logfile...
If you are using qmail-scanner, could you please tell me which
program is working well, and if is free ? Thanks
Doug Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone replied but somehow I've lost the email...
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/09/msg01488.html
I'm sending from host1 direct to host2's SMTP server ie
from host1 - dougb-$i@host2
How? Your script on host1 talks SMTP directly
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as well as VERP, but it tries to
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look. If that touches your disk each time, your OS
sucks or
Hello
Im trying to setup an Autoresponder and it does not work
I add this line into my .qmail-crusstars
And then my mail does not get delivered to the email box and no auto
responder.
| /usr/local/bin/autorespond 1 20 crusstars autolog
Is this the right way to setup autoresonder or are
By far most double bounces I see are spam with bogus return addresses
listed for old email addresses here. Those I ignore. Some are for broken
list servers, some of which don't accept bounce messages. Sometimes I
write filter rules for those to forward future crap to their postmaster
and list
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
Basically it tries to solve issues that VERP does not. It doesn't solve the
bouncing issue as
Hello
Im trying to setup an Autoresponder and it does not work
I add this line into my .qmail-crusstars
And then my mail does not get delivered to the email box and no auto
responder.
| /usr/local/bin/autorespond 1 20 crusstars autolog
Is this the right way to setup autoresonder or are
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail file, to report
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
It is possible that the programs being spawned are exiting, in which
case supervise will start another copy. This could be due to any
number of things. For
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
[response]:
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:33:21PM +0200,
Frans Haarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
Is this bad for my hd ? Someone told me changes
of my disks dying with constat disk activity are
much higher!
If they are making noise
Is there anyone that can help us out?
Thanks
Mike
Subject:
RE: Auto Responder
Date:
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:04:27 -0400
From:
"Solapurkar, Sudheer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
"'Mike Jimenez'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mike,
If you successfully resolve this, can
Hi everyone,
I'm using qmail and POP3 and Unix.
I'don't know how can I' install qmail-autoresponder!
Please help me:)
Allama.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
I don't.
Get yourself a real operating system where the disk cache actually
works. svscan does read-only accesses to /services or wherever you
configured it to look.
hi,
Does anyone have IMAP+LDAP solutions ?
try http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/
;) a
==
Alexander Jernejcic
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin LOVE-LETTER-UND-NIX-DAZUGELERNT.txt.vbs
I am a Signature, not a Virus!
end
Hy there palls
i'm new to qmail, and you can find this stupid, but anyway there it
goes.
I've sucessfuly installed qmail. it is running properly, and i can send
mail trough the host. but when i try to receive mail (pop3) the problems
begin.
when i initialize the qmail-pop3d it gives me the
Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im trying to setup an Autoresponder and it does not work
I add this line into my .qmail-crusstars
And then my mail does not get delivered to the email box and no auto
responder.
| /usr/local/bin/autorespond 1 20 crusstars autolog
Is this the right way
* Mike Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000925 15:04]:
Is there anyone that can help us out?
I use http://qmail.wwwservice.to/autoreply_1.1.tar.gz and it works. Nice
webinterface, too.
*clicketyclick*
http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-autoresponder/current/qmail-autoresponder-0.93.tar.gz
works, too.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 10:12:24AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
"Wagner R. Landgraf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody can tell me how to completely qmail from Linux system, so I
can be sure that it's not there anymore?
rm -rf /var/qmail
Note: this will not
- put sendmail back,
- remove the
Hy there palls
i'm new to qmail, and you can find this stupid, but anyway there it
goes.
I've sucessfuly installed qmail. it is running properly, and i can send
mail trough the host. but when i try to receive mail (pop3) the problems
begin.
when i initialize the qmail-pop3d it gives me the
J.J.Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 25 September 2000 at 18:41:18 +0200
David Dyer-Bennet escribió:
I see two approaches.
#1, can you use smtproutes to send everything to the other machine, and then
on *that* machine grab the *master accounts and forward them back?
With
Hello everyone
I use Maildir in my configuration and i receveid this message when I
check my messages:
Unable to open local messages
I verified in my server that the messages are located in in the
Maildir/cur directory.
Are the messages Locked?
What is this mean?
thanks in advance
Ok, now i've the following situation
i've switched both scripts /var/qmail/rc and
/var/qmail/defaultdelivery/rc
-
[root@localhost]# cat /var/qmail/rc
#!/bin/sh
# Using splogger to send the log through syslog.
# Using
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:30:03PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
Read http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1894.html (honestly, read the first few
pages at least).
The right way to support this, in qmail, would be to write a small little
program you can drop into your .qmail file, to report
OK. I'm starting the process of setting up Qmail to have MySQL as the
background for all mail accounts. The first thing that I need to know
though is can all virtuals point to MySQL? Or is it something that can't be
done? I'm talking like 400+ domains so I need some easier way to manage
users
Gustavo Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"this user has no $HOME/Maildir"
[...]
[root@localhost]# cat /var/qmail/defaultdelivery/rc
#Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Mailbox by default
./Mailbox
qmail-pop3d requires Maildir delivery in user home directories. You are
currently
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:27:17 -0300, Luis Bezerra wrote:
Unable to open local messages
I verified in my server that the messages are located in in the
Maildir/cur directory.
What MUA (mail reader) are you using? Most likely it doesn't
understand the Maildir method for storing emails.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:46:23PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Something like qreceipt?
Similar, yes. But for proper DSN you need to be talking to
a remote mail gateway, and the response needs to say whether
or not the remote gateway accepted the message.
--
Raul
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 05:49:55PM -0300, Gustavo Schroeder wrote:
But, when i ask for netscape to retrieve messages for the user above, it
returns me
the message "this user has no $HOME/Maildir".
I just don't understand. The messages are there in the directory
/home/user/Maildir/new , but
Is there a nice way to tell qmail-local to deliver to a user's
mbox (/var/spool/mail/$USER) when the user's home directory
($HOME) is unavailable? I was able to make it work by using
qmail-newu and changing the homedir's in /var/qmail/users/assign
but I think that's unmaintainable/unfunctional.
Andy Abshagen wrote:
OK. I'm starting the process of setting up Qmail to have MySQL as the
background for all mail accounts. The first thing that I need to know
though is can all virtuals point to MySQL? Or is it something that can't be
done? I'm talking like 400+ domains so I need some
Andy Bradford wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
monitor qmail.
It is possible that the programs being spawned are exiting, in which
case supervise will start another copy. This could be due to
I am setting up Qmail, but I'm having some problems delivering to external
sites, (550 errors etc) so I just want to check what I'm doing is possible!
Our domain, ourdomain.com, is setup by our ISP + works fine for WWW. The MX
record will point to 'office.ourdomain.com' which will be the address
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:49:14PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
*sounds familiar*
Okay... my turn!
All together now...
"What do the logs say?"TM
(svscan ails silently... =) )
I recommend whoever it is that is doing the lovely qmail shirts (I'll be
ordering mine shortly!) should do
Sorry, Outlook like any other Microsoft product never works properly.
Quoting "Scott D. Yelich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Robin S. Socha wrote:
And would you kindly restrict your line width to something ~72
characters? Thanks.
oh, please... please publically flame me
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:05:06PM +0100, John P wrote:
I am setting up Qmail, but I'm having some problems delivering to external
sites, (550 errors etc) so I just want to check what I'm doing is possible!
Our domain, ourdomain.com, is setup by our ISP + works fine for WWW. The MX
John.
Our domain, ourdomain.com, is setup by our ISP + works fine for WWW. The
MX
We need to see unadulterated logs.
No. We don't want to hear "I am getting something like", we want to see
unadulterated logs.
OK I get the idea :-)
No logs ATM since I am at home spending the (whole) evening
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 03:51:29PM -0700, Mike Jimenez wrote:
In refference to my message earlier about setting up my auto responder
.I have had 0 luck in finding anyone that can seem to help. I was
wondering if there was someone who could lead me in the right direction
to finding some good
Hay, guys.
I want to make sure I don't email djb without having a real legitimate
question.
Are any of you aware of qmail internal data structure/logic documentation
for the qmail programs?
It sure works nicely, but its a desert in there when you gain your
sustenance from comments so you have
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:08:08PM -0700, Ihnen, David wrote:
I want to make sure I don't email djb without having a real legitimate
question.
Don't email djb with qmail questions *ever*. That's what this list is
for.
Are any of you aware of qmail internal data structure/logic documentation
Instead of going straight from reciept to the delivery queue, it would go
I'm not sure I understand this sentence. Mail goes from the delivery queue
to the recipient, not around the other way...
into a processing queue, and hopefully in a manner similar to
qmail-remote/qmail-local rules, a
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:48:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of going straight from reciept to the delivery queue, it would go
I'm not sure I understand this sentence. Mail goes from the delivery queue
to the recipient, not around the other way...
He's saying "receipt" which
Are any of you aware of qmail internal data structure/logic
documentation for the qmail programs?
There's INTERNALS, and "The big qmail picture" somewhere at
www.nrg4u.com (link is on www.qmail.org).
Hm, I'll be sure to read those.
Instead of going straight from reciept to the
hello friends
i am using qmail 1.03 with qmail-ldap-2000601.patch on IBM AIX ,
yesterday my boss came with one intresting requirements like
(1) changing priority of any queued/deffered messages
(2) changing lifetime of defered/queued message
(3) restricting no of
78 matches
Mail list logo
