Not receiving

2001-09-26 Thread Activate
I have several clients who say that they can send fine but when receiving is happening it hangs on the first one and then gives up the error number is 0x800ccc19 Does anyone know if there is a simple answer to this. Kind Regards Chris Chris Green www.activ8.com Tel: +44(0)1702-316-963 Fax:

RE: Not receiving

2001-09-26 Thread Hubbard, David
That is an outlook express error and the problem is with whatever method they're using to check their email, either client or server-side. Either way, it's not qmailadmin related and we'd need far more information to diagnose the problem. Dave -Original Message- From: Activate

Re: Not receiving

2001-09-26 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
I have had this problem in the past. Some junk mail was in the mail queue for those users. I used Netscape to read their mail and then forwarded all but the bad message back to them. - Original Message - From: Hubbard, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Hubbard, David
Seems like multiple admins in at the same time could result in collisions if they were changing the same thing at the same time, e.g. both are looking at the properties of one user and typing a new name or password, one hits submit, the update happens, the other hits submit, the first admin's

Re: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/26/01 12:31 PM, Hubbard, David at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: Seems like multiple admins in at the same time could result in collisions if they were changing the same thing at the same time, e.g. both are looking at the properties of one user and typing a new name or password, one hits

RE: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Hubbard, David
Bill Shupp wrote: While this is true, I think it would be rare. The vpopmail command line tools can be used by multiple administrators, and I've never had a problem (with as many as 4 administrators at one time). I'm not as concerned with people overwriting each others changes as I am

Re: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/26/01 12:54 PM, Casey Zacek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: I was emailing back and forth with Gabriel Ambuehl about the no-forwarding-postmaster's-email topic, and I accidentally deleted the last one, but I believe the concensus was that deleting postmaster and making it just forward to

Re: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/26/01 2:24 PM, Brad Dameron at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: Bill, One issue I might see is users being able to add more than their limit. Based on what I see in the code it loads the limits when it first opens and checks to see how many of each already exhist but doesn't check again until

non-postmaster administrators

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Shupp
Now that the multiple administrator idea is integrated, seems to me the next logical step would be to allow the postmaster (and other admins?) the right to grant admin privileges to others. What do you folks think? Should this be the function only of the system administrator? Or maybe an

Re: non-postmaster administrators

2001-09-26 Thread Casey Zacek
Hubbard, David spoke forth with the blessed manuscript: If anything, I'd like that as a configurable option on a per-domain basis. I fully agree there. -Original Message- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:59 PM Subject:

Autorespond 2.0.

2001-09-26 Thread Brad Dameron
Anyone have any additions they want to see in the new autorespond or any bugs? --- Brad Dameron Network Account Executive TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com

Re: Re[2]: qmailadmin 0.84 and vpopmail-5.0 patch

2001-09-26 Thread Ken Jones
On Wed, 2001-09-26 at 14:13, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Casey, Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 7:54:25 PM, you wrote: Not only that, but (at least for me) it's really up to the customer, and the customers want this ability, so I'm very glad it's