Re: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol

2005-04-15 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, At 20:56 14.04.2005 -0500, you wrote: I'm actually not familiar with the chkuser patch, but I will look at it. The spamcontrol patch does more than just check users before delivery and I hate to lose functionality, so do you know if the chkuser patch has similar functionality. I'm sure

Re: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol

2005-04-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 08.57 15/04/2005, you wrote: Hi, At 20:56 14.04.2005 -0500, you wrote: I'm actually not familiar with the chkuser patch, but I will look at it. The spamcontrol patch does more than just check users before delivery and I hate to lose functionality, so do you know if the chkuser patch has similar

RE: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol

2005-04-14 Thread White, Brad
Why not use the chkuser patch to qmail instead? If you are using vpopmail, it's the way to go. -Original Message- From: Trey Nolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:38 PM To: qmailadmin@inter7.com Subject: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol I am using the

Re: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol

2005-04-14 Thread Trey Nolen
can't use both. Trey Nolen - Original Message - From: White, Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailadmin@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:42 PM Subject: RE: [qmailadmin] qmailadmin + spamcontrol Why not use the chkuser patch to qmail instead? If you are using vpopmail, it's the way