On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Tonight. QA'ing the package still.
Can I update it directly? or do I need to remove previous clamav prior to
compile?
Natalio
Hello
you can simply do the update
Natalio Gatti wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Erik A. Espinoza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonight. QA'ing the package still.
Can I update it directly? or do I need to remove previous clamav prior
to compile?
Natalio Gatti wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Erik A. Espinoza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonight. QA'ing the package still.
Can I update it directly? or do I need to remove previous clamav prior
to compile?
Natalio
If you use qtp-newmodel you
Hi all.
I've a question: I'm working in an upgrade of a mailing system from
sendmail to qmail.
The translation from old version of user mailbox to the new is done but
I'm in trouble with the translation of the 'smtpd.rules' of sendmail in
rules for 'tcp.smtp' of qmail.
Anyone have made this
On Nov 18, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
If you use qtp-newmodel you shouldn't need to be concerned about
this. ;)
According to qtp-remove-pkgs script,
# only packages = the specific version will be removed
remove_older=\
clamav-toaster-0.92.1-1.3.17 \
I believe it'd be ok to
Alessandro Maestri wrote:
Hi all.
I've a question: I'm working in an upgrade of a mailing system from
sendmail to qmail.
The translation from old version of user mailbox to the new is done but
I'm in trouble with the translation of the 'smtpd.rules' of sendmail in
rules for 'tcp.smtp' of
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Steve Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 18, 2008, at 7:57 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
If you use qtp-newmodel you shouldn't need to be concerned about this. ;)
According to qtp-remove-pkgs script,
# only packages = the specific version will be removed
I do the same thing. I change the ssh port to something random like
8739 and when I get my daily logwatch email I almost never see any ssh
connection except from my ip.
-Original Message-
From: James Beam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:13 PM
To:
Fail2ban sounds cool, what I do instead is disable password
authentication for ssh and use certificate based authentication. I
haven't had a system compromised since I've gone to doing this.
See
http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/03/24/tcossh-public-key-authenticatio
n/ if you're not familiar.
Chris Hillman wrote:
Fail2ban sounds cool, what I do instead is disable password
authentication for ssh and use certificate based authentication. I
haven't had a system compromised since I've gone to doing this.
See
http://www.extrapepperoni.com/2007/03/24/tcossh-public-key-authenticatio
n/ if
Alessandro Maestri wrote:
Hi all.
I've a question: I'm working in an upgrade of a mailing system from
sendmail to qmail.
The translation from old version of user mailbox to the new is done
but I'm in trouble with the translation of the 'smtpd.rules' of
sendmail in rules for 'tcp.smtp' of
So I had an issue with my qtp-newmodel.
I am running on Fedora 7; fully updated, haven't had an issue with
qtp-newmodel until this calmav update. I can see what the problem is but
want to check before making changes and possibly breaking my qmail server.
The message I get that halts the update
Am 18.11.2008 um 01:13 schrieb James Beam:
No, this server is purely spam/virus front end (more efficient than
the ms equivalent for exchange) - no real users exist at all. I use
smtproutes to forward the emails on to exchange once simscan has
done its duty.
My goal was to stop the ssh
I have used all of the above in the past and frankly, I got lazy and just
let fail2ban handle things for me - hard blocking an IP address for a set
period of time works well to discourage and remove your IP from botnets.
If I ever get overly concerned, I lock the port down to only accessible
Thomas M. Jaeger wrote:
So I had an issue with my qtp-newmodel.
I am running on Fedora 7; fully updated, haven’t had an issue with
qtp-newmodel until this calmav update. I can see what the problem is but
want to check before making changes and possibly breaking my qmail
server. The
James Beam wrote:
I highly recommend the CentQMT5.1.1 iso for anyone wanting to have a
simple automated build, worked great out of the box (well no box but
still...).
Thanks for the plug!
We've been toying with the idea of a mailed CD as well as a download (CD
and shipping extra of
I commented out the rpmforge install and removed the --enablerepo-rpmforge
from the yum update line. So far it has worked. Thank you again for your
help.
Thomas M. Jaeger
Computer Technician, A.A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL
We found an issue with the gcc compiler included with Cent4 versus
Cent5. A floating point math error would result in trying to run the
QControl program on a Cent4 machine since it was compiled on a Cent5
machine.
We have compiled a Cent4 specific version, and it is now available on
the site
Hi Jakes,
I need ur help urgently. My mail server has suddenly stopped responding on
port 110. it was up and running till 30 min back my collegues told me then
only i came to know that they are not able to recieve mails and download in
their outlook.
#qmailctl stat
authlib: up (pid 5613)
19 matches
Mail list logo
