Hi Everyone,
I think my qmail toaster setup had been corrupted. How can I uninstall
everything, so that I can start with new qmail-toaster setup again?
Regards,
Amit
Dear Amit,
What problem exactly you are facing ?
Regards,
Ganesh Payelkar
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:57 AM, amit IKF a...@ikf.co.in wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I think my qmail toaster setup had been corrupted. How can I uninstall
everything, so that I can start with new qmail-toaster
Hi Ganesh,
Initially Spamassassin was not working. And now suddenly my imap
server is not responding. Its telling unable to connect imap server
when i trying to telnet to my localhost imap port. Also I think few
packages are missing. So I was planning to reinstall complete server
again.
Regards,
Hi,
I've encountered a problem: one of my mail server's ip address is
listed by spamcop. Spamcop says that my system has sent email to one
of its spam traps twice in 15.6 days.
I've checked that my system is not an open relay. My hunch is that
this might have caused by vacation messages:
Hi,
I paid and downloaded the cd with the most recent Centos on-the-go install
of qmailtoaster.
All went well until I tried to update the server using qtp-menu and newmodel
script
From /var/log/aufs-build.log I get this:
/bin/sh: line 0: test: -ge: unary operator expected
fs/aufs
make
Hi Amit,
Why not use the ready made ISO installer from Jake.
It installs everything for you.
madmac
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Ganesh,
Initially Spamassassin was not working. And now suddenly my imap
server is not responding. Its telling unable to connect imap server
when i trying to telnet to my
Hi Madmac,
But it is with centos 4. I want it on centos 5.
Regards,
Amit
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tricube sysad...@tricubemedia.com wrote:
Hi Amit,
Why not use the ready made ISO installer from Jake.
It installs everything for you.
madmac
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Ganesh,
If my installation goes perfect. Can I create iso for the qmail toaster.
Regards,
Amit
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:47 PM, amit IKF a...@ikf.co.in wrote:
Hi Madmac,
But it is with centos 4. I want it on centos 5.
Regards,
Amit
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tricube
I will answer my own question...
All would be good if instead of supposing I have all requisites up to date,
I should have make myself sure of that.
After updating kernel and kernel-devel sandbox is building...
Lets see if it finishes with no errors...
-Mensagem original-
De: António
W dniu 07.07.2009 15:43, António Pedro Lima pisze:
[...]
From /var/log/aufs-build.log I get this:
[...]
make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.1.6.el5/build: No such file or directory.
Stop.
make: *** [fs/aufs/aufs.ko] Error 2
Probably the easy way would be reinstall it all over…
Any hint? I’d
Either that, or run qtp-newmodel. That will catch any packages that are
missing.
Tricube wrote:
Hi Amit,
Why not use the ready made ISO installer from Jake.
It installs everything for you.
madmac
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Ganesh,
Initially Spamassassin was not working. And now suddenly my imap
Peter Peltonen wrote:
Hi,
I've encountered a problem: one of my mail server's ip address is
listed by spamcop. Spamcop says that my system has sent email to one
of its spam traps twice in 15.6 days.
I've checked that my system is not an open relay. My hunch is that
this might have caused by
António Pedro Lima wrote:
Hi,
I paid and downloaded the cd with the most recent Centos “on-the-go” install
of qmailtoaster.
All went well until I tried to update the server using qtp-menu and newmodel
script
From /var/log/aufs-build.log I get this:
/bin/sh: line 0: test: -ge: unary operator
Here's a tip from David Stiller on the spamdyke list. In order to stop
receiving backscatter and any email with forged headers:
blacklist all local domains. If you force
SMTP-Auth Logins, they should be able to send anyway, as the
authorization succeeds and all filters are bypassed.
Add your
Yes I thought it would check and update/upgrade as it needed...
But no, the kernel and kernel-devel do not upgrade, and the script seeks for
the path but as it can't find it stops there with that error.
I already updated the packages, and the update script is still running.
Seems stuck in:
+ rm
W dniu 07.07.2009 12:53, Peter Peltonen pisze:
Hi,
I've encountered a problem: one of my mail server's ip address is
listed by spamcop. Spamcop says that my system has sent email to one
of its spam traps twice in 15.6 days.
[...]
So, I am interested in finding out two things:
1) what would be
The CentOS5 ISO is available for a modest fee. Money well spent IMHO.
Alternatively, you install COS4, then upgrade to COS5. That's a bit
tricky, but should work. Takes some time as well.
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Madmac,
But it is with centos 4. I want it on centos 5.
Regards,
Amit
On Tue, Jul
I have this same problem here.
One machine of my enterprise was infected with a spam bot virus.
I Just remove the virus and delist my ip from Spamcop. Easy.
Cheers
Thiago
-Mensagem original-
De: Aleksander Podsiadly [mailto:a...@westside.kielce.pl]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 7 de julho
Maybe I'm kind of naïve, but I don't understand why does a facility
(vacation autoresponders) created since the start of the electronic
mail services, would need to be blocked. IMHO, it shouldn't be part of
spam control!
Juan Pablo García Hernández
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Eric
On Jul 7, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Juan Pablo García wrote:
Maybe I'm kind of naïve, but I don't understand why does a facility
(vacation autoresponders) created since the start of the electronic
mail services, would need to be blocked. IMHO, it shouldn't be part of
spam control!
you're not naïve,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Aleksander
Podsiadlya...@westside.kielce.pl wrote:
Is SNAT on this banned server?
Maybe one of intranet computers is infected. You can use SMTP Transparent
proxy http://smtp-proxy.klolik.org/ to block infected workstations. Works
for me. :)
Nope. It was
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Steve Huffsh...@vecna.org wrote:
SpamCop has several relevant FAQ entries:
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/76.html
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/298.html
this is SpamCop's form which enables you to look up your own IP address and
get
Peter Peltonen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Steve Huffsh...@vecna.org wrote:
SpamCop has several relevant FAQ entries:
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/76.html
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/298.html
this is SpamCop's form which enables you to look up your own IP
No problem,
The Centos5 version is availiable from Jake for a small fee, not trying
to get you to buy from Jake, but I did and it saves a whole load of head
aches.
I already mentioned it installs its self. No problemmos
madmac
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Madmac,
But it is with centos 4. I want it
Hi
a while ago i did a install of qmail-toaster using the instructions found in
the qmail-toaster wiki.
Now i want to update and therefore run qtp-newmodel from Qmailtoaster plus.
It runs into problem thou.
Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3.7 starting Tue Jul 7 17:27:39 CEST 2009
The script doesn't 'suppose' it's up to date. It should check via an
available package tool and update it if it's not. What actual kernel release
package-name are you using?
Justice London
Systems Administrator
E-mail: jlon...@lawinfo.com
-Original Message-
From: António Pedro Lima
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
If it's due to a forged sender address that's sent to your domain, the tip I
just posted to the list about backscatter should solve your problem.
The backscatter fix was for blacklisting local domains, right? I see
how
petrus wrote:
Hi
a while ago i did a install of qmail-toaster using the instructions
found in the qmail-toaster wiki.
Now i want to update and therefore run qtp-newmodel from Qmailtoaster plus.
It runs into problem thou.
Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3.7 starting Tue Jul 7
Peter Peltonen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
If it's due to a forged sender address that's sent to your domain, the tip I
just posted to the list about backscatter should solve your problem.
The backscatter fix was for blacklisting local
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
* spammer forges a foo...@wahoo.dom address
* this foo...@yahoo.com happens to be a spamcop trap
* spammer sends from this address an email to my user, who has
autoresponder on
at this point in the chain, ideally you'd reject the mail
I did not meant the script should suppose...
I supposed I had my system up to date when I ran the script...
Should have checked...
It would have been nice that the script would not end with an error...
The problem is that, as I understand, the script looks for files in paths
that (if the system
Steve Huff wrote:
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
* spammer forges a foo...@wahoo.dom address
* this foo...@yahoo.com happens to be a spamcop trap
* spammer sends from this address an email to my user, who has
autoresponder on
at this point in the chain, ideally you'd
The script shouldn't have ended with the error that it did. It should
have detected that you weren't current.
Can you describe what the state of your system was? Such as
Was kernel-devel installed at all? If so, which version(s)?
Which version(s) of the kernel were installed?
Which version of
Hi Eric and thanks for the quick reply
I trimmed the email a bit, hope nobody mind.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
[snip]
You've come to the right place. ;)
Looks like a bug. I don't expect that anyone has run qtp-newmodel on FC10
yet.
The .i386
Eric Shubert wrote:
The .i386 shouldn't be part of the installed package name. This is
causing the compare_versions routine in qtp-config to choke.
Hey Jake, since when did the arch become part of the package name
I believe that's the standard with the new distros now. I don't
Well. I should learn to listen to my gut, and I should always remember what
Rich Miller taught... EVERY comms issue on the internet comes down to some
DNS error somewhere. :)
Thanks for the responses, gents. I ended up implementing a split-DNS, and
that resolved my issues.
qmailtoaster
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
Steve Huff wrote:
On Jul 7, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
* spammer forges a foo...@wahoo.dom address
* this foo...@yahoo.com happens to be a spamcop trap
* spammer sends from this address an email to my user, who
Spamdyke's default configuration includess this setting:
max-recipients=50
Say I am running ezmlm or mailman mailing lists with more than 50
recipients. Does spamdyke now prevent these mailing lists from
functioning?
Best,
Peter
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
The .i386 shouldn't be part of the installed package name. This is
causing the compare_versions routine in qtp-config to choke.
Hey Jake, since when did the arch become part of the package name
I believe that's the standard with the new
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
Spamdyke's default configuration includess this setting:
max-recipients=50
Say I am running ezmlm or mailman mailing lists with more than 50
recipients. Does spamdyke now prevent these mailing lists from
functioning?
your answer is here:
Peter Peltonen wrote:
Spamdyke's default configuration includess this setting:
max-recipients=50
Say I am running ezmlm or mailman mailing lists with more than 50
recipients. Does spamdyke now prevent these mailing lists from
functioning?
Best,
Peter
As long as you're using qmail for your
On 2009-07-07, at 12:24 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
Spamdyke's default configuration includess this setting:
max-recipients=50
Say I am running ezmlm or mailman mailing lists with more than 50
recipients. Does spamdyke now prevent these mailing lists from
functioning?
Best,
Peter
it does
I had kernel-devel 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
Now I have kernel-devel 2.6.18-128.16.el5 and the script
did the job :-)
Funny is this:
Jun 30 14:25:49 mail yum: Installed: ncurses-devel-5.5-24.20060715.i386
Jun 30 14:25:50 mail yum: Installed: perl-Razor-Agent-2.84-1.el5.rf.i386
Jun 30 14:27:04 mail
António Pedro Lima wrote:
I had kernel-devel 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
Now I have kernel-devel 2.6.18-128.16.el5 and the script
did the job :-)
Funny is this:
Jun 30 14:25:49 mail yum: Installed: ncurses-devel-5.5-24.20060715.i386
Jun 30 14:25:50 mail yum: Installed:
-Mensagem original-
De: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] Em nome de Eric Shubert
Enviada: terça-feira, 7 de Julho de 2009 22:19
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-build-unionfs failed
António Pedro Lima wrote:
I had kernel-devel 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5
Hello list I have this error and I don't know what to do to resolve
@40004a53cb0e2906dc6c CHKUSER rejected sender: from
SRS0=/otp=da=faxthruemail.com=supp...@bounce.secureserver.net:: remote
smtp32.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net:unknown:64.202.189.176 rcpt :
invalid sender address format
I
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
The .i386 shouldn't be part of the installed package name. This is
causing the compare_versions routine in qtp-config to choke.
Hey Jake, since when did the arch become part of the package name
I believe that's the standard with the new
Can we start over with this? I think it might be best.
Fresh install, new thread.
António Pedro Lima wrote:
-Mensagem original-
De: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] Em nome de Eric Shubert
Enviada: terça-feira, 7 de Julho de 2009 22:19
Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Assunto:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
The .i386 shouldn't be part of the installed package name. This is
causing the compare_versions routine in qtp-config to choke.
Hey Jake, since when did the arch become part of the package name
I believe that's the
49 matches
Mail list logo
