Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create an exclusion in your tcp.smtp or
other similar method to turn off spam scanning.
The only thing
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create an exclusion in your tcp.smtp or
other similar method to turn off spam
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create an exclusion in your
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to /dev/null
Otherwise it goes to the user's Inbox.
-
Qmailtoaster is
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create an exclusion in your tcp.smtp
or other similar method
I think just the clarification that it goes /dev/null whether it's
checked or not. The pertinent information for me is it's not going to
make it to the POP3 client regardless if it's ticked or not.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK,
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to /dev/null
I hate to nit pick, but to be more accurate I believe it's rejected as
spam. In any case, the recipient can never see it.
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then
The spambox option simply moves stuff marked as spam to the spam folder.
This option is really only appropriate for Imap/Squirrelmail, because
once it's moved, POP3 can no longer see it.
If you need to filter POP3 email, that has to be done by the client.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So, if I am
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to /dev/null
I hate to nit pick, but to be more accurate I believe it's rejected as
spam. In any case, the
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
What are you trying to accomplish?
Email that comes in is scanned by Spamassassin. If it scores above the
score you defined in
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to /dev/null
I hate to nit pick, but to be more accurate I believe it's rejected as
spam. In
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to
/dev/null
I hate to nit pick, but to be more accurate I believe it's
W dniu 11.08.2009 20:49, Eric Shubert pisze:
Jake Vickers wrote:
I'd really like to be clear on this, so I understand the inner workings.
My understanding is that yes, the SMTP session remains open during the
simscan phase. If the score is over the threshold in the simcontrol
file
Yes, but it gets moved to a Spambox that can only be accessed via
webmail. I am asking if a Spambox can be created in your POP3 client
(Thunderbird) instead of having to access it via webmail to see if
anything of importance has been marked as SPAM and doesn't make it to my
POP3 client.
I
OK, That's how I understood it works. This is what I was trying to
clarify.
Eric Shubert wrote:
The spambox option simply moves stuff marked as spam to the spam folder.
This option is really only appropriate for Imap/Squirrelmail, because
once it's moved, POP3 can no longer see it.
If you
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Yes, but it gets moved to a Spambox that can only be accessed via
webmail. I am asking if a Spambox can be created in your POP3 client
(Thunderbird) instead of having to access it via webmail to see if
anything of importance has been marked as SPAM and doesn't make it to my
Got it.
I was able to set up Thunderbird as an IMAP client and it works
perfectly including the Sent and SPAM folders. Are there advantages to
one over the other?
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Yes, but it gets moved to a Spambox that can only be accessed via
webmail. I am
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan, then it goes to
/dev/null
I hate to nit pick, but to be more
IMAP is the future, POP3 is the past. ;)
When you have your email on an IMAP-accessible server, you can access it
with any IMAP-capable client from virtually anywhere. Do you need to
share your email account between your desktop and notebook? No problem.
Would you like to pull up your email
After installing an IMAP account and a POP3 in Thunderbird for the same
account I can totally see the benefits and how it works.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
IMAP is the future, POP3 is the past. ;)
When you have your email on an IMAP-accessible server, you can access it
with any IMAP-capable
Hey thanks for all your help. I have a much better understanding of the
setup and the difference between IMAP and POP3.
Using Thunderbird for IMAP was a snap and I can now view all folders on
the server in my client including the SPAM folder.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Hey thanks for all your help. I have a much better understanding of the
setup and the difference between IMAP and POP3.
Using Thunderbird for IMAP was a snap and I can now view all folders on
the server in my client including the SPAM folder.
Thanks for the heads up on Outlook.
I can see where it can be resource intensive on the server. I don't
have enough clients for it to be an issue at the moment, other than I
would have to increase their quota. Only one of my customers has
requested it. I am certain the others don't even
Eric Shubert wrote:
It has to get a copy of the message to scan. It does not return a
successful delivery command to the sending server until the scanning
process is complete (the remote server thinks the receiving server it
still receiving the message). If it fails any of the tests, a
Can anyone please let me know what is available for Greylisting with
Qmail-Toaster
Cheers
Mike Canty
Mike Canty
IT Operations Manager
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
Mike Canty wrote:
Can anyone please let me know what is available for Greylisting with
Qmail-Toaster
Cheers
Mike Canty
Mike Canty
IT Operations Manager
One word: spamdyke. Does greylisting and a whole lot more.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Mike Canty wrote:
Can anyone please let me know what is available for Greylisting with
Qmail-Toaster
Cheers
Mike Canty
Mike Canty
IT Operations Manager
qtp-install-spamdyke is in qmailtoaster-plus package. See the QTP site
and the wiki for more, and you might need to reference the
Be sure to read through http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke,
and use the README file for the nitty gritty.
Mike Canty wrote:
Eric,
Once again, thanks for your assistance.
I had already installed qtp, but I needed to run the qtp-install-spamdyke
script to activate.
Cheers
Eric,
Once again, thanks for your assistance.
I had already installed qtp, but I needed to run the qtp-install-spamdyke
script to activate.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, 12 August 2009 10:46 AM
To:
I came across a few bugs in the mailman toaster configuration. After
some pretty extensive testing, I think the toaster mailman setup is
pretty solid. The wiki page
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Mailman) has been updated with
the changes. If you've thought about trying mailman on
Problem solved.
And yes, I bought yet another Tee shirt. My fricken router blew!!! So it
happened to be something rather simple. Got the RMA today and all is fine.
Glen
Yea, there's only so much you can do remotely. At this point a local visit
is needed. I'm sure you're going to
Great news.
Glen Vickers wrote:
Problem solved.
And yes, I bought yet another Tee shirt. My fricken router blew!!!
So it happened to be something rather simple. Got the RMA today and
all is fine.
Glen
Yea, there's only so much you can do remotely. At this point a local
33 matches
Mail list logo
