Hi All,
I am sure some have seen this before in their smtp logs.
@40004c54490126e69094 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from
keithra...@gmail.com:: remote *User:unknown:63.147.8.197* rcpt
zara-har...@hotmail.com : client allowed to relay
@40004c54490126ec513c spamdyke[1982]: ALLOWED from:
Greetings All,
I need advice from those using Jake's replication system.
I successfully managed to get both servers to run unison and even at one
point [about 2 weeks ago] I believed both servers where in sync. Well I
checked 2 accounts I have on these servers and they were up to date.
On 07/31/2010 02:08 PM, Alex Kisakye wrote:
Greetings All,
I need advice from those using Jake's replication system.
The challenge is think less bandwidth at the primary server about
1/1mbps. The secondary locate in US has lots of bandwidth. Now we
don't receive lots of heavy emails from
On 07/31/2010 01:35 PM, David Milholen wrote:
Hi All,
I am sure some have seen this before in their smtp logs.
@40004c54490126e69094 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from
keithra...@gmail.com:: remote *User:unknown:63.147.8.197* rcpt
zara-har...@hotmail.com : client allowed to relay
Jake Vickers wrote:
On 07/31/2010 01:35 PM, David Milholen wrote:
Hi All,
I am sure some have seen this before in their smtp logs.
@40004c54490126e69094 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from
keithra...@gmail.com:: remote *User:unknown:63.147.8.197* rcpt
zara-har...@hotmail.com : client allowed to
Yes, but only for the subnets I allow.
The ones listed in my tcp.rules. This was ok when the network did not
have over a 1000 users on it. Not everyone uses my domain for email that
is on my network.
I have a rule on the gateway that stops all smtp traffic unless it is
from my server only.
Correct me if I am wrong but in order for every to authenticate to the
server all I need to do is remove some rules in my tcp.rules?
Here is what it looks like currently..
192.168.:deny
172.168.:deny
