I have a fresh install of the QMTISO with yum updates completed and
qtp installed. I tried to update the toaster using the newmodel and got
this error.
Would you like a unionfs/overlay sandbox? (recommended) [y]/n:
Using FUSE union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3.3
qtp-mount-sandbox -
Hi,
Do you have the fuse utilities installed?
yum install fuse
Perhaps that's what you're missing...
Martin
--
Martin Waschbüsch
IT-Dienstleistungen
Lautensackstr. 16
80687 München
Telefon: +49 89 57005708
Fax: +49 89 57868023
Mobil: +49 170 2189794
mar...@waschbuesch.de
You could try this to find out first...
[r...@myserver]# rpm -qa | grep fuse
fuse-2.7.4-8.el5
fuse-libs-2.7.4-8.el5
fuse-unionfs-0.23-1.el5.rf
dkms-fuse-2.7.4-1.nodist.rf
Then if you get no results or notthe same as a bove try this..
[r...@indialau ntfsprogs-2.0.0]# yum -y install fuse
On
Problem: manage replay to invitations managed from iCal server ( the syntax
of responses is ical+68a0f823-0acb-4538-8760-fb6eeac59...@domain.com
Using postfix the solution is set the recipient_delimiter = +
There is a similar solution with qmail?
Thanks.
--
Davide E. Bovolenta
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if any list member would be able to help.
I have a number of domains, on separate IP addresses but whenever a server
connects to the server it receives the same SMTP greeting:
220 cpa2.localdomain - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP
This happens because you smtp service is listening on all ip addresses. If
you want to send separate greeting message individual domains you'll have to
configure multiples instances of smtp services for all the domains on your
server. I am not an expert but this my own understanding, I could be
This happens because you smtp service is listening on all ip addresses. If
you want to send separate greeting message individual domains you'll have to
configure multiples instances of smtp services for all the domains listening
to the specific ip address bindings on your server. I am not an
Thanks for your reply Anil,
I was afraid that you might say that. Doesn't that mean that I need complete
installations of toaster?
I was hoping that someone had patched the daemon L
Thanks again,
Fin
PS: Just in case... any Uber-Geeks out there with alternate suggestions?
May be you can get some help from the link given below:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/qmail/users/129252
Regards,
Anil Aliyan
From: Edward Finlayson [mailto:edward.finlay...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 28 October 2010 17:14
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE:
My first reply does not seem to have arrive so I will try again...
If I understand your question it should be as easy as
editing the smtpgreeting file to reflect the rDNS value.
ie edit /var/qmail.control/smtpgreeting to
mail.domain.com
On 28/10/2010 10:31 PM, Anil Aliyan wrote:
This
Are they not on the same physical box?
On 29/10/2010 12:58 AM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to have common mx servers. My clients have to have
'isolation' from one another and insist that all their 'servers' are within
their own
Hi Tony,
Yes they are indeed. But they need to appear independently to one-another.
Cheers,
Fin
-Original Message-
From: Tony White [mailto:t...@ycs.com.au]
Sent: 28 October 2010 15:10
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp greeting banner frustration
What about virtualising each server in its own
VMWare space?
That way you can guaranteee separation!
On 29/10/2010 12:58 AM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to have common mx servers. My clients have to have
'isolation' from one another
Jake has a VMWare iso and here is a page that might help.
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php?title=VMwareprintable=yes
On 29/10/2010 1:12 AM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Tony,
Yes they are indeed. But they need to appear independently to one-another.
Cheers,
Fin
-Original
You should do:
# rpm -qa | grep ^perl
to see which perl packages are installed. You must have some.
Your rpm -V command isn't quite right either, but I don't think we
really need to do that.
I don't know about removing CPAN modules. Steve, would that really be
necessary? You wouldn't want to
qtp-newmodel invokes teh qtp-build-sandbox script, which should take
care of installing all the packages (including fuse) that you need.
What versions are you running?
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
# qtp-whatami
I might not have the latest fuse packages in the repo yet.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On
On 10/28/2010 01:52 AM, Davide Enrico Bovolenta wrote:
Problem: manage replay to invitations managed from iCal server ( the syntax
of responses isical+68a0f823-0acb-4538-8760-fb6eeac59...@domain.com
Using postfix the solution is set the recipient_delimiter = +
There is a similar solution with
On 10/28/2010 03:31 AM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if any list member would be able to help.
I have a number of domains, on separate IP addresses but whenever a
server connects to the server it receives the same SMTP greeting:
220 *cpa2.localdomain* - Welcome to
On 10/28/2010 06:58 AM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to have common mx servers. My clients have to have
'isolation' from one another and insist that all their 'servers' are within
their own namespace / IP range. This means that I have
Il 28/10/2010 15:58, Edward Finlayson ha scritto:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, I'm unable to have common mx servers. My clients have to have
'isolation' from one another and insist that all their 'servers' are within
their own namespace / IP range. This means that I
[r...@viktorya ~]# rpm -qa | grep toaster
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.15-1.3.10
libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6
You're not running the latest kernel that you have installed. You need
to reboot after upgrading the kernel package.
Try rebooting, and run qtp-newmodel again.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 10/28/2010 10:00 AM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
[r...@viktorya ~]# rpm -qa | grep toaster
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
Hi Eric,
Please don't take this the wrong way but we appear to be talking at cross
purposes. You reference the EHLO string which is of course the outbound
string, used to identify a server to the recipient host. I am referring to
the SMTP Greeting String used to identify the local Receiving sever
Hi everyone,
Thanks to all for your input and help in this irksome matter. If it weren't
for the relative importance of these clients I wouldn't have gone to these
lengths myself.
To that end I will have to take the best advice offered to date and install
multiple SMTP daemons; each monitoring
Hi Eric,
Please don't take this the wrong way but we appear to be talking at cross
purposes. You reference the EHLO string which is of course the outbound
string, used to identify a server to the recipient host. I am referring to
the SMTP Greeting String used to identify the local
OK, will do.
On 10/28/2010 09:21 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
You're not running the latest kernel that you have installed. You need
to reboot after upgrading the kernel package.
Try rebooting, and run qtp-newmodel again.
--
Cecil Yother, Jr. cj
cj's
2318 Clement Ave
Alameda, CA 94501
tel
Hi again Martin,
Indeed they could, and I would advocate this very approach myself.
However, at the risk of sounding like a broken record: a typical domain that
I MUST be able to prove to these clients would look this the DNS snippet
below:
##
#
Edward,
I'm just trying to understand others needs. As I am an ISP, I could be
I'm missing something important for my customers too.
How is it possible to speak about isolation level, when all logs are
mixed together?
The same about sending queue. All customers are using a single output
Hi Tonino,
Sorry if the thread seems to be talking about different issues, but it is
primarily a cosmetic issue but my clients are insistent on this perceived
isolation, the logs and the outbound queues are also split by client domain
after application of an in house patch. To this end there is a
Probably you need a small patch against qmail-smtpd.
Before reading me file, it should try a file named like
100.100.100.100.me.
IP is taken by $TCPLOCALIP variable.
Ciao!
Tonino
Il 28/10/2010 19:29, Edward Finlayson ha scritto:
Hi Tonino,
Sorry if the thread seems to be talking about
You say you have a requirement to be able to prove isolation of
domains. That's a pretty broad term, meaning what exactly? Is
isolation of domains defined anywhere? I think that using DNSStuff to
verify isolation is pretty lame, and I expect you'd agree. Depending on
how much isolation is
Hi Eric,
Please check out the following urls, hotmail for example simultaneously
choose to treat the RFCs a standards and guidelines and simply cherry pick
the ones they like:
http://mail.live.com/mail/policies.aspx
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/22.html
Also it is common knowledge that
Hey Edward,
I'm not seeing any real RFC violations in those links. Spamcop claims
that MS isn't following the RFC, but I believe that is a false claim. I
don't believe there's anything in an RFC about how headers are *displayed*.
I also googled it, and came up with nothing. I don't believe
Hi everyone,
I had an interesting day. Starting getting those calls about email
clients asking for password. Red flag says "mail server way too
busy"
I investigate and find that vchkpw is taking all of the process
load. I look at the number of connections and there
On 10/28/2010 04:02 PM, David Milholen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I had an interesting day. Starting getting those calls about email
clients asking for password. Red flag says mail server way too busy
I investigate and find that vchkpw is taking all of the process load. I
look at the number of
I'm using OSSEC http://www.ossec.net
Very nice and complete IDS/Log analysis package. Easy to install and manage.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 10/28/2010 04:02 PM, David Milholen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I had an interesting day. Starting getting those
If I understand your question it should be as easy as
editing the smtpgreeting file to reflect the rDNS value.
ie edit /var/qmail.control/smtpgreeting to
mail.domain.com
On 28/10/2010 9:31 PM, Edward Finlayson wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if any list member would be able to help.
I
I setup a bridge firewall that way I can control what comes in our out of my
network.
Joel
_
From: David Milholen [mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:03 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] pop attack on server
Hi
Hi Everyone,
Is there anyway to setup auto-response at server level. Actually
Diwali vacations are coming in India which is same like Christmas
vacations, my users want to put out of office auto-response. Now on
few server there are more than 300 users and users doesn't have access
to qmailadmin.
39 matches
Mail list logo
