Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail update in the works?

2008-12-16 Thread Luis Lopez
I did a manual upgrade of the package on Cent5_ x64, and it worked fine. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * * * --- * * *Information contained in this email and any attachments thereto shall be considered privileged and/or confidential. You are hereby notified that any

Re: [qmailtoaster] ezmlm-reject problem

2008-11-03 Thread Luis Lopez
Worked like a charm. Thanks. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * *--- IT Support Kiwibox.com http://kiwibox.com/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * * *Information contained in this email and any attachments thereto shall be considered privileged and/or confidential. You are hereby

[qmailtoaster] ezmlm-reject problem

2008-10-31 Thread Luis Lopez
change the ezmlm-reject behavior to not require the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be in the To: or Cc: ? -- Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * *--- IT Support Kiwibox.com http://kiwibox.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- * * * *Information

Re: [qmailtoaster] ezmlm-reject problem

2008-10-31 Thread Luis Lopez
'#D#' ezmlmrc.dist:|#B#/ezmlm-reject '#D#' ezmlmrc.es:|#B#/ezmlm-reject '#D#' ezmlmrc.fr:|#B#/ezmlm-reject '#D#' ezmlmrc.it:|#B#/ezmlm-reject '#D#' ezmlmrc.ru:|#B#/ezmlm-reject '#D#' Thanks so much for the help. Luis L. On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 14:26 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote: Luis Lopez wrote

Re: [qmailtoaster] ezmlm-reject problem

2008-10-31 Thread Luis Lopez
message path, and no trying to re-write the list rules. Dan Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC When did you do your last backup? Ask me about unattended offsite backup solutions... to protect your business, not just your data! Luis Lopez wrote: Hello, I need

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-12 Thread Luis Lopez
the command to do so. In the meantime the script is doing its job. Thank you so much for explaining this in details, you guys are great!! Sincerely, Luis Lopez Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: Hi Luis, I have tested the suggested procedure on one of my (remotely controlled) servers

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-09 Thread Luis Lopez
Ufff no good then. I haven't removed any zlib package as of this point. Thank God I got this message before that ;), saved me a 3 hours emergency trip lmao. I'll do my research on that one carefully. Sincerely, Luis Lopez Dan McAllister wrote: BE CAREFUL Johannes!!! A LOT of people

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-08 Thread Luis Lopez
as it works, it should be ok. Thanks Guys. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * * * Luis Lopez wrote: Just a quick note on how I installed this. 1. yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install perl-Archive-Tar if for some reason it tries all the repos and errors out with bad checksum go: /yum clean up yum check

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-08 Thread Luis Lopez
This is what I got: # rpm -qa |grep zlib zlib-1.2.3-3 zlib-devel-1.2.3-3 zlib-1.2.3-3 zlib-devel-1.2.3-3 Sincerely, Luis Lopez Eric Shubert wrote: Looks like it's not parsing your zlib package version correctly. What does your system return for: # rpm -qa | grep zlib ? P.S. Glad you're up

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-08 Thread Luis Lopez
PS. This is only happening with that Zlib package as far as i can tell. Sincerely, Luis Lopez Eric Shubert wrote: The rpm command shouldn't be listing zlib twice. I wonder if your rpm database is a bit corrupt. You might try # rpm --rebuilddb Does that fix it? Luis Lopez wrote

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-08 Thread Luis Lopez
Nope, same packages.. showed up. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * * * Eric Shubert wrote: The rpm command shouldn't be listing zlib twice. I wonder if your rpm database is a bit corrupt. You might try # rpm --rebuilddb Does that fix it? Luis Lopez wrote: This is what I got: # rpm -qa |grep

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-08 Thread Luis Lopez
Thanks for that, Dan Eric. In the mean time, I guess I'll ignore the errors from the Zlib then. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * * * * Eric Shubert wrote: Thanks for explaining that, Dan. I'm guessing that there's probably no need to have a zlib package on the QMT site any more, but I don't know

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5 (Resolved)

2008-09-05 Thread Luis Lopez
# yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install perl-Archive-Tar ... Otherwise, check the list archives for the hard way. ;) Luis Lopez wrote: Hi There, I know that a couple of people had dependencies problems installing that spamassassin-toaster package. I /yum update /the server and rebooted and still

[qmailtoaster] spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 || problem on dependencies || 64 bit CentOS 5

2008-09-04 Thread Luis Lopez
-INET6-2.51-2.fc6 perl-Digest-SHA1-2.11-1.2.1 perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-15 perl-BSD-Resource-1.28-1.fc6.1 perl-DBI-1.52-1.fc6 perl-HTML-Tagset-3.10-2.1.1 perl-HTML-Parser-3.55-1.fc6 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 Thanks in advance. -- Sincerely, Luis Lopez * *--- IT Support

Re: [qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks

2008-08-07 Thread Luis Lopez
worked perfectly.. Thanks. Sincerely, Luis Lopez * *--- IT Support Kiwibox.com http://kiwibox.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Eric Shubert wrote: Also, be sure to use TLS/SSL along with authentication. Otherwise your login/password would

[qmailtoaster] Authentication to bypass spam checks

2008-08-05 Thread Luis Lopez
and bypass the spam mechanism? I know that I probably configured QT wrong, lets see if I can get it right this time. Thanks in advance. -- Sincerely, Luis Lopez * *--- IT Support Kiwibox.com http://kiwibox.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED