Hmmm,
didn't analyze that one... well I'm going to check everything again...
I'll get back to you guys on this one as time permits.
2007/7/2, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi AM,
On 7/2/07, A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that we may disable incoming checks and just maintain
Hi,
First of all may thanks to Nick for is excellent work and dedication to QMT.
Second congrats to Erik for is appointement ;)
As for the way things will go I would like to point out a reuest of
maintaining DK.
Buggy or not sinning is a major deal so I hope it stays in, even has an
option.
It may stay as an option, not 100% sure yet. The problem is that it is
broken and can lose mail if enabled, even if the incoming mail is not
signed.
Erik
On 7/2/07, A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
First of all may thanks to Nick for is excellent work and dedication to QMT.
Second congrats
I think that we may disable incoming checks and just maintain outbound
signing.
As far as I saw there are no outgoiong issues with DK. This way we still get
our
messages signed :)
I've also been checking DKIM and I'm thinking of taking some tests during
this July.
I'll post news on this as I go
Hi AM,
On 7/2/07, A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that we may disable incoming checks and just maintain outbound
signing.
As far as I saw there are no outgoiong issues with DK. This way we still get
our
messages signed :)
Failure to sign will cause outbound signing to silently fail as
Erik A. Espinoza ha scritto:
The 1.4 branch is in the restructuring phase. Moving configs over to a
config package, and other things. I believe the final 1.4 will be
basically the same patches we have now (without Warlord, With Updated
SRS CHKUSER patches).
What about the
No. It contains broken DK, which may be coming out. It also doesnt have SRS.
Erik
On 6/29/07, davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A. Espinoza ha scritto:
The 1.4 branch is in the restructuring phase. Moving configs over to a
config package, and other things. I believe the final
Hi all . . .
I have not had sufficient time to devote to qmailtoaster development. I
have asked Erik Espinoza to take the lead role in qmailtoaster's
development.
I am pleased that he has accepted. And, I am confident that he has the
ability and vision to take qmailtoaster to the next level.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all . . .
I have not had sufficient time to devote to qmailtoaster development. I
have asked Erik Espinoza to take the lead role in qmailtoaster's
development.
I am pleased that he has accepted. And, I am confident that he has the
ability and vision to take
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:29 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Erik Espinoza - lead qmailtoaster developer
Hi all . . .
I have not had sufficient time to devote to qmailtoaster development. I
have asked Erik Espinoza
Thanks for the kind words. I will be spending the next couple of weeks
merging the main site and devel site together, so as to have a
cohesive location for all Qmail Toaster packages.
I plan to continue releasing security updates for the 1.3 branch, but
the vast majority of my work will be spent
Erik A. Espinoza ha scritto:
Thanks for the kind words. I will be spending the next couple of weeks
merging the main site and devel site together, so as to have a
cohesive location for all Qmail Toaster packages.
I plan to continue releasing security updates for the 1.3 branch, but
the vast
Hi Davide,
The 1.4 branch is in the restructuring phase. Moving configs over to a
config package, and other things. I believe the final 1.4 will be
basically the same patches we have now (without Warlord, With Updated
SRS CHKUSER patches).
Thanks,
Erik
On 6/28/07, davide bozzelli [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
