Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-30 Thread PakOgah
anyway didn't you realize, not SPAM are getting smarter ? they can get low score 3 I think you set the score like that many SPAM will come to your users' mailbox?? In my opinion tagged score = 3, quarantine score =5, cutoff score = 7 can you tell us the reason why you set the scores like

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-30 Thread Jake Vickers
PakOgah wrote: anyway didn't you realize, not SPAM are getting smarter ? they can get low score 3 I think you set the score like that many SPAM will come to your users' mailbox?? In my opinion tagged score = 3, quarantine score =5, cutoff score = 7 can you tell us the reason why you set the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-29 Thread Jake Vickers
PakOgah wrote: If you want to use it, you'll need to change the default in simscan, or it will be deleting it before mailfilter can get it. What I've done is put my scoring at 5.0 (in my local.cf), my mailfilter score at 10.0, and my simscan score at 18.0. That allows me to drop the mail that

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-29 Thread PakOgah
If you want to use it, you'll need to change the default in simscan, or it will be deleting it before mailfilter can get it. What I've done is put my scoring at 5.0 (in my local.cf), my mailfilter score at 10.0, and my simscan score at 18.0. That allows me to drop the mail that is blatantly

[qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-27 Thread John
I'm the one that has been trying to get answers as to why the infamous .Spam box gets created when I send the sample spam text to a user with spam detection enabled. Thanks to those who tried to help out. In the end, I had to just keep reading on my own, and reverse engineering

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-27 Thread Jake Vickers
John wrote: I'm the one that has been trying to get answers as to why the infamous .Spam box gets created when I send the sample spam text to a user with spam detection enabled. Thanks to those who tried to help out. In the end, I had to just keep reading on my own, and reverse

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-27 Thread Philip Nix Guru
Hello if you have a standard installation (no modded spec files ) a message tagged as SPAM will be rejected if it reaches a spam level of 12 ( :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif) but it is compiled with s spam-level of 20 ... so if no set in your simcontrol file, it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam detection--now I get it... maybe

2007-03-27 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Hi John, Simscan + SpamAssassin rejects spam above 12 hits (by default) before it hits the qmail-queue (hard reject). This is very obvious spam and it is usually safe to reject at this many hits, as it is very unlikely to be legitimate at this number of hits. SpamAssassin will also label 5-11.9