On 05/29/2011 03:32 AM, Martin Waschbüsch IT-Dienstleistungen wrote:
Hi Jake,
Am 28.05.2011 um 17:19 schrieb Jake Vickers:
So I'm still curious as to what you think the benefits are. Segregating your
data into multiple tables was always the way I learned to obtain performance.
The nature of
Hi Jake,
Am 28.05.2011 um 17:19 schrieb Jake Vickers:
So I'm still curious as to what you think the benefits are. Segregating your
data into multiple tables was always the way I learned to obtain performance.
The nature of the requests from QMT are probably not those that would require
On 05/27/2011 12:10 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 05/26/2011 07:55 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 05/26/2011 05:41 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I would like to see QMT get to a single-table configuration for
vpopmail/mysql. Is that never going to happen, or perhaps happen
with 5.5? It might be best to
Hi all!
Am 27.05.2011 um 06:10 schrieb Eric Shubert:
Apologies for the hijack.
I just seem to recall this being discussed a bit, some time ago, and
concluding (perhaps with no consensus) that having all domains in a single
table made more sense.
This was discussed here some time ago
On 05/26/2011 07:55 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
On 05/26/2011 05:41 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I would like to see QMT get to a single-table configuration for
vpopmail/mysql. Is that never going to happen, or perhaps happen
with 5.5? It might be best to leave vpopmail at 5.4.x with QMTv2.0,
then
