RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-28 Thread Michael J. Colvin
Message- From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Yes, they both support imap. On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Michael J

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-28 Thread Scott Hughes
-Original Message- From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Yes, they both support imap. On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:07 PM

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-28 Thread Michael J. Colvin
on the same network too. Mike -Original Message- From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Yes, they both support imap

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-28 Thread Michael J. Colvin
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available On 03/28/2011 04:51 PM, Michael J. Colvin wrote: No problem. Let me know. I like to keep track of scripts that I use to see if they work for others too. Mike Mike, Are there any you have

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-23 Thread Scott Hughes
. Is that right? If so, do they both support IMAP? Mike -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:48 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available To run rsync on windoze

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-23 Thread Michael J. Colvin
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Yes, they both support imap. On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Michael J. Colvin mcol...@norcalisp.com wrote: Scott: I may have missed what you are trying to do, but I think you're

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-23 Thread Scott Hughes
Message- From: Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Yes, they both support imap. On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Michael J

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Scott Hughes
, 2011 12:44 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available On 03/22/2011 06:44 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote: These are available now in the QTP repo. Is there any security

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Scott Hughes
] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:48 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available I saw your post on the dovecot list. It'll be interesting to see what they say. Have you googled the FORWARD flag? I know nothing about it. -- -Eric 'shubes

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Scott Hughes
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available Is it something per RFC, or something unique to your old mail system? How is the email stored on the old server? Perhaps use rsync or fetchmail instead of imapsync? (Never heard of imapsync myself

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Scott Hughes
: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:33 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available rsync would probably be simplest if your old server was using maildir format. Good for doing preliminary runs too before cutting over, so there's not much mail

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Michael J. Colvin
...@shubes.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 4:48 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available To run rsync on windoze, you can install cygwin, and then rsync for cygwin. This would only work with maildir mailboxes. No telling what dovecot

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-22 Thread Bharath Chari
On 03/23/2011 02:29 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: Is it something per RFC, or something unique to your old mail system? How is the email stored on the old server? Perhaps use rsync or fetchmail instead of imapsync? (Never heard of imapsync myself) I've used imapsync before. It's a perl script that

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-21 Thread mattias
I could not find dovecot in the repo mail m...@mjw.se telefon 0104906298 -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 1:08 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available I

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-21 Thread Scott Hughes
Thanks Eric. I was trying to read the page on my iPhone and missed it. You mentioned that we who are upgrading should disable the services (dovecot 1.2.3 logging) from running. How does one go about that with these types of services? Thanks again for the write-up! I've built a test server and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Dovecot 2.0.11 rpms for QMT available

2011-03-21 Thread Scott Hughes
I understand now. Thanks, Scott On Mar 21, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: Same way as you would disable courier imap, as in the wiki page. If you created supervise directory trees with run files, you need to put a down file (an empty file, literally named down) next