29, 2010 12:36:54 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Strange Behavior of Domainkey
Hi all,
I was just going with mails after long time. So waiting for new version of
qmail
toaster. Anyway I had already posted a wiki page on how to setup DKIM with
qmail
toaster long time back. Please find the link
)
header...@nospamthanks.com
From: Amit Dalia a...@ikf.co.in
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wed, December 29, 2010 12:36:54 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Strange Behavior of Domainkey
Hi all,
I was just going
Thanks guys for the advices.
I'll switch to dkim then,
~yuri
On 12/29/2010 12:59 AM, Martin Waschbüsch wrote:
Hi all,
The problem with the stock domainkey configuration is that it will only
sign things when they enter the queue. If any application uses qmail as
sendmail replacement (e.g.
SPF is configured and not causing any problem in both cases.
I was contemplating the possibility that it could be some difference in
the config line for localhost vs anything else, but i made them identical
as well. and it doesn't help :(
...@shubes.net]
Sent: 28 December 2010 23:24
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Strange Behavior of Domainkey
The stock qmail-dk is just plain broken. It sometimes works, but it also
fails to sign properly in some (unpredictable AFAICT) circumstances. I
recommmend
Hi all,
The problem with the stock domainkey configuration is that it will only sign
things when they enter the queue. If any application uses qmail as sendmail
replacement (e.g. a locally installed squirrelmail or horde webmail can be
configured to do it), then the message will not be signed.
