calisp.com// **
*From:* Dave Hallowell [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
*Sent:* Monday, March 01, 2010 12:37 PM
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
So I bumped up the MAXDAEMONS=50 and restarted qmail. About four
hours later, I have 43 imapd process
-
>>
>> *From:* Dave Hallowell [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 01, 2010 12:37 PM
>> *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
>>
>>
>>
>> So I bumped up th
12:37 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
So I bumped up the MAXDAEMONS=50 and restarted qmail. About four hours
later, I have 43 imapd processes running and getting new mail results in a
timeout on thunderbird. I killall imapd processes, and ca
Dave and Jake - thx. Will take a look into this as well.
Helmut
_
From: Dave Hallowell [mailto:d...@acbsco.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:37 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
So I bumped up the MAXDAEMONS
So I bumped up the MAXDAEMONS=50 and restarted qmail. About four hours
later, I have 43 imapd processes running and getting new mail results
in a timeout on thunderbird. I killall imapd processes, and can get
emails immediately. I noticed there is also a MAXPERIP=4 and I bumped
it up to MAXPER
Jake,
Ah ha. I see MAXDAEMONS=40. How'd I miss that? Okay, I'll bump it up
and see what happens. Any suggestions on the number or just trial and
error?
Thanks Jake.
Dave
Jake Vickers wrote:
On 03/01/2010 10:23 AM, Dave Hallowell wrote:
Helmut,
I recently ran into this problem with
On 03/01/2010 10:23 AM, Dave Hallowell wrote:
Helmut,
I recently ran into this problem with imap timing out. I don't use
squirrelmail much, but I was getting timeouts using thunderbird when
trying to send and receive from imap email accounts. I read a post on
this list about timeouts when th
day, February 26, 2010 7:40 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
On 02/26/2010 07:50 PM, Helmut Fritz wrote:
Thx Eric. 52 sent and 61 inbox. Just logged into it now and it was
fast, even sending with no error. Maybe just an inter
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Michael Colvin wrote:
> I think I've seen this before and it was either IMAP connections limitation
> issue, a timeout issue, or a MySQL issue...Maybe a combination? :-) I
> don't remember, it's been a few years.
>
> Usually, I would see it when the server
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
On 02/26/2010 07:50 PM, Helmut Fritz wrote:
> Thx Eric. 52 sent and 61 inbox. Just logged into it now and it was
> fast, even sending with no error. Maybe just an internet thing
> (although that should not lead to am imap disconnecti
On 02/26/2010 07:50 PM, Helmut Fritz wrote:
Thx Eric. 52 sent and 61 inbox. Just logged into it now and it was fast,
even sending with no error. Maybe just an internet thing (although that
should not lead to am imap disconnection?). It did do this once before, and
a reboot of the server clear
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: squirrelmail/imap issue
>
> Thx Eric. 52 sent and 61 inbox. Just logged into it now and it was fast,
> even sending with no error. Maybe just an internet thing (although that
> should not lead to am imap disconnection?). It did do this once before,
&g
Thx Eric. 52 sent and 61 inbox. Just logged into it now and it was fast,
even sending with no error. Maybe just an internet thing (although that
should not lead to am imap disconnection?). It did do this once before, and
a reboot of the server cleared it up.
Helmut
-Original Message-
13 matches
Mail list logo
