, 2006
10:14 AM
To:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Status
11 SIGSEGV
I've had very
similar issues. I was testing the load performance of my qmailtoaster machine.
I had my web server email 400 unique emails to my account, I only received a
measly 100 or so of them
In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to
believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing
qmail-smtpd, but rather the source in which it is coming from. Has
anyone seen this or know about it?
Can't say I've seen this exact same problem, but
, 2006 10:34 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to
believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing
qmail-smtpd, but rather the source in which it is coming from
On 10/4/06, Chris Godwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also want to know what the BADMIMETYPE and BADLOADERTYPE directives in
tcp.smtp control, or what do they do?
They block messages with specific type of attachments (by the
attachment's MIME type and not by file extension like simscan does). I
-
From: Peter Peltonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:57 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
On 10/4/06, Chris Godwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also want to know what the BADMIMETYPE and BADLOADERTYPE directives
] Status 11 SIGSEGV
In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to
believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing
qmail-smtpd, but rather the source in which it is coming from. Has
anyone seen this or know about it?
Can't say I've seen this exact
-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
This is indeed strange, Chris.
Is this a fresh CentOS 4.4 install?
Fresh toaster (what versions)?
Is the postfix machine on a remote domain (from the toaster's
viewpoint)?
Chris Godwin wrote:
I don't think that's the case because
Chris Godwin wrote:
Yes, I'm using centos 4.4, toaster versions are as below (They were
current when the install took place):
I'd rather see:
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
;)
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
, October 04, 2006 11:26 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
Chris Godwin wrote:
Yes, I'm using centos 4.4, toaster versions are as below (They were
current when the install took place):
I'd rather see:
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
;)
--
-Eric
I'd have to agree with Duncan. I'd recommend running memtest on this machine.
Erik
On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to
believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing
qmail-smtpd,
Ready for the twist?
I'm running a drbd cluster of two of these machines. I'm failing over
with heartbeat and drbd. I have used this setup with qmr with no
problems. So the issue is happening on both machines on brand new ibm
hardware. I've initiated a failover to the second machine so it is
recordio should give you a hint.
I'm guessing that it might be RBL/DNS related. Are you running a caching DNS
server? If running bind, what does
# service named status
tell you?
Chris Godwin wrote:
Ready for the twist?
I'm running a drbd cluster of two of these machines. I'm failing over
://www.networklogistic.com/help
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:57 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
recordio should give you a hint.
I'm guessing that it might be RBL/DNS related
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:57 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
recordio should give you a hint.
I'm guessing that it might be RBL/DNS related. Are you running a caching
DNS
server? If running bind, what does
# service named
Network Logistic, Inc.
Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:57 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
recordio should
Logistic, Inc.
Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:33 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
Chris Godwin wrote:
How do I use
/help
-Original Message-
From: Chris Godwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 1:42 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV
I didn't get it going at all. BUT I FOUND THE PROBLEM!!! YAY! Here's
what the conversation says
Chris Godwin wrote:
Hello all,
Im new to
qmail toaster, not new to
qmail. I have a centos install of qmail toaster. I would say that about
20% of
all email destined for the server gets dropped by qmail-smtpd, which
exites
with code 11 according to tcpserver. I cannot
18 matches
Mail list logo
