RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Phil Leinhauser
What do you mean you changed a DC to backup? Is DNS still on it? Is that where you are getting dns from? If you removed AD from a DNS DC, then DNS will be flakey if it runs at all. Try random browsing from the toaster and see how well DNS performs. -Original Message- From: Kent

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Jake Vickers
Kent Busbee wrote: Ok, forgive me b/c I am trying to go through gmail to get this out more quickly the queue is 200+ and growing. I believe the emails are going out very slowly. My first post was at 10:48 AM and did not show up until 2:29 PM. Thanks for the testing/ help all. My MX

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Domnick Eger
That usually means Yahoo or another ISP is deferring your connection due to reported abuse, or you have exceeded your allow connection in each session. This is common with Yahoo, if it extend more then two days, your on there Blacklist and have to get removed by feeling out the form on there

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Domnick Eger
: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog That usually means Yahoo or another ISP is deferring your connection due to reported abuse, or you have exceeded your allow connection in each session. This is common with Yahoo, if it extend more then two days, your on there Blacklist and have to get removed by feeling out

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Phil Leinhauser
OK, moving any FSMO roles won't have anything to do with your problem then. The Domain Naming master also doesn't have anything to do with DNS. It's the central manager for your own AD domain and nothing on the outside. I was concerned if you demoted a DC that you were getting DNS from. Where

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Kent Busbee
[r...@mail ~]# cat /etc/resolv.conf search ncs-ad.northlakechristian.org nameserver 192.168.1.5 nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 192.168.1.254 nameserver 207.29.223.56 nameserver 207.29.223.58 [r...@mail ~]# 192.168.1.5 is my MS ncsw2k3 server I don't think dns is the problem It looks like I may

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Kent Busbee
OK... My queue is now down to 0. I am writing from my server. Let's hope this goes through. What I need to do is figure out what caused: a) the server to eat all the bandwidth of our T1 b) what caused the queue to get so full and take so long to get out. See response above; Kent Busbee

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: bandwidth hog

2009-08-19 Thread Eric Shubert
I'm on it. I'll let Kent report back the results of our findings. Kent Busbee wrote: OK... My queue is now down to 0. I am writing from my server. Let's hope this goes through. What I need to do is figure out what caused: a) the server to eat all the bandwidth of our T1 b) what caused the