Dear All,
I have a couple of Qmail Toasters. One server sends out digitally signed
contract notes as attachments to the other server and those messages as
bounced as follows.
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.server1.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the
I guess CLAMAV marks some password-protected archive-files as viruses. I have seen an
option ArchiveBlockEncrypted in /etc/clamd.conf. Check that option!
Best regards,
Johannes Weberhofer
Biju Jose wrote:
Dear All,
I have a couple of Qmail Toasters. One server sends out digitally signed
patch to prevent domains not-existing on my server from relaying thru my
server.
a) i had a client who purchased a email hosting from me : domain1.com he
created an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b) now using the SMTP authentication information for the above he also
sends/relays emails from [EMAIL
thanks for your help
2008/5/21 Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ariel wrote:
you can delete the content that is inside / var / qmail / simscam?
ls -lah /var/qmail/simscam
1191595938.800430.10430
1195224345.50318.5
1168514964.810114.1026
1191595928.140878.10358
The host www.dsbl.org is having hardware issues, and the ISP that gave
it free hosting has seen enough internal changes that the staff who made
the arrangments are no longer there to help out.
So, as of early AM (US/Eastern) Monday, www.dsbl.org is down and the
RBL is not getting updated. While
Gabriel Lai wrote:
Hi all,
I have the below error message when connecting via POP3-SSL
connection. It terminated after a while. Please help
@4000483382b925925ebc DEBUG: Unexpected SSL connection shutdown.
@4000483382b925926a74 tcpserver: end 4195 status 256
@4000483382b925927244
Thanks Johannes Weberhofer,
I had changed /etc/clamd.conf as follows
ScanArchive no
ArchiveBlockEncrypted yes
Now mails are getting delivered...But when the mail is opened the following
is added to the top of the message, which is not elegant. Is there a way I
can remove this?
Suspicious
Raj wrote:
patch to prevent domains not-existing on my server from relaying thru my
server.
a) i had a client who purchased a email hosting from me : domain1.com he
created an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b) now using the SMTP authentication information for the above he also
sends/relays emails from
Biju Jose wrote:
Thanks Johannes Weberhofer,
I had changed /etc/clamd.conf as follows
ScanArchive no
ArchiveBlockEncrypted yes
Now mails are getting delivered...But when the mail is opened the following
is added to the top of the message, which is not elegant. Is there a way I
can remove
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ed Morrison wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ed Morrison wrote:
Hi All:
I am trying to setup my toaster to allow relaying from a Sendmail
internal server. I can send email out to an external address like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but for my internal addresses I receive
an error of
Ed Morrison wrote:
What does your tcp.smtp file look like now? I think you're missing
the NOP0FCHECK from your :allow line.
No, it is till there:
10.0.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ed Morrison wrote:
What does your tcp.smtp file look like now? I think you're missing
the NOP0FCHECK from your :allow line.
No, it is till there:
10.0.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1
Ed Morrison wrote:
No pain Jake. I appreciate the help.
Yes, the accounts exist on QMT. Unfortunately, sendmail is required.
It is for the our web store that is being developed for our new website.
Sorry if I missed something, but if the accounts exist on the system why
are you trying to
Hi all,
I have problem with mail server setup using this guide for CentOS 5
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install
The problem is that qmail-dk does not sign all outgoing messages.
Everything in configuration seems to be ok and one of outgoing messages
is signed but
Jake Vickers wrote:
The host www.dsbl.org is having hardware issues, and the ISP that gave
it free hosting has seen enough internal changes that the staff who made
the arrangments are no longer there to help out.
So, as of early AM (US/Eastern) Monday, www.dsbl.org is down and the
RBL is
It's been a year or so since I stopped using DNSBL and spamcop. ZEN.Spamhaus
does great on it's own.
Phil
-Original message-
From: Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 10:13:05 -0400
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] FYI - dsbl.org is
Salih Yakoubov wrote:
Hi all,
I have problem with mail server setup using this guide for CentOS 5
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_5_QmailToaster_Install
The problem is that qmail-dk does not sign all outgoing messages.
Everything in configuration seems to be ok and one of
Hi Eric,
�Anywise, I don't know of anyone working to fixing this. I think you'll
�either have to live with it as is or find a C programmer who can do the job.
A few months ago, there was new found inspiration to work on a new GUI along
with a few other things. There was a lot of talk, planning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric,
�Anywise, I don't know of anyone working to fixing this. I think you'll
�either have to live with it as is or find a C programmer who can do the job.
A few months ago, there was new found inspiration to work on a new GUI along
with a few other
�Yes there are. �There are 2 GUI projects I'm aware of being worked on for
�QMT. �One is going to be OSS (AFAIK) and the other will be closed source.
� I'm not sure as to what projected release dates are for either, but
�hopefully soon.
Cool, the initiatives lived on. Nice to hear, thanks for
Hello Eric,
thank you for suggesting recordio! While debugging, I have recognized that on
the receiving server the certificate.pem file was not readable for the smtp
process. I decided to fix that and - voilà - the problem on forwarding mails is
gone! Now I can forward the mails from one
Good day
How would one go about upgrading spamdyke if it was installed with the
qtp package?
Sam announced on the spamdyke list that spamdyke version 3.1.8 is now
available.
Is there a proper way to upgrade with the qtp install? Or should I
just download compile and replace the
dnk wrote:
Good day
How would one go about upgrading spamdyke if it was installed with the
qtp package?
Sam announced on the spamdyke list that spamdyke version 3.1.8 is now
available.
Is there a proper way to upgrade with the qtp install? Or should I just
download compile and
Jake Vickers Wrote :
Can we see the full header to see if this was added by clamav?
If it was, you'd need to ask the clamav people how to not add this
header info. I was not aware clamav even added information to the
emails in this manner.
Dear Jake
I had repeated the test and found
Did anyone knows how to fix this or if nothing is wrong why it is
happening??? I'm having the same problem right now.
--
JO
senthil vel wrote:
Hi List,
When i am sending mails to one domain(eyeheight.com
http://eyeheight.com) the mail is going out from my server with out
any
Is spamdyke installed on either one of these toasters?
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
Did anyone knows how to fix this or if nothing is wrong why it is
happening??? I'm having the same problem right now.
--
JO
senthil vel wrote:
Hi List,
When i am sending mails to one
If it is not in the qmailtoaster packages then it is not in my toasters.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Is spamdyke installed on either one of these toasters?
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
Did anyone knows how to fix this or if nothing is wrong why it is
happening??? I'm having the same problem right
I have some clients (using Outlook 2003) who couldn't send email by using
port 587. After appling SP2 to their machines, it works a little better,
but they still have intermittent problems. I use Thunderbird most of the
time and it works fine. So it gives me a feeling that it should still be a
What are the permissions of your .pem files?
(ls -l /var/qmail/control/*.pem)
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
If it is not in the qmailtoaster packages then it is not in my toasters.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Is spamdyke installed on either one of these toasters?
Jose R. Ortiz Ubarri wrote:
29 matches
Mail list logo
