Re: [qmailtoaster] re: delay
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster the mail is delivered immediately. Maxwell Smart wrote: I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to the same mail server. These used to be virtually simultaneous. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: r...@area510.net Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 02:30:18 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 1340, pid: 1342, t: 11.6467s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9803 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on laetitia.area510.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO nlpi157.prodigy.net) (unkn...@207.115.36.171) by laetitia.area510.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 02:30:06 - Received-SPF: unknown (laetitia.area510.net: Maximum nesting level exceeded, possible loop) Received: from sophia.area510.net (ns1.area510.net [64.168.70.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi157.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/map_regex/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O2U52w001792 for c...@yother.com; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:30:05 -0500 Received: by sophia.area510.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id EFB17202B9; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:05 -0700 (PDT) If I am reading this correctly there is only 13 seconds elapsed from the time the server received the message to the time it sent it, yet I am not able to check it for up to 20 minutes in some cases. Any ideas where to look to try and isolate this? Here is another snip from the mail server to a sbc account. Nearly 19 minutes lapse. From - Wed Sep 23 21:45:56 2009 X-Account-Key: account4 X-UIDL: 20090924044227M04001q1vre78 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from nlpi147.prodigy.net ([207.115.36.161]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc04) with ESMTP id 20090924044226M0400n0jore; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:42:26 + X-Originating-IP: [207.115.36.161] X-Originating-IP: [64.168.70.133] Received: from laetitia.area510.net (mail.yother.com [64.168.70.133]) by nlpi147.prodigy.net (8.13.8 inb ipv6 jeff0203/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O4gPhU017190 for cjyot...@pacbell.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:42:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 7599 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7591, pid: 7594, t: 0.0982s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m: 51/d:9803 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.145?) (c...@yother.com@71.139.170.193) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Message-ID: 4abaf455.4030...@yother.com I can also watch tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current and see an email pass through, but still not be able to retrieve it for up to 20 minutes sometimes. I have also tested my ISP's DNS server response times and they are both in the 8.00ms range. The caching nameserver appears to be working correctly too. 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=8.01 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=7.81 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=8.45 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=7.66 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=7.99 ms CJ Maxwell Smart wrote: Thanks Jake, That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink my entire rack configuration. I have been trying to simplify this and it only seems to be getting more complex. Is it OK to see entries like this in my message file. My understanding is the only one that is critical is the host unreachable, but I have periodically checked it and it's working correctly. Sep 23 11:15:25 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving '95.193.115.189.in-addr.arpa/CNAME/IN': 200.175.89.133#53 Sep 23 11:15:25 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving '95.193.115.189.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN': 200.175.89.133#53 Sep 23 11:17:03 laetitia named[22986]: client 127.0.0.1#53386: error sending response: host unreachable Sep 23 12:05:43 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (REFUSED) resolving 'pdnssr01.ebnccsb.com.my//IN': 161.142.2.17#53 Sep 23 12:05:43 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (REFUSED) resolving 'pdnssr01.ebnccsb.com.my/A/IN': 161.142.2.17#53 Sep 23 12:05:46 laetitia named[22986]: lame server resolving 'maybank.my' (in 'maybank.my'?): 202.187.45.2#53 Sep 23 12:06:12 laetitia named[22986]: client 127.0.0.1#33727: error sending response: host unreachable Sep 23 12:06:45 laetitia named[22986]: client 127.0.0.1#43177: error sending response: host unreachable Sep 23 12:09:38 laetitia named[22986]: lame server resolving
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: delay
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to djbdns. Works for me so far... On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote: Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster the mail is delivered immediately. Maxwell Smart wrote: I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to the same mail server. These used to be virtually simultaneous. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: r...@area510.net Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 02:30:18 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 1340, pid: 1342, t: 11.6467s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9803 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on laetitia.area510.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO nlpi157.prodigy.net) (unkn...@207.115.36.171 ) by laetitia.area510.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 02:30:06 - Received-SPF: unknown (laetitia.area510.net: Maximum nesting level exceeded, possible loop) Received: from sophia.area510.net (ns1.area510.net [64.168.70.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi157.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/map_regex/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O2U52w001792 for c...@yother.com; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:30:05 -0500 Received: by sophia.area510.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id EFB17202B9; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:05 -0700 (PDT) If I am reading this correctly there is only 13 seconds elapsed from the time the server received the message to the time it sent it, yet I am not able to check it for up to 20 minutes in some cases. Any ideas where to look to try and isolate this? Here is another snip from the mail server to a sbc account. Nearly 19 minutes lapse. From - Wed Sep 23 21:45:56 2009 X-Account-Key: account4 X-UIDL: 20090924044227M04001q1vre78 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from nlpi147.prodigy.net([207.115.36.161]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc04) with ESMTP id 20090924044226M0400n0jore; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:42:26 + X-Originating-IP: [207.115.36.161] X-Originating-IP: [64.168.70.133] Received: from laetitia.area510.net (mail.yother.com [64.168.70.133]) by nlpi147.prodigy.net (8.13.8 inb ipv6 jeff0203/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O4gPhU017190 for cjyot...@pacbell.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:42:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 7599 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7591, pid: 7594, t: 0.0982s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m: 51/d:9803 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.145?) (c...@yother.com@ 71.139.170.193) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Message-ID: 4abaf455.4030...@yother.com I can also watch tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current and see an email pass through, but still not be able to retrieve it for up to 20 minutes sometimes. I have also tested my ISP's DNS server response times and they are both in the 8.00ms range. The caching nameserver appears to be working correctly too. 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=8.01 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=7.81 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=8.45 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=7.66 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=7.99 ms CJ Maxwell Smart wrote: Thanks Jake, That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink my entire rack configuration. I have been trying to simplify this and it only seems to be getting more complex. Is it OK to see entries like this in my message file. My understanding is the only one that is critical is the host unreachable, but I have periodically checked it and it's working correctly. Sep 23 11:15:25 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving '95.193.115.189.in-addr.arpa/CNAME/IN': 200.175.89.133#53 Sep 23 11:15:25 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving '95.193.115.189.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN': 200.175.89.133#53 Sep 23 11:17:03 laetitia named[22986]: client 127.0.0.1#53386: error sending response: host unreachable Sep 23 12:05:43 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (REFUSED) resolving 'pdnssr01.ebnccsb.com.my//IN': 161.142.2.17#53 Sep 23 12:05:43 laetitia named[22986]: unexpected RCODE (REFUSED) resolving 'pdnssr01.ebnccsb.com.my/A/IN': 161.142.2.17#53 Sep 23 12:05:46 laetitia named[22986]: lame server resolving 'maybank.my' (in 'maybank.my'?): 202.187.45.2#53 Sep 23 12:06:12 laetitia named[22986]: client 127.0.0.1#33727: error sending response: host unreachable Sep 23 12:06:45
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: delay
Peter, Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised? CJ Peter Tan wrote: I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to djbdns. Works for me so far... On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com wrote: Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster the mail is delivered immediately. Maxwell Smart wrote: I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to the same mail server. These used to be virtually simultaneous. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: r...@area510.net mailto:r...@area510.net Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com mailto:yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 02:30:18 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 1340, pid: 1342, t: 11.6467s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9803 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO nlpi157.prodigy.net http://nlpi157.prodigy.net) (unkn...@207.115.36.171 mailto:unkn...@207.115.36.171) by laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 02:30:06 - Received-SPF: unknown (laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net: Maximum nesting level exceeded, possible loop) Received: from sophia.area510.net http://sophia.area510.net (ns1.area510.net http://ns1.area510.net [64.168.70.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi157.prodigy.net http://nlpi157.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/map_regex/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O2U52w001792 for c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:30:05 -0500 Received: by sophia.area510.net http://sophia.area510.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id EFB17202B9; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:05 -0700 (PDT) If I am reading this correctly there is only 13 seconds elapsed from the time the server received the message to the time it sent it, yet I am not able to check it for up to 20 minutes in some cases. Any ideas where to look to try and isolate this? Here is another snip from the mail server to a sbc account. Nearly 19 minutes lapse. From - Wed Sep 23 21:45:56 2009 X-Account-Key: account4 X-UIDL: 20090924044227M04001q1vre78 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from nlpi147.prodigy.net http://nlpi147.prodigy.net ([207.115.36.161]) by isp.att.net http://isp.att.net (frfwmxc04) with ESMTP id 20090924044226M0400n0jore; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:42:26 + X-Originating-IP: [207.115.36.161] X-Originating-IP: [64.168.70.133] Received: from laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net (mail.yother.com http://mail.yother.com [64.168.70.133]) by nlpi147.prodigy.net http://nlpi147.prodigy.net (8.13.8 inb ipv6 jeff0203/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O4gPhU017190 for cjyot...@pacbell.net mailto:cjyot...@pacbell.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:42:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 7599 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7591, pid: 7594, t: 0.0982s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m: 51/d:9803 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.145?) (c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com@71.139.170.193 http://71.139.170.193) by laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Message-ID: 4abaf455.4030...@yother.com mailto:4abaf455.4030...@yother.com I can also watch tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current and see an email pass through, but still not be able to retrieve it for up to 20 minutes sometimes. I have also tested my ISP's DNS server response times and they are both in the 8.00ms range. The caching nameserver appears to be working correctly too. 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12 http://206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=8.01 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12 http://206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=7.81 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12 http://206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=8.45 ms 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron.hourly and clamav updating
admin wrote: Actually i want to update hourly my clamav installation but i don't wanto to receive the state check email hourly. Or at last i want to change the address where this mail is sent. Cannot find the mail command in the unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh script. Thanks, Kartone Il giorno 22/set/2009, alle ore 19.27, Richard Vinke ha scritto: *For Clamav sanesecurity -in old unofficial-clamav-sigs.conf or new clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf : set yes for silence - receive** only error conditions : * # If you want to silence the information reported by curl, rsync, gpg # or the general script comments, change the following variables to # yes. If all variables are set to yes, the script will output # nothing except error conditions. curl_silence=yes # Default is no to report curl statistics rsync_silence=yes # Default is no to report rsync statistics gpg_silence=yes # Default is no to report gpg signature status comment_silence=yes # Default is no to report script comments *enable logging to yes :* # Log update information to '$log_file_path/$log_file_name'. enable_logging=yes log_file_path=/var/log log_file_name=clamav-unofficial-sigs.log *Is recommended to install the latest version clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.6 http://sanesecurity.org.uk/download_scripts_linux.htm ! Regards, Constantin IOAJA *
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron.hourly and clamav updating
Jake Vickers wrote: Kartone wrote: No, mail continues arrive hourly. I changed the MAILTO option in the crontab as suggested by Jake. Did you change the config file options? Kartone wrote: Yes, crontab MAILTO option. I was talking about the options in the script's config file. * I'm sorry Jake, I later saw your advice . Regards, Constantin*
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron.hourly and clamav updating
Hi, thanks very much for the clearly aswer, i hope this will resolve all my problems. Thanks to everybody in ml too. This is a great place to solve problems :-) Kartone Il giorno 24/set/2009, alle ore 10.32, Constantin IOAJA ha scritto: admin wrote: Actually i want to update hourly my clamav installation but i don't wanto to receive the state check email hourly. Or at last i want to change the address where this mail is sent. Cannot find the mail command in the unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh script. Thanks, Kartone Il giorno 22/set/2009, alle ore 19.27, Richard Vinke ha scritto: For Clamav sanesecurity -in old unofficial-clamav-sigs.conf or new clamav-unofficial-sigs.conf : set yes for silence - receive only error conditions : # If you want to silence the information reported by curl, rsync, gpg # or the general script comments, change the following variables to # yes. If all variables are set to yes, the script will output # nothing except error conditions. curl_silence=yes # Default is no to report curl statistics rsync_silence=yes # Default is no to report rsync statistics gpg_silence=yes # Default is no to report gpg signature status comment_silence=yes # Default is no to report script comments enable logging to yes : # Log update information to '$log_file_path/$log_file_name'. enable_logging=yes log_file_path=/var/log log_file_name=clamav-unofficial-sigs.log Is recommended to install the latest version clamav-unofficial- sigs-3.6 http://sanesecurity.org.uk/download_scripts_linux.htm ! Regards, Constantin IOAJA
[qmailtoaster] Slowly get e-mail at last version 1.3.19
Hi list, I had upgraded qmail-toaster to 1.3.19, but I fell it works more slowly then 1.3.18 and I can't find any errors. I changed to 1.3.18 , It works well and faster. Any one have same problem? -- Regards, Kevin Qiu SA Beijing Foxit Software Company - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Whitelist any domain
Hi Everyone, I got a bounced message from my toaster server. And the reason for bounce is mentioned below: Could not deliver message to the following recipient(s): Failed Recipient: Local Emailid Reason: Remote host said: 421 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry does not resolve. The email-id which got this bounced message is for 1 of my client and asked them to ask there ISP to resolve there RDNS issue. But mean while his ISP resolve the RDNS issue, I want to whitelist his domain on my toaster since I'm expecting some important documents. So how can I whitelist this domain? Do I need to whitelist this domain in local.cf file of spamassassin or in rcpthosts file? Thanks and regards, Amit
Re: [qmailtoaster] Deferral problem.
Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote: Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: The List. First off I must apologize for stupidity on my part. If I have offended anybody I offer my sincere apologies. I thought I had edited out the domain name in my post but I see that it shows all in its full glory. My intention in not disclosing the IP or Domain was to protect the domain owner. I still have not been able to resolve the problem. It seems like a problem external to the server. I found this out by installing QMT5 on another machine and am getting the same problem on it. Outbound mail is not leaving the server. I am receiving mail normally. Thanks for all the excellent help available on the list. Khan Md Ashraf You did not offend, but without the real domain name or IP address (and possibly full, unedited logs) we can be of little help. I mentioned in one of my previous emails that the issue was possibly with the other server. Can you show us some logs where the error is showing (include 15 lines before the error, and 15 after so we can see the full transaction). Also set up an account (such as your Gmail account you're using) and try sending to that domain. Does it go through? I understand wanting to protect your mail server, but addresses are scrubbed from these emails when they are posted to the Internet, so the only ones who get these messages are admins like yourself. I run plenty of these systems for other people - I have no desire to do anything or know anything about your server. Mr. Vickers, Thank you. I am a much relieved man. I was only worried that some third parties would misuse the same. I happy that you have cleared that up for me. I receive mail to the server. No mail leaves the server. To even other QMT mail servers I have installed and manage. From my understanding of it, outbound mail is not leaving my server. It fails I think because of this @40004ab661f92150677c starting delivery 206: msg 3294479 to remote heloch...@cbl.abuseat.org mailto:heloch...@cbl.abuseat.org @40004ab661f921507334 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60 @40004ab662c61668138c delivery 206: deferral: Connected_to_82.94.216.251_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ And as far as I can make out this is different from the deferral related to spam list lookups. I have double and triple checked if the IP is listed on any spam list and it hasn't showed on any. This IP also is not a NAT for any local LAN' s, It sits on the DMZ of the firewall and does only mail. Try doing some telnet tests, as outlined here: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_use_telnet_for_diagnostics It looks like your firewall may have a spam proxy or smtp proxy and is intercepting the transmissions. If you're not sure, give us the results of the telnet test you did.
Re: [qmailtoaster] Slowly get e-mail at last version 1.3.19
Kevin Qiu - 邱波 - Foxit BJ - SA wrote: Hi list, I had upgraded qmail-toaster to 1.3.19, but I fell it works more slowly then 1.3.18 and I can't find any errors. I changed to 1.3.18 , It works well and faster. Any one have same problem? Can you define slow? What makes you think it's slower? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Whitelist any domain
That looks like you have spamdyke installed. You can whitelist the IP of the server in your whitelist_ip-file that is configured in your spamdyke.conf Just put the IP on a line in that file. If you have for example: ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/whitelist_ip in your spamdyke.conf you add the IP of the sending server to the file: /var/qmail/control/whitelist_ip that's it Andreas Am Thursday 24 September 2009 13:07:08 schrieb amit IKF: Hi Everyone, I got a bounced message from my toaster server. And the reason for bounce is mentioned below: Could not deliver message to the following recipient(s): Failed Recipient: Local Emailid Reason: Remote host said: 421 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry does not resolve. The email-id which got this bounced message is for 1 of my client and asked them to ask there ISP to resolve there RDNS issue. But mean while his ISP resolve the RDNS issue, I want to whitelist his domain on my toaster since I'm expecting some important documents. So how can I whitelist this domain? Do I need to whitelist this domain in local.cf file of spamassassin or in rcpthosts file? Thanks and regards, Amit - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Whitelist any domain
Thanks Andreas. Thats solve my *temporary* problem until there ISP set proper RDNS name. Regards, Amit On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Andreas Galatis a...@unet.de wrote: That looks like you have spamdyke installed. You can whitelist the IP of the server in your whitelist_ip-file that is configured in your spamdyke.conf Just put the IP on a line in that file. If you have for example: ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/whitelist_ip in your spamdyke.conf you add the IP of the sending server to the file: /var/qmail/control/whitelist_ip that's it Andreas Am Thursday 24 September 2009 13:07:08 schrieb amit IKF: Hi Everyone, I got a bounced message from my toaster server. And the reason for bounce is mentioned below: Could not deliver message to the following recipient(s): Failed Recipient: Local Emailid Reason: Remote host said: 421 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry does not resolve. The email-id which got this bounced message is for 1 of my client and asked them to ask there ISP to resolve there RDNS issue. But mean while his ISP resolve the RDNS issue, I want to whitelist his domain on my toaster since I'm expecting some important documents. So how can I whitelist this domain? Do I need to whitelist this domain in local.cf file of spamassassin or in rcpthosts file? Thanks and regards, Amit - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group ( www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] re: delay
CJ, Check system log to see if there were unknown logins, like user id 'admqd'. I also received complaints from other sites that my server was sending SPAM. Didn't have time to check other problems, users were screaming... Just switched to djbdns and problem solved. Peter On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote: Peter, Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised? CJ Peter Tan wrote: I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to djbdns. Works for me so far... On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com mailto: c...@yother.com wrote: Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster the mail is delivered immediately. Maxwell Smart wrote: I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to the same mail server. These used to be virtually simultaneous. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: r...@area510.net mailto:r...@area510.net Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com mailto:yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 02:30:18 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 1340, pid: 1342, t: 11.6467s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m:51/d:9803 spam: 3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from unknown (HELO nlpi157.prodigy.net http://nlpi157.prodigy.net) (unkn...@207.115.36.171 mailto:unkn...@207.115.36.171) by laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net with SMTP; 24 Sep 2009 02:30:06 - Received-SPF: unknown (laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net: Maximum nesting level exceeded, possible loop) Received: from sophia.area510.net http://sophia.area510.net (ns1.area510.net http://ns1.area510.net [64.168.70.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi157.prodigy.net http://nlpi157.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/map_regex/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O2U52w001792 for c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:30:05 -0500 Received: by sophia.area510.net http://sophia.area510.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id EFB17202B9; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:05 -0700 (PDT) If I am reading this correctly there is only 13 seconds elapsed from the time the server received the message to the time it sent it, yet I am not able to check it for up to 20 minutes in some cases. Any ideas where to look to try and isolate this? Here is another snip from the mail server to a sbc account. Nearly 19 minutes lapse. From - Wed Sep 23 21:45:56 2009 X-Account-Key: account4 X-UIDL: 20090924044227M04001q1vre78 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Received: from nlpi147.prodigy.net http://nlpi147.prodigy.net ([207.115.36.161]) by isp.att.net http://isp.att.net (frfwmxc04) with ESMTP id 20090924044226M0400n0jore; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:42:26 + X-Originating-IP: [207.115.36.161] X-Originating-IP: [64.168.70.133] Received: from laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net (mail.yother.com http://mail.yother.com [64.168.70.133]) by nlpi147.prodigy.net http://nlpi147.prodigy.net (8.13.8 inb ipv6 jeff0203/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8O4gPhU017190 for cjyot...@pacbell.net mailto:cjyot...@pacbell.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:42:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 7599 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7591, pid: 7594, t: 0.0982s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2 /m: 51/d:9803 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.145?) (c...@yother.com mailto:c...@yother.com@71.139.170.193 http://71.139.170.193) by laetitia.area510.net http://laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 04:23:50 - Message-ID: 4abaf455.4030...@yother.com mailto:4abaf455.4030...@yother.com I can also watch tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current and see an email pass through, but still not be able to retrieve it for up to 20 minutes sometimes. I have also tested my ISP's DNS server response times and they are both in the 8.00ms range. The caching nameserver appears to be working correctly too. 64 bytes from 206.13.28.12
[qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
Greetings list, I have a problem with one of my users who is trying to send out a large amount of emails (900+) at one time. We are a school, and we try to send out regular updates to our alumni regarding upcoming events and interests. These emails are generated via a database program, then sent through this particular users Outlook client. This is not spam, but to our email server, it is being treated like it. Which I appreciate. All the users in the database have asked to have emails sent to them. Below are the 2 separate bounce back messages, the tcp.smtp settings, and the spamdyke.conf setting for max recipients. It appears that the messages are still being stopped after the recipient limit hits 50. The chkuser_recptlimit=1000. What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out without errors? __ From: System Administrator Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:00 AM To: Ellen Lastname Subject:Undeliverable: Go Big Blue! Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Go Big Blue! Sent: 9/24/2009 9:59 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: different-u...@domain.net on 9/24/2009 10:00 AM 571 sorry, you are violating our security policies (#5.7.1 - chkuser) __ From: System Administrator Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:59 AM To: Ellen Lastname Subject:Undeliverable: Go Big Blue! Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Go Big Blue! Sent: 9/24/2009 9:59 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: u...@domain.com on 9/24/2009 9:59 AM 571 sorry, reached maximum number of recipients for one session (#5.7.1 - chkuser) tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,RBLSMTPD=,NOP0FCHECK=1 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=1000,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=100,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private,NOP0FCHECK=1 /et/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf max-recipients=1000 Thanks, John - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote: What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out without errors? you need to set up an ezmlm mailing list on the toaster and have your user send mass emails via this list rather than via Outlook. that's what mailing lists are for. :) -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
Steve Huff wrote: On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote: What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out without errors? you need to set up an ezmlm mailing list on the toaster and have your user send mass emails via this list rather than via Outlook. that's what mailing lists are for. :) -steve I realize that's an option, and probably my first choice as well. We all ready utilize many ezmlm mailing lists for teachers, staff, and parents. For this particular situation though the data is kept in a database all ready that has the mail/merge functionality designed for this specific purpose, and it would be nice to keep the data in one place instead of two. Thanks for your suggestion. John - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Imap Problem
Hi List I have problem whit IMAP account. When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server? Thanks for your help
Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem
Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hi List I have problem whit IMAP account. When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server? Thanks for your help That is how Outlook handles deletion in IMAP. I do not know if there is a workaround for this in Outlook. Other clients do not have the same issue (there are LOTS of web pages complaining about IMAP support in Outlook)
RE: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem
Ok, thanks Jake and if I find the solution I'll put in an email to help other users who have the same problem Saludos. borderless_small Borderless Consulting Group SA de CV. Noel Alban Rivera Rivera Jefe de Redes y Telecomunicaciones Tel. (915) 633-61-04 Nextel 62*142650*2 P Por favor considera el medio ambiente antes de imprimir este e-mail. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, use, disclosure or distribution of such confidential information without the written authorization of Borderless Consulting Group is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. By receiving this e-mail you acknowledge that any breach by you and/or your representatives of the above provisions may entitle Borderless Consulting Group to seek for damages. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo, pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido. La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito de Borderless Consulting Group está prohibida. Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo, favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como cualesquiera copia del mismo. Mediante la recepción del presente correo usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, Borderless Consulting Group tendrá derecho a los daños y perjuicios que esto le cause. From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] Sent: Jueves, 24 de Septiembre de 2009 11:07 a.m. To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hi List I have problem whit IMAP account. When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server? Thanks for your help That is how Outlook handles deletion in IMAP. I do not know if there is a workaround for this in Outlook. Other clients do not have the same issue (there are LOTS of web pages complaining about IMAP support in Outlook) image001.jpg
Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem
That's the way Outlook does IMAP all right. Pretty screwy. In order to get the messages to disappear from the screen, go to View--Arrange By--Current View and click Hide messages marked for deletion. I'm not sure off hand when the message actually get deleted. I think there's an option for configuring that, and it's different between O'03 and O'07. FWIW, Outlook will also not save messages in the IMAP Sent folder. You need to create an Email Rule manually to do that. I also create a rule for filing spam. Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Ok, thanks Jake and if I find the solution I'll put in an email to help other users who have the same problem Saludos. borderless_small *Borderless Consulting Group SA de CV.* Noel Alban Rivera Rivera Jefe de Redes y Telecomunicaciones Tel. (915) 633-61-04 Nextel 62*142650*2 */P/**/ Por favor considera el medio ambiente antes de imprimir este e-mail./* -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, use, disclosure or distribution of such confidential information without the written authorization of Borderless Consulting Group is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. By receiving this e-mail you acknowledge that any breach by you and/or your representatives of the above provisions may entitle Borderless Consulting Group to seek for damages. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo, pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido. La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito de Borderless Consulting Group está prohibida. Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo, favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como cualesquiera copia del mismo. Mediante la recepción del presente correo usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, Borderless Consulting Group tendrá derecho a los daños y perjuicios que esto le cause. *From:* Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] *Sent:* Jueves, 24 de Septiembre de 2009 11:07 a.m. *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hi List I have problem whit IMAP account. When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server? Thanks for your help That is how Outlook handles deletion in IMAP. I do not know if there is a workaround for this in Outlook. Other clients do not have the same issue (there are LOTS of web pages complaining about IMAP support in Outlook) -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
John Hansen Director of Technology Cotter Schools 1115 W. Broadway Winona, MN 55987 507-453-5000 www.cotterschools.org Steve Huff wrote: On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote: What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out without errors? you need to set up an ezmlm mailing list on the toaster and have your user send mass emails via this list rather than via Outlook. that's what mailing lists are for. :) -steve John Hansen wrote: I realize that's an option, and probably my first choice as well. We all ready utilize many ezmlm mailing lists for teachers, staff, and parents. For this particular situation though the data is kept in a database all ready that has the mail/merge functionality designed for this specific purpose, and it would be nice to keep the data in one place instead of two. Thanks for your suggestion. John Jake Vickers wrote: I believe that chkuser has a hard limit of 254 for the number of recipients due to the string type used in the code. You would need to modify the source code to change the string type to allow larger arrays. (I dimly remember looking into this a couple years ago) Also, it's rather easy to recompile (from source) ezmlm and enable mysql support. It's not in the stock QMT package (and is honestly easier to do in the new version of ezmlm from source). You will need some overrides for removing the old package since qmailadmin depends on it. Jake, Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors? John - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
John Hansen wrote: Jake, Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors? John Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does, since it directly injects the messages.
[qmailtoaster] Advantage/Disadvantage ...??
I'm loading up a fresh QmailToaster (to be used as a cache/backup) and usually I've always been under the assumption that it is best to do away with the LVM groups and format the partitions direct to the drive. Is there an advantage to using LVM vs not using LVM for QmailToaster? I know this is a matter of opinion but I'd like to know what others are doing... Thank you, Patrick M. Ring P. Ring Technologies Louisiana Web Host, LLC. 985-868-4200
Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem
Maybe this can help you: ** Outlook 2003/2007 Select your Mail(Folder); Then click: Edit-Purge Deleted Messages Unfortunately you have to do that for all your folders, but You can add a button for that in your toolbar; There are some scripts available which should help you with that issues, but I have not tried: http://www.outlookcode.com/codedetail.aspx?id=427 In Outlook 2007 it is possible to automatize mail-deletion (which should be available in a similar way in OE): http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HP100804201033.aspx Hope that helps, Johannes Am 24.09.2009 20:23, schrieb Eric Shubert: That's the way Outlook does IMAP all right. Pretty screwy. In order to get the messages to disappear from the screen, go to View--Arrange By--Current View and click Hide messages marked for deletion. I'm not sure off hand when the message actually get deleted. I think there's an option for configuring that, and it's different between O'03 and O'07. FWIW, Outlook will also not save messages in the IMAP Sent folder. You need to create an Email Rule manually to do that. I also create a rule for filing spam. Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Ok, thanks Jake and if I find the solution I'll put in an email to help other users who have the same problem Saludos. borderless_small *Borderless Consulting Group SA de CV.* Noel Alban Rivera Rivera Jefe de Redes y Telecomunicaciones Tel. (915) 633-61-04 Nextel 62*142650*2 */P/**/ Por favor considera el medio ambiente antes de imprimir este e-mail./* -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, use, disclosure or distribution of such confidential information without the written authorization of Borderless Consulting Group is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. By receiving this e-mail you acknowledge that any breach by you and/or your representatives of the above provisions may entitle Borderless Consulting Group to seek for damages. AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este correo electrónico, incluyendo en su caso, los archivos adjuntos al mismo, pueden contener información de carácter confidencial y/o privilegiada, y se envían a la atención única y exclusivamente de la persona y/o entidad a quien va dirigido. La copia, revisión, uso, revelación y/o distribución de dicha información confidencial sin la autorización por escrito de Borderless Consulting Group está prohibida. Si usted no es el destinatario a quien se dirige el presente correo, favor de contactar al remitente respondiendo al presente correo y eliminar el correo original incluyendo sus archivos, así como cualesquiera copia del mismo. Mediante la recepción del presente correo usted reconoce y acepta que en caso de incumplimiento de su parte y/o de sus representantes a los términos antes mencionados, Borderless Consulting Group tendrá derecho a los daños y perjuicios que esto le cause. *From:* Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com] *Sent:* Jueves, 24 de Septiembre de 2009 11:07 a.m. *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Imap Problem Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote: Hi List I have problem whit IMAP account. When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server? Thanks for your help That is how Outlook handles deletion in IMAP. I do not know if there is a workaround for this in Outlook. Other clients do not have the same issue (there are LOTS of web pages complaining about IMAP support in Outlook) -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 |--- - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients
Am Thursday 24 September 2009 22:41:43 schrieb Jake Vickers: John Hansen wrote: Jake, Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors? John Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does, since it directly injects the messages. Hi John, Consider using worldmerge, shareware that works very good and pulls data out of a database. It does not send via outlook but has it's own mailclient. It's not free, but 40$ isn't exaggerated and it does a very good job. This tool sends mails one per one. Only if you use iptables recent, you will have to exclude the senders ip-address from this rule. Andreas - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients:216.81.238.95:qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt e...@shubes.net : client allowed to relay 09-24 14:25:04 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - remote e...@shubes.net (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:25:13 simscan:[3243]:RELAYCLIENT:8.4547s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:e...@shubes.net 09-24 14:31:46 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from e...@shubes.net:: remote mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org:unknown:204.13.248.72 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:31:46 policy_check: remote e...@shubes.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:31:47 simscan:[4066]:CLEAN (0.10/12.00):0.8290s:Re_ Area510.net _ e mail delay:204.13.248.72:e...@shubes.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:38:48 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:: remote h9g3l91:unknown:95.133.78.202 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:38:48 policy_check: remote jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:38:52 simscan:[4776]:CLEAN (5.50/12.00):2.4199s:***SPAM*** Great Rxmedications are at your fingertips:95.133.78.202:jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:40:36 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx:: remote la1ldu3:unknown:84.61.8.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:40:36 policy_check: remote annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:40:39 simscan:[5072]:SPAM REJECT (14.40/12.00):1.8574s:***SPAM*** Do you need to lose_s0me_weight?:84.61.8.95:annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:40:39 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (Your email is considered spam (14.40 spam-hits)): MAILFROM:annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx RCPTTO:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:44:15 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from demell...@gmail.com:: remote mail-fx0-f206.google.com:unknown:209.85.220.206 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:44:15 policy_check: remote demell...@gmail.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:44:16 simscan:[5181]:CLEAN (-0.10/12.00):0.8569s:Re_ 2000 v70r downpipe:209.85.220.206:demell...@gmail.com:c...@yother.com Eric Shubert wrote: That directory contains all of your smtp logs. To view the most recent
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients:216.81.238.95:qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt e...@shubes.net : client allowed to relay 09-24 14:25:04 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - remote e...@shubes.net (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:25:13 simscan:[3243]:RELAYCLIENT:8.4547s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:e...@shubes.net 09-24 14:31:46 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from e...@shubes.net:: remote mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org:unknown:204.13.248.72 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:31:46 policy_check: remote e...@shubes.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:31:47 simscan:[4066]:CLEAN (0.10/12.00):0.8290s:Re_ Area510.net _ e mail delay:204.13.248.72:e...@shubes.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:38:48 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:: remote h9g3l91:unknown:95.133.78.202 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:38:48 policy_check: remote jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:38:52 simscan:[4776]:CLEAN (5.50/12.00):2.4199s:***SPAM*** Great Rxmedications are at your fingertips:95.133.78.202:jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:40:36 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx:: remote la1ldu3:unknown:84.61.8.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:40:36 policy_check: remote annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:40:39 simscan:[5072]:SPAM REJECT (14.40/12.00):1.8574s:***SPAM*** Do you need to lose_s0me_weight?:84.61.8.95:annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:40:39 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (Your email is considered spam (14.40 spam-hits)): MAILFROM:annabellecampo...@imac.edu.mx RCPTTO:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:44:15 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from demell...@gmail.com:: remote mail-fx0-f206.google.com:unknown:209.85.220.206 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:44:15 policy_check: remote demell...@gmail.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:44:16 simscan:[5181]:CLEAN (-0.10/12.00):0.8569s:Re_ 2000 v70r downpipe:209.85.220.206:demell...@gmail.com:c...@yother.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie. c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or through the Webmin interface for checking user mail. I have now discovered it appears to be happening on both of my toasters. The are on different IP's and one is mail only. This particular toaster is web, mail and slave DNS. I have extensively tested the DNS and it's responding as expected. The toaster that is only mail I have only tested through the Squirrelmail interface. composesend5-20 minute delay before it arrives in the inbox. It used to be virtually instantaneous. Neither system is running Spamdyke and both systems are fully up to date. Eric Shubert wrote: Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients:216.81.238.95:qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt e...@shubes.net : client allowed to relay 09-24 14:25:04 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - remote e...@shubes.net (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:25:13 simscan:[3243]:RELAYCLIENT:8.4547s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:e...@shubes.net 09-24 14:31:46 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from e...@shubes.net:: remote mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org:unknown:204.13.248.72 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:31:46 policy_check: remote e...@shubes.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:31:47 simscan:[4066]:CLEAN (0.10/12.00):0.8290s:Re_ Area510.net _ e mail delay:204.13.248.72:e...@shubes.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:38:48 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:: remote h9g3l91:unknown:95.133.78.202 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:38:48 policy_check: remote jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:38:52 simscan:[4776]:CLEAN (5.50/12.00):2.4199s:***SPAM*** Great Rxmedications are at your fingertips:95.133.78.202:jennygreen...@gjensidigenor.no:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:40:36 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Ok. Let's keep things as simple as possible, and look at an email from c...@yother.com and to c...@yother.com. Can you post the message headers of the received message? Maxwell Smart wrote: If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie. c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or through the Webmin interface for checking user mail. I have now discovered it appears to be happening on both of my toasters. The are on different IP's and one is mail only. This particular toaster is web, mail and slave DNS. I have extensively tested the DNS and it's responding as expected. The toaster that is only mail I have only tested through the Squirrelmail interface. composesend5-20 minute delay before it arrives in the inbox. It used to be virtually instantaneous. Neither system is running Spamdyke and both systems are fully up to date. Eric Shubert wrote: Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Are the system clocks sync'd? I've had this bite me a couple times in the past. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com -Original Message- From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie. c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or through the Webmin interface for checking user mail. I have now discovered it appears to be happening on both of my toasters. The are on different IP's and one is mail only. This particular toaster is web, mail and slave DNS. I have extensively tested the DNS and it's responding as expected. The toaster that is only mail I have only tested through the Squirrelmail interface. composesend5-20 minute delay before it arrives in the inbox. It used to be virtually instantaneous. Neither system is running Spamdyke and both systems are fully up to date. Eric Shubert wrote: Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:- :192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients:216.81.238.95:qmailtoaster-list-return-3294- cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt e...@shubes.net : client allowed to relay 09-24 14:25:04 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - remote e...@shubes.net (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:25:13 simscan:[3243]:RELAYCLIENT:8.4547s:- :192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:e...@shubes.net 09-24 14:31:46 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from e...@shubes.net:: remote mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org:unknown:204.13.248.72 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:31:46 policy_check: remote e...@shubes.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:31:47 simscan:[4066]:CLEAN (0.10/12.00):0.8290s:Re_ Area510.net _ e mail delay:204.13.248.72:e...@shubes.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:38:48
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Good thought Michael. If we keep the test case from/to his local domain, that shouldn't matter (I think). Definitely something good to check though. Michael Colvin wrote: Are the system clocks sync'd? I've had this bite me a couple times in the past. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com -Original Message- From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie. c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or through the Webmin interface for checking user mail. I have now discovered it appears to be happening on both of my toasters. The are on different IP's and one is mail only. This particular toaster is web, mail and slave DNS. I have extensively tested the DNS and it's responding as expected. The toaster that is only mail I have only tested through the Squirrelmail interface. composesend5-20 minute delay before it arrives in the inbox. It used to be virtually instantaneous. Neither system is running Spamdyke and both systems are fully up to date. Eric Shubert wrote: Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:- :192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of recipients:216.81.238.95:qmailtoaster-list-return-3294- cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:25:04 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt e...@shubes.net : client allowed to relay 09-24 14:25:04 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - remote e...@shubes.net (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:25:13 simscan:[3243]:RELAYCLIENT:8.4547s:- :192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:e...@shubes.net 09-24 14:31:46 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from e...@shubes.net:: remote mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org:unknown:204.13.248.72 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:31:46 policy_check: remote e...@shubes.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:31:47 simscan:[4066]:CLEAN (0.10/12.00):0.8290s:Re_ Area510.net _ e mail delay:204.13.248.72:e...@shubes.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:38:48 CHKUSER accepted
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Here is the header. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: c...@yother.com Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2/m:51/d:9836 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Message-ID: 4abc0132.3010...@yother.com Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700 From: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com Subject: re: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit test It took 25 minutes to arrive. Even if you take into account that my e mail client only checks mail every ten minutes that's still 15 minute delay. The times are synced. Eric Shubert wrote: Good thought Michael. If we keep the test case from/to his local domain, that shouldn't matter (I think). Definitely something good to check though. Michael Colvin wrote: Are the system clocks sync'd? I've had this bite me a couple times in the past. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com -Original Message- From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie. c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or through the Webmin interface for checking user mail. I have now discovered it appears to be happening on both of my toasters. The are on different IP's and one is mail only. This particular toaster is web, mail and slave DNS. I have extensively tested the DNS and it's responding as expected. The toaster that is only mail I have only tested through the Squirrelmail interface. composesend5-20 minute delay before it arrives in the inbox. It used to be virtually instantaneous. Neither system is running Spamdyke and both systems are fully up to date. Eric Shubert wrote: Those are 2 different messages. Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing that's leading you to conclude that there are delays. Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: I don't see any highlighting. Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :) Maxwell Smart wrote: Eric, OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Look at the times with the highlighted entry below. Between the simscan and CHKUSER is 6 minutes. I may have restarted my toaster to check mail so it may not be relevant, but may indicate that the problem is in the simscan. Here is a clip of entries with my e mail address. 09-24 14:03:10 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from jimmierowe...@estranet.it:: remote hbympm1:unknown:80.37.56.214 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:03:10 policy_check: remote jimmierowe...@estranet.it - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:03:12 simscan:[18048]:CLEAN (4.70/12.00):0.9696s:VicodinES available online today!:80.37.56.214:jimmierowe...@estranet.it:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:14:29 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from oss...@laetitia.area510.net:: remote notify.ossec.net:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:14:29 policy_check: local oss...@laetitia.area510.net - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:14:29 simscan:[2708]:CLEAN (-4.40/12.00):0.7645s:OSSEC Notification - laetitia - Alert level 3:192.168.0.2:oss...@laetitia.area510.net:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted 09-24 14:18:30 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:30 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:30 simscan:[2933]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0315s:- :192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com 09-24 14:18:43 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com:: remote mail.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:216.81.238.95 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient 09-24 14:18:43 policy_check: remote qmailtoaster-list-return-3294-cj=yother@qmailtoaster.com - local c...@yother.com (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) 09-24 14:18:51 simscan:[2950]:CLEAN (-1.60/12.00):7.7640s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] Problems emailing large number of
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Maxwell Smart wrote: Here is the header. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: c...@yother.com Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2/m:51/d:9836 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Message-ID: 4abc0132.3010...@yother.com Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700 From: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com Subject: re: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit test It took 25 minutes to arrive. Even if you take into account that my e mail client only checks mail every ten minutes that's still 15 minute delay. Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one. While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can see what's going on in the logs. Also run a telnet test (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_use_telnet_for_diagnostics) and see if that works okay. Trying to isolate whether it's on the sending side or the receiving side. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Jake Vickers wrote: Maxwell Smart wrote: Here is the header. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: c...@yother.com Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2/m:51/d:9836 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Message-ID: 4abc0132.3010...@yother.com Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700 From: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com Subject: re: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit test It took 25 minutes to arrive. Even if you take into account that my e mail client only checks mail every ten minutes that's still 15 minute delay. Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one. While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can see what's going on in the logs. I was going to suggest that next, but I'd test on the one server. Since you're seeing the delay there, why introduce more complexity? I'd try another test, and grab the send and smtp logs at the same time. The spamd and clam logs wouldn't hurt either. Oh, and we don't see any delay in this email header. Are you using pop3 or imap? I would try clicking get/check mail on the client every 5 seconds or so and see how long it takes to show up. Please try this. Also run a telnet test (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_use_telnet_for_diagnostics) and see if that works okay. Trying to isolate whether it's on the sending side or the receiving side. That's the bottom line. Try to isolate where the delay occurs. I'm guessing it'll be in the back end (delivery) area. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] qtp-extraclam error
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working. If have this in my firewall: -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j ACCEPT Yet I get an email with this message: /etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh: rsync: failed to connect to 88.198.249.108: Connection timed out (110) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(124) [receiver=3.0.5] Anyone have any ideas before I delve into this? -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-extraclam error
Eric Shubert wrote: I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working. If have this in my firewall: -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j ACCEPT Yet I get an email with this message: /etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh: rsync: failed to connect to 88.198.249.108: Connection timed out (110) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(124) [receiver=3.0.5] Anyone have any ideas before I delve into this? Never mind. I see there's a much newer version of the script available. I'm guessing that's the problem. I'll get the newer version included in the upcoming QTP release (after I test it out a bit). -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
OK, I'll do that. I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct? This is what I get when sending. It appears almost instantly. @40004abc207139fae734 tcpserver: pid 15694 from 192.168.0.2 @40004abc207139faeb1c tcpserver: ok 15694 laetitia.area510.net:192.168.0.80:25 :192.168.0.2::53282 @40004abc20720820ba04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted @40004abc207208cb2ad4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient @40004abc207208cb4244 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) @40004abc207208cb462c policy_check: policy allows transmission @40004abc20720ac5d9c4 simscan:[15694]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0279s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com @40004abc20720c09719c tcpserver: end 15694 status 0 I have tried checking the server send/receive mail constantly, but it takes anywhere from 5-25 minutes to respond. I am using IMAP. How do I test the delivery side? I have Telneted and it works fine I just don't know how to authenticate using Telnet so I cannot complete the transaction. Eric Shubert wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Maxwell Smart wrote: Here is the header. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: c...@yother.com Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2/m:51/d:9836 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2) by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 - Message-ID: 4abc0132.3010...@yother.com Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700 From: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com Subject: re: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit test It took 25 minutes to arrive. Even if you take into account that my e mail client only checks mail every ten minutes that's still 15 minute delay. Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one. While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can see what's going on in the logs. I was going to suggest that next, but I'd test on the one server. Since you're seeing the delay there, why introduce more complexity? I'd try another test, and grab the send and smtp logs at the same time. The spamd and clam logs wouldn't hurt either. Oh, and we don't see any delay in this email header. Are you using pop3 or imap? I would try clicking get/check mail on the client every 5 seconds or so and see how long it takes to show up. Please try this. Also run a telnet test (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_use_telnet_for_diagnostics) and see if that works okay. Trying to isolate whether it's on the sending side or the receiving side. That's the bottom line. Try to isolate where the delay occurs. I'm guessing it'll be in the back end (delivery) area. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Maxwell Smart wrote: OK, I'll do that. I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct? If you use qmlog, you'd see the times clearly. ;) # qmlog -f smtp You really want to use qmlog. Trust me on this. It's a powerful tool. This is what I get when sending. It appears almost instantly. @40004abc207139fae734 tcpserver: pid 15694 from 192.168.0.2 @40004abc207139faeb1c tcpserver: ok 15694 laetitia.area510.net:192.168.0.80:25 :192.168.0.2::53282 @40004abc20720820ba04 CHKUSER accepted sender: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt : sender accepted @40004abc207208cb2ad4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com: remote [192.168.0.86]:unknown:192.168.0.2 rcpt c...@yother.com : found existing recipient @40004abc207208cb4244 policy_check: local c...@yother.com - local c...@yother.com (AUTHENTICATED SENDER) @40004abc207208cb462c policy_check: policy allows transmission @40004abc20720ac5d9c4 simscan:[15694]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0279s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com @40004abc20720c09719c tcpserver: end 15694 status 0 Since this happens almost instantaneously, I'd say smtp is not the problem, so spamd and clam logs are probably ok too. 0.0279s is the scan time. That's fast. What about the send log? I have tried checking the server send/receive mail constantly, but it takes anywhere from 5-25 minutes to respond. You mean to show up at the client, I presume. I am using IMAP. courier-toaster I presume. How do I test the delivery side? # cd /home/vpopmail/domains/yother.com/cj/Maildir/new # ls -ltr | tail will show you a list of the 10 most recently received unread files. Do the command to see what's already there, then try another test email, and repeat the ls command to see how long it takes to make it to here. -- -Eric 'shubes' - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Eric Shubert wrote: Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one. While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can see what's going on in the logs. I was going to suggest that next, but I'd test on the one server. Since you're seeing the delay there, why introduce more complexity? I'd try another test, and grab the send and smtp logs at the same time. The spamd and clam logs wouldn't hurt either. Because he's getting the delays on both machines. By performing the tests using both machines we can at least see what a real world transaction will look like. If he's around tomorrow and things aren't too hectic for me, I may try getting him in the IRC and watch my logs as he tries to send me messages and see what shows up on my end. Unless someone else is able to do it before me. Oh, and we don't see any delay in this email header. Are you using pop3 or imap? I would try clicking get/check mail on the client every 5 seconds or so and see how long it takes to show up. Please try this. Try looking at your IMAP logs as well. The delivery side seems to look like it's working okay. Maybe courier is causing the delay. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
OK, a little more info. Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's log, but not int he recipients mailbox. I then did a qmailctl restart on server 2 and it appeared in the recipients mailbox. I am leaning toward something in the latest updates I did, which was about a week ago, but don't know where to start. Thanks for your time as always. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
Maxwell Smart wrote: OK, a little more info. Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's log, but not int he recipients mailbox. I then did a qmailctl restart on server 2 and it appeared in the recipients mailbox. I am leaning toward something in the latest updates I did, which was about a week ago, but don't know where to start. Thanks for your time as always. I'm off to finish a couple house-old things before bed, but try and be more clear in your explanation. You said you send a message from server1 to server2 and it shows in server1's smtp logs, but not in server2's current log. Which current log? (smtp, spam, etc.) The more detail at this point the better. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Area510.net : e mail delay
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what I mean. Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely helpful. I can get you all of the detail you need, but I need to know where to look. Jake Vickers wrote: Maxwell Smart wrote: OK, a little more info. Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's log, but not int he recipients mailbox. I then did a qmailctl restart on server 2 and it appeared in the recipients mailbox. I am leaning toward something in the latest updates I did, which was about a week ago, but don't know where to start. Thanks for your time as always. I'm off to finish a couple house-old things before bed, but try and be more clear in your explanation. You said you send a message from server1 to server2 and it shows in server1's smtp logs, but not in server2's current log. Which current log? (smtp, spam, etc.) The more detail at this point the better. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
