Dear Eric,
First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I want to
thank you for taking over the project now.
As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster spin-off at openSUSE's
build service.
RHEL/CentOS platform is O.K. for me.
Thanks Eric!
--
Constantin IOAJA
Network Administrator C.N.S. Cartel ALFA
On 13.02.2012 19:43, Eric Shubert wrote:
I've done a good deal of thinking about this, and think that it'd be
best to run it by the community at large (not just the developers)
On 02/13/2012 10:58 PM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
What about Ubuntu server, would the team consider getting qmailtoaster
to work with it? If not why?
At some point, perhaps either debian or ubuntu server. In either case
we'd be applying the When in Rome principle, and use debian packages
just to add my voice to the chorus
CentOS platform is O.K. for me.
Thanks Eric!
j shupert
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 02/13/2012 10:58 PM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
What about Ubuntu server, would the team consider getting qmailtoaster
to work with it? If not why?
At some point, perhaps either debian or ubuntu server. In either case
+1 to RHEL/CentOS.
I started some with RH9, and then migrato to Fedora Core 1. That was one of
my biggest mistakes. In two years Fedora reach Core 5. That's when I
decided to move to CentOS. Happy since that day.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Khan Mohamed Ashraf kmash...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:23 AM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote:
Dear Eric,
First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I
want to thank you for taking over the project now.
As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster spin-off
at openSUSE's build service.
Hi Rajesh.
Just wonder if You managed to fix this issue ? I have same error
installing on a testsystem
Regards,
Finn B
Den 23-01-2012 16:38, Rajesh M skrev:
hi
i installed dovecot version 1 on one of my qmailtoaster boxes a few months
ago and it worked successfully.
now i have a new box
Am 14.02.12 16:00, schrieb Eric Shubert:
On 02/14/2012 01:23 AM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote:
Dear Eric,
First, I want to thank Jake for the work in the last years, sencond I
want to thank you for taking over the project now.
As said several times in the past, I am offering a qmailtoaster
Sounds good to me as well.
Thought I'd pop in here and throw my 2 cents in :-)
goes back to his hole
Scott
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers
/me plays wackamole 'Back into that hole Back!!'
2 Distros should be plenty for folks to deal with - helps yall refine the
product and keep support efforts predictable.
-Original Message-
From: South Computers [mailto:i...@southcomputers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:22 AM
Hey Finn,
Which versions are you running? (of vpopmail and dovecot in particular)
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 02/14/2012 09:20 AM, Finn Buhelt wrote:
Hi Rajesh.
Just wonder if You managed to fix this issue ? I have same error
installing on a testsystem
Regards,
Finn B
Den 23-01-2012 16:38, Rajesh
Hey Eric.
SORRY - for the lack of info's. (Dovcot 2.0.17 and Vpopmail-Toaster 5.4.17)
I have installed Qmailtoaster off the shelve from qmailtoaster.org
(doing exactly as Jake in his video - just to be sure)- and Dovecot
2.0.17 just like prescribed in the Wiki. Though I have been around some
Just wanted to double check the versions against what I built dovecot
2.0.17 with, and it's 5.4.17 for vpopmail, so that's ok.
Thanks for the details. Everything sounds kosher to me.
Let's see what Rajesh comes up with, and we'll take it from there.
Thanks for testing!
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Carlos Herrera Polo
carlos.herrerap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello:
Please, can anybody sendme an message file as example ?
Here is an example:
From: u...@example.tld
Subject: I am on vacation
I'm on vacation, please don't disturb!
(do not include the
Eric,
Correct me if I am wrong, but the whole qmailtoaster project started
with the idea to have RPM packages
for a quick deployment under RedHat based OS. Hence, RHEL/CentOS support
only should be fine for most people.
Personally, I started from RedHat 8 and move to Debian, RHEL, Whitebox
I have a qmailtoaster install running on a 64-bit CentOS 5.7.
As far as I can tell, almost all of it works correctly - mail is flowing
in and out successfully.
However, when I try to submit a message on port 587, the connection
closes. The log shows:
2012-02-14 22:26:16.919911500 tcpserver: ok
Hi,
Try to raise even more.
I had this issue also and I just raised the limit.
I believe this one of the reasons qmailtoaster will be distributed in rpm
packages
Regards
On 15 February 2012 05:32, Angus McIntyre an...@pobox.com wrote:
I have a qmailtoaster install running on a 64-bit CentOS
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, even with a softlimit of 102400, it still gives the
same error.
Can you think of anything else I could try?
Angus
Délsio Cabá wrote:
Hi,
Try to raise even more.
I had this issue also and I just raised the limit.
I believe this one of the
Hi,
Try to upgade gcc and recompite it again
On 15 February 2012 05:59, Angus McIntyre an...@pobox.com wrote:
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately, even with a softlimit of 102400, it still gives the
same error.
Can you think of anything else I could try?
Angus
Délsio Cabá
Délsio Cabá wrote:
Try to upgade gcc and recompite it again
gcc seems to be the latest approved version for CentOS. QMT was built with
that version.
I'm also having trouble with POP. The logs don't show any problems (except
for a 'status 256' response) but no mail is transferred.
When I
And the solution was ... raise the softlimit.
But I thought we told you to raise the softlimit? the assembled
members of qmailtoaster-list cried with one voice.
Well, yes. You did. And so did all the four hundred archive postings on
the subject.
But the secret, boys and girls, is that you
On 02/15/12 0:27, James Beam wrote:
/me plays wackamole 'Back into that hole Back!!'
2 Distros should be plenty for folks to deal with - helps yall refine the
product and keep support efforts predictable.
I agree with binary distribution so that can simplify updating system
and I am also
23 matches
Mail list logo
