Jake Vickers wrote:
Ryan Gibbons wrote:
This is a question, not a statement :)
Is there any integration of qmailtoaster into a Web Control Panel, I'm
specifically looking at DTC - http://gplhost.com/software-dtc.html
Details :
I have been looking at a open-source web control panel for my
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ryan Gibbons wrote:
This is a question, not a statement :)
Is there any integration of qmailtoaster into a Web Control Panel, I'm
specifically looking at DTC - http://gplhost.com/software-dtc.html
Details :
I have been looking at a open-source web control panel for my
Dear all,
I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming / outgoing emails of my.domain.com:
.*:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Myquestions are:
Will it create an endless loop if, by any means, someone sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as the
On this day, 09-November-2006 12:23 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
P.V.Anthony wrote:
On this day, 08-November-2006 11:15 PM, Eric Shubes wrote:
IOW, set up an additional SMTP process which doesn't use RBLs and
listens on
whatever port, and have the roaming (or all) users use the whatever
port?
I agree, David. :) (Just ribbing you, Quinn).
Honestly though, I didn't reply simply because I didn't know. I've never
had 'local' users.
This would definitely be a nice piece for the wiki. I'd like to see it under
Tips'N'Tricks, with possibly a link from the FAQs.
I hate to as Quinn to do it
Actually, I've tried to use scripts to filter emails for a user after she's lost all her email in her computer. As I've mentioned before, if the user is in the bcc list, we may not be able to find any info of this user from the email header. My scripthas to go through the send log in order to find
I've seen this also when the SA bayes database is problematic. When
auto-expire is used, it can take quite some time for the initial expiration
cycle, and smtp sessions appear to simply hang.
Are there any errors in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current?
What do you have in your
I haven't tried anything on redhat with DTC. I was looking at running
it on gentoo, but then I thought about running it along with Qmail
Toaster, so now it might move to see how it works on redhat.
The package is built for debian, and he has a makeRedhat script that is
suppose to package it up
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
qmailtoaster package.
The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
I'd recommend you upgrade to the qmail-toaster package on
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com since it supports SMTP-Submission port
587 and forces authentication to be required.
Erik
On 11/12/06, P.V.Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On this day, 09-November-2006 12:23 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Hainarosie Razvan wrote:
I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of
qmailtoaster package.
The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this:
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244)
by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
I am trying to figure out how to make all the email that is forwarded to
an alias (containing external emails) look like its sent from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the original sender.
My server is just a forwarder, but I do not want for the sender to get
bounces from the final destination which
How can I prevent emails with fake headers where the to: address is
different from where the email is actually delivered?
Spammers are getting trickier and its somehow going around my simscan.
Can I use some kind of regex matching with badmailto where it checks if
to: and deliver-to: address are
I too am confronting the issues with simscan not knowing the actual destination
user account. I haven't setup SQL bayes (yet -- I hope to soon) but I am using
per-user SQL user prefs.
I have been living with this limitation because blocking spam at the SMTP level
is very important (IMHO) both
Greetings,
I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
should be installed.
The installation procedure is as follows:
Step 1: Rebuild Source Package
# rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and
should be installed.
The installation procedure is as follows:
Step 1: Rebuild Source Package
# rpmbuild
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looked like spamassassin taking a
while not clamav.
Erik
On 11/12/06, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site
(http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looked like spamassassin taking a
while not clamav.
Erik
Hello
Sure is, but the mail is scanned first by clam, then passed to
spamassassin ?
somehow in that process spamassassin receiving the file has issues
handling it
I will have to
On 11/13/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd recommend you upgrade to the qmail-toaster package onhttp://devel.qmailtoaster.com since it supports SMTP-Submission port587 and forces authentication to be required.
thanks eric i'll try
because my client use national telecommunication
Dear. GuruI have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing that qmail can do. i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete
Hey Alvis,
The Qmail Toaster from Bill's site is no the same Toaster.
I'd wager that there will be a lot of overlap, as they are based on
the same basic architecture, but I couldn't tell ya. The
recommendation I'd expect here would be to get qmhandle
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmhandle)
Dear Erik Thank you for your promt replyi will check and install qmHandle... Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Alvis,The Qmail Toaster from Bill's site is no the same Toaster.I'd wager that there will be a lot of overlap, as they are based onthe same basic architecture, but I
No Worries Alvis,
Hope this works out for ya.
Maybe next time you build the server, you can check out our project:
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/
It's really easy.
Thanks,
Erik
On 11/12/06, alvis bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Erik
Thank you for your promt reply
i will check and install
Hello all,
Please take a look on connection refused. Need help urgently..
@400045580031147b109c tcpserver: status: 1/100@400045580031147b2bf4 tcpserver: pid 3299 from 192.168.150.250@400045580031147b33c4 tcpserver: ok 3299 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25
Hi All,
Thanks for the help, outlook timed out the
connections, I have since increased the timeouts to 3 minutes and it works
fine
ALex
- Original Message -
From:
Bill
Kwok
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 12:18
PM
25 matches
Mail list logo
