Re: [qmailtoaster] QmailToaster integration WebControl panel?
Jake Vickers wrote: Ryan Gibbons wrote: This is a question, not a statement :) Is there any integration of qmailtoaster into a Web Control Panel, I'm specifically looking at DTC - http://gplhost.com/software-dtc.html Details : I have been looking at a open-source web control panel for my server. I am getting tired of making all edits by hand, and being able to give even the basic controls to the webmaster for any given domain. Most of the ones I see want to either use a standard install of a service and then they customize it, even DTC seems to be this way (I haven't installed it, but I am asking a similar question on the other side to be sure). So if you have integrated Qmail Toaster into a general Web Hosting Panel. Or has someone modified some of the QmailToaster Panels to manage other services (primarily apache and an ftp server, though DNS would be another nice addition). Let me know. I had offered about a year or so ago to help Gorrand (I think that was his name) integrate Toaster into his DTC package, but never really got any replies except for that Qmail was in a repo for Debian. At the time his stuff did not install hardly at all on Redhat, so I decided I wouldn't volunteer for any extra work. If his stuff has been fixed to install on RH, I'll download it and see if it can incorporate (unless you've already tried). - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using the Virtualmin module for Webmin and it seems to be working fine. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] QmailToaster integration WebControl panel?
Jake Vickers wrote: Ryan Gibbons wrote: This is a question, not a statement :) Is there any integration of qmailtoaster into a Web Control Panel, I'm specifically looking at DTC - http://gplhost.com/software-dtc.html Details : I have been looking at a open-source web control panel for my server. I am getting tired of making all edits by hand, and being able to give even the basic controls to the webmaster for any given domain. Most of the ones I see want to either use a standard install of a service and then they customize it, even DTC seems to be this way (I haven't installed it, but I am asking a similar question on the other side to be sure). So if you have integrated Qmail Toaster into a general Web Hosting Panel. Or has someone modified some of the QmailToaster Panels to manage other services (primarily apache and an ftp server, though DNS would be another nice addition). Let me know. I had offered about a year or so ago to help Gorrand (I think that was his name) integrate Toaster into his DTC package, but never really got any replies except for that Qmail was in a repo for Debian. At the time his stuff did not install hardly at all on Redhat, so I decided I wouldn't volunteer for any extra work. If his stuff has been fixed to install on RH, I'll download it and see if it can incorporate (unless you've already tried). - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using the Virtualmin module for Webmin and it seems to be working fine. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps
Dear all, I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming / outgoing emails of my.domain.com: .*:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Myquestions are: Will it create an endless loop if, by any means, someone sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as the destination, such as ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):/backup/$1 ? If I need to restore emails (both incoming and outgoing) for a user, what's the best way to filter it out from the backup? Problem here is that emails were forwarded to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . The information of recipient will be lost if he/she was only in the ccor bcc list. If I can't use taps to backup / rstore my users' email in that way, is there any utility that I can use? Thanks in advance. Best regards,Bill
Re: [qmailtoaster] RBL blocks my roaming users
On this day, 09-November-2006 12:23 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: P.V.Anthony wrote: On this day, 08-November-2006 11:15 PM, Eric Shubes wrote: IOW, set up an additional SMTP process which doesn't use RBLs and listens on whatever port, and have the roaming (or all) users use the whatever port? This is what I am doing currently and the roaming users like it. P.V.Anthony If it's not too much trouble, can you write up a how-to in the wiki for others? I've seen this come across the list a couple times, so some people would find it of use. Thanks! Sorry for the late reply. What I do is not very special or very secure. I will just mention it here. If it is good enough then I will add it to the wiki. What I do is just create another one more service of smtp but this smtp runs on another port. Then I disable the RBL blocks on the new smtp. I ask my customers to set their email clients to use the smtp on the new port. P.V.Anthony - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] forwarding mail for real users to their virtual counterpart
I agree, David. :) (Just ribbing you, Quinn). Honestly though, I didn't reply simply because I didn't know. I've never had 'local' users. This would definitely be a nice piece for the wiki. I'd like to see it under Tips'N'Tricks, with possibly a link from the FAQs. I hate to as Quinn to do it since he found the solution, but I suppose that is what makes him most qualified to write it. ;) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well you guys never answered my question, so I had to learn something on my own again (dang) ;-) I found a solution! Well, the rest of the list tend to do something appart from reading your emails Quinn :-P :-P :-P Maybe, you should swap priorities between send-email-to-list and learn-on-my-own-again in /var/qmail/control/troubleshooting/actions to make the lattest being the first. Just kidding :-P Mail to local users STILL is delivered to local users! (Whaaa?) Yeah, mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or `echo 'hello' | mail j` actually sends mail to a local user. The user would still be able to check this mail using their /etc/passwd file and old username if vpopmail was compiled to allow it, but currently it wont: system passwords = OFF --disable-passwd (default) So mail is delivered into ~/Maildir for each user. But they cannot check this mail. So, we must do a forward. To forward a real local user to a remote address, you give the user a ~/.qmail file. This is the qmail-version of the .forward file. So, for example... [EMAIL PROTECTED]/0 control]$cat /home/j/.qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] It *does not work* to put the qmail file in: /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-j because this place only works for users that don't exist (local or virtual). So now I will make a script to go through all local user home directories, and create the necessary Maildir and .qmail file and direct to their main email address (e.g. /home/j/.qmail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Quinn Nice research :-) On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:50:44 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote: I'm still trying to troubleshoot this... On a qmail system, what is the difference between these two? echo hello | mail -s 'testing1' root; echo hello | formail -A 'Subject: testing2' | sendmail root; Q On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:00:53 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 10 18:02:24 2006 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23776 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2006 18:02:24 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23769 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2006 18:02:24 - DomainKey-Status: no signature Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 23659, pid: 23665, t: 5.6275s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2183 spam: 3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mailserver.strangecode.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.qmailtoaster.com) (38.99.66.144) by mailserver.strangecode.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Nov 2006 18:02:18 - Received-SPF: pass (mailserver.strangecode.com: SPF record at qmailtoaster.com designates 38.99.66.144 as permitted sender) Received: (qmail 811 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2006 18:02:05 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: mailto:qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Delivered-To: mailing list qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Received: (qmail 805 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2006 18:02:05 - Received-SPF: none (ns1.qmailtoaster.com: domain at strangecode.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:00:53 -0800 From: Quinn Comendant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 (GMessage framework 1.3.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.3.9b5 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] forwarding mail for real users to their virtual counterpart A related error with messages intended for [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Hi. This is the qmail-send program at two.strangecode.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, I couldn't find any host named localhost.mailserver.strangecode.com. (#5.1.2) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. [...] On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:57:26 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote: With sendmail I would have just added a /home/mmartin/.forward file. I tried adding
Re: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps
Actually, I've tried to use scripts to filter emails for a user after she's lost all her email in her computer. As I've mentioned before, if the user is in the bcc list, we may not be able to find any info of this user from the email header. My scripthas to go through the send log in order to find out which email the user should has received and who's the sender. Then by comparing the time stamp and the sender of emails, I can locate the email. My worry is that the possibility of getting wrong email is still high. For example, if a sender sent multiple emails, with different sizes,within short period of time, will the send logrecord emails in way which is different from the time stamp of the email files? Wouldanyone show me a better way to filter out theemails? Best regards,Bill On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming / outgoing emails of my.domain.com: .*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My questions are:1. Will it create an endless loop if, by any means, someone sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?Don't know, test it!2. Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as thedestination, such as ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):/backup/$1 ? I think you can't but you can allways make a an email account and modify it's .qmail for putting all the mail on a specific maildir or whatever3. If I need to restore emails (both incoming and outgoing) for a user, what's the best way to filter it out from the backup?Problem here isthat emails were forwarded to the [EMAIL PROTECTED].Theinformation of recipient will be lost if he/she was only in the cc or bcclist.Tap is not thought exactly for backups and restores.Is for archiving (say, monitoring, legal obligations, limited backup ofcertain email etc)I'm certainly sure that you can allways make scripts for finding specific e-mails, anyway.4. If I can't use taps to backup / rstore my users' email in that way,is there any utility that I can use?A plain old backup utility should work, tar for example. I use amanda (http://www.amanda.org/) for network backups of whole racksand works like a charm, but you can allways use a priopietary one like Veritas BackupExec or something like that. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill-QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate emails on ezmlm lists and in general
I've seen this also when the SA bayes database is problematic. When auto-expire is used, it can take quite some time for the initial expiration cycle, and smtp sessions appear to simply hang. Are there any errors in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current? What do you have in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf? Try running # sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint Any errors from that? Michael Amster wrote: The machine is not swapping, and DNS is running fast. Try telneting to port 25 of koala.webeasy.com - should come back in 2s. -MA Jake Vickers wrote: Michael Amster wrote: I have been seeing a problem on the toaster where emails from some people send to me multiple times. This is especially annoying to people on some ezmlm lists I run. In particular, the domain netrin.com (some friends of mine) I always get duplicates. Looks like the same delivery maybe 5 or six times. Has anyone seen this on their qmailtoaster and/or have some hints on what to do? Duplicates are usually linked to low resources (memory) or the smtp daemon taking to long. Can also be caused by LONG DNS lookups, but in my experience it has been because of low memory. Swapping is no good. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] QmailToaster integration WebControl panel?
I haven't tried anything on redhat with DTC. I was looking at running it on gentoo, but then I thought about running it along with Qmail Toaster, so now it might move to see how it works on redhat. The package is built for debian, and he has a makeRedhat script that is suppose to package it up for redhat, but I'm not sure how it works. I will see if I can get a test server and play with it. Me and another gentlemen over at the Gentoo forums are talking about creating a proper ebuild for it, so if we get that done, I am sure Redhat would be much harder, but I could be wrong. Jake Vickers wrote: Ryan Gibbons wrote: This is a question, not a statement :) Is there any integration of qmailtoaster into a Web Control Panel, I'm specifically looking at DTC - http://gplhost.com/software-dtc.html Details : I have been looking at a open-source web control panel for my server. I am getting tired of making all edits by hand, and being able to give even the basic controls to the webmaster for any given domain. Most of the ones I see want to either use a standard install of a service and then they customize it, even DTC seems to be this way (I haven't installed it, but I am asking a similar question on the other side to be sure). So if you have integrated Qmail Toaster into a general Web Hosting Panel. Or has someone modified some of the QmailToaster Panels to manage other services (primarily apache and an ftp server, though DNS would be another nice addition). Let me know. I had offered about a year or so ago to help Gorrand (I think that was his name) integrate Toaster into his DTC package, but never really got any replies except for that Qmail was in a repo for Debian. At the time his stuff did not install hardly at all on Redhat, so I decided I wouldn't volunteer for any extra work. If his stuff has been fixed to install on RH, I'll download it and see if it can incorporate (unless you've already tried). - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin please help
Hainarosie Razvan wrote: I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of qmailtoaster package. The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this: Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244) by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Nov 2006 11:42:22 - Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 - Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100) by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 - From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA== Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it. PLease help me, Thanks, Razvan What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] RBL blocks my roaming users
I'd recommend you upgrade to the qmail-toaster package on http://devel.qmailtoaster.com since it supports SMTP-Submission port 587 and forces authentication to be required. Erik On 11/12/06, P.V.Anthony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On this day, 09-November-2006 12:23 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: P.V.Anthony wrote: On this day, 08-November-2006 11:15 PM, Eric Shubes wrote: IOW, set up an additional SMTP process which doesn't use RBLs and listens on whatever port, and have the roaming (or all) users use the whatever port? This is what I am doing currently and the roaming users like it. P.V.Anthony If it's not too much trouble, can you write up a how-to in the wiki for others? I've seen this come across the list a couple times, so some people would find it of use. Thanks! Sorry for the late reply. What I do is not very special or very secure. I will just mention it here. If it is good enough then I will add it to the wiki. What I do is just create another one more service of smtp but this smtp runs on another port. Then I disable the RBL blocks on the new smtp. I ask my customers to set their email clients to use the smtp on the new port. P.V.Anthony - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] simscan clam and spamassasin please help
Hainarosie Razvan wrote: I am using a fresh install of Centos 4.2 and the stable version of qmailtoaster package. The problem is with my mail headers that looks like this: Received: from unknown (HELO mail.wavin.ro) (82.76.33.244) by ares.itcompany.ro with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Nov 2006 11:42:22 - Received-SPF: none (ares.itcompany.ro: domain at wavin.ro does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 - Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3060, pid: 3063, t: 0.2296s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 Received: from unknown (HELO raluca) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.10.100) by mail.wavin.ro with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2006 11:19:56 - From: sss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:19:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000__01C7065D.3E543660 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AccGTHBYvrpWPJSET72raOCVU0DbNA== Why I can not find spam at the scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2186 line Maybe is a stupid question but I am not able to solve it. PLease help me, Thanks, Razvan What does your /var/qmail/control/simcontrol file contain? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] my simcontrol file is: :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif and my tcp.smtp file look like this 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=15,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=40,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=20,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=3,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Rewrite sender envelope when forwarding to alias
I am trying to figure out how to make all the email that is forwarded to an alias (containing external emails) look like its sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the original sender. My server is just a forwarder, but I do not want for the sender to get bounces from the final destination which is hosted somewhere else as its totally out of my control and it reveals who my alias is forwarding to. Is there any solution or some kind of switch/trick to do this? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Preventing Fake Headers
How can I prevent emails with fake headers where the to: address is different from where the email is actually delivered? Spammers are getting trickier and its somehow going around my simscan. Can I use some kind of regex matching with badmailto where it checks if to: and deliver-to: address are the same? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] using (dot) .qmail instead of simscan
I too am confronting the issues with simscan not knowing the actual destination user account. I haven't setup SQL bayes (yet -- I hope to soon) but I am using per-user SQL user prefs. I have been living with this limitation because blocking spam at the SMTP level is very important (IMHO) both for simply keeping 90% of incoming mail off the server, and also for informing senders that their messages were not received (instead of dropping them into a void). The solution I've been considering is to run two instances of spamassassin: one through simscan, with a global bayes db blocking messages scoring about XX (I'm using 8 actually), and a second instance executed after mail has entered the system (at the mail-delivery level) that uses per-user bayes and prefs. Yes, scanning some messages twice. The disadvantages of this I can think of are: - more server load - more complex administration - bayes may not be trained as accurately because most mail will be ham (?) The advantages: + SMTP-level blocking of most spam + per-user bayes and prefs + two layers of SA bayes filtering might catch more spam (?) Maybe the simcan-level SA can run all the non-bayes tests, and use mailfilter to rewrite the X-Spam-* headers as X-Spam-A-*, while the qmail-level SA can run nothing BUT the bayes tests and have its headers rewriten as to X-Spam-B-*, the add the scores together into X-Spam-Status. This would help server load by splitting the work between the two SAs, and you could see headers for each. I'm sure a very clever (and simple, as opposed to the above) solution to this soon. DSPAM support might help! Specific comments: So I found a solution that works. But I'm not sure if there are negative implications in doing this (i.e. Performance issues, dropped emails, etc). The load on SA will be the same but I think the load on all the other qmail processes will increase. 2. Created a .qmail file in my account folder (/home/vpopmail/domains/somedomain.com/someuser/) that contains the following: Be aware this file will be overwritten or deleted by QmailAdmin when the user edits any of their forwards/autoresponder settings! It would be better to place the file at: /home/vpopmail/domains/somedomain.com/.qmail-someuser |/usr/bin/spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/bin/maildrop -A 'Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster' /etc/mail/mailfilter It sure would be easier if you could just have one global .qmail file. I'm not sure how to do that, but you could use $(echo $RECIPIENT | sed -r 's/[^-]+-//') in place of [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems to work great. I just wonder once I put it into production with over 100 domains how well it will work. I know I'll have to write some scripts to update everyone's .qmail file, but that is fine as long as I know it will work under a load. Let us know how it works! Quinn - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
Greetings, I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site (http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and should be installed. The installation procedure is as follows: Step 1: Rebuild Source Package # rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm Step 2: Stop qmail # service qmail stop Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package # rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster Step 4: Install new package # rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm Step 5: Rebuild cdb's # service qmail cdb Step 6: Start qmail # service qmail start Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
Erik Espinoza wrote: Greetings, I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site (http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and should be installed. The installation procedure is as follows: Step 1: Rebuild Source Package # rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm Step 2: Stop qmail # service qmail stop Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package # rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster Step 4: Install new package # rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm Step 5: Rebuild cdb's # service qmail cdb Step 6: Start qmail # service qmail start Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello I just upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm but noticed a very big difference in the scan delay and a lot of warning on the bays lock file 2006-11-12 23:31:41.749324500 [26901] info: prefork: child states: BIBI 2006-11-12 23:31:47.828847500 [27855] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.052835500 [26914] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.535812500 [26914] info: spamd: identified spam (3.9/3.2) for clamav:89 in 19.5 seconds, 1024 bytes. I have a very busy smail server but I had to revert back to clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm and all went back to normal something like that 2006-11-12 23:37:44.078152500 [28288] info: spamd: clean message (2.5/3.2) for clamav:89 in 0.8 seconds, 1836 bytes. This smtp is used for scanning, with clam and spam enabled for about 3000 domains I installed my own 0.88.6 using the .88.5 spec file /I modified of course) but didnt notice that big difference of course I didnt test with the 3000 domains enaled on this server (will do maybe tomorrow) Just passing the info ... Cheers -P
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looked like spamassassin taking a while not clamav. Erik On 11/12/06, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: Greetings, I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site (http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and should be installed. The installation procedure is as follows: Step 1: Rebuild Source Package # rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm Step 2: Stop qmail # service qmail stop Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package # rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster Step 4: Install new package # rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm Step 5: Rebuild cdb's # service qmail cdb Step 6: Start qmail # service qmail start Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello I just upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm but noticed a very big difference in the scan delay and a lot of warning on the bays lock file 2006-11-12 23:31:41.749324500 [26901] info: prefork: child states: BIBI 2006-11-12 23:31:47.828847500 [27855] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.052835500 [26914] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.535812500 [26914] info: spamd: identified spam (3.9/3.2) for clamav:89 in 19.5 seconds, 1024 bytes. I have a very busy smail server but I had to revert back to clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm and all went back to normal something like that 2006-11-12 23:37:44.078152500 [28288] info: spamd: clean message (2.5/3.2) for clamav:89 in 0.8 seconds, 1836 bytes. This smtp is used for scanning, with clam and spam enabled for about 3000 domains I installed my own 0.88.6 using the .88.5 spec file /I modified of course) but didnt notice that big difference of course I didnt test with the 3000 domains enaled on this server (will do maybe tomorrow) Just passing the info ... Cheers -P - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm
Erik Espinoza wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looked like spamassassin taking a while not clamav. Erik Hello Sure is, but the mail is scanned first by clam, then passed to spamassassin ? somehow in that process spamassassin receiving the file has issues handling it I will have to test and debug on the dev server tomorrow, I updated on the production and I cant play too much with it now :) bad timing my simcontrol file looks like that : :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=6.5,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif only difference is : I changed simscan to SPAM-DROP instead of SPAM_REJECT for the rest, it is pretty much standard to your rpms But it had to do with the new update package cow with clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm it is really smooth no lock, very short scan time Sorry cant give more infos right now before I check a bit more it has the same patch clamav-0.88.5.patch.bz2 clamav-0.88.x.patch.bz2 kinda strange the behaviour I noticed ... On 11/12/06, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: Greetings, I've released an updated clamav-toaster package on the devel site (http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/). This is a security upgrade and should be installed. The installation procedure is as follows: Step 1: Rebuild Source Package # rpmbuild --rebuild --with FLAG clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm Step 2: Stop qmail # service qmail stop Step 3: Remove old clamav-toaster package # rpm -e --nodeps clamav-toaster Step 4: Install new package # rpm -Uhv /path/to/clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.arch.rpm Step 5: Rebuild cdb's # service qmail cdb Step 6: Start qmail # service qmail start Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello I just upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.88.6-1.3.6.src.rpm but noticed a very big difference in the scan delay and a lot of warning on the bays lock file 2006-11-12 23:31:41.749324500 [26901] info: prefork: child states: BIBI 2006-11-12 23:31:47.828847500 [27855] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.052835500 [26914] warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists 2006-11-12 23:31:48.535812500 [26914] info: spamd: identified spam (3.9/3.2) for clamav:89 in 19.5 seconds, 1024 bytes. I have a very busy smail server but I had to revert back to clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.i386.rpm and all went back to normal something like that 2006-11-12 23:37:44.078152500 [28288] info: spamd: clean message (2.5/3.2) for clamav:89 in 0.8 seconds, 1836 bytes. This smtp is used for scanning, with clam and spam enabled for about 3000 domains I installed my own 0.88.6 using the .88.5 spec file /I modified of course) but didnt notice that big difference of course I didnt test with the 3000 domains enaled on this server (will do maybe tomorrow) Just passing the info ... Cheers -P - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] RBL blocks my roaming users
On 11/13/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd recommend you upgrade to the qmail-toaster package onhttp://devel.qmailtoaster.com since it supports SMTP-Submission port587 and forces authentication to be required. thanks eric i'll try because my client use national telecommunication internet provider ( that had a lot not capable employee) always block by rbl so i always remove all rbl in holidays so my client can use outlook in homes/mobile regards
[qmailtoaster] qmail mail queue get filled up
Dear. GuruI have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing that qmail can do. i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete these queue from webmin web base linux manager. is there any way i can reduce this queue overhead, where do i start to check where is wrong... Please advice as i am newbie to linux and qmailThank You Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail mail queue get filled up
Hey Alvis, The Qmail Toaster from Bill's site is no the same Toaster. I'd wager that there will be a lot of overlap, as they are based on the same basic architecture, but I couldn't tell ya. The recommendation I'd expect here would be to get qmhandle (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmhandle) and see if this'll fix it. However your best bet would be to contact that community for further guidance. Thanks, Erik On 11/12/06, alvis bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear. Guru I have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing that qmail can do. i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete these queue from webmin web base linux manager. is there any way i can reduce this queue overhead, where do i start to check where is wrong... Please advice as i am newbie to linux and qmail Thank You Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail mail queue get filled up
Dear Erik Thank you for your promt replyi will check and install qmHandle... Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Alvis,The Qmail Toaster from Bill's site is no the same Toaster.I'd wager that there will be a lot of overlap, as they are based onthe same basic architecture, but I couldn't tell ya. Therecommendation I'd expect here would be to get qmhandle(http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmhandle) and see if this'll fix it.However your best bet would be to contact that community for further guidance.Thanks,ErikOn 11/12/06, alvis bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: Dear. Guru I have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing that qmail can do. i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete these queue from webmin web base linux manager. is there any way i can reduce this queue overhead, where do i start to check where is wrong... Please advice as i am newbie to linux and qmail Thank You Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.-QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail mail queue get filled up
No Worries Alvis, Hope this works out for ya. Maybe next time you build the server, you can check out our project: http://www.qmailtoaster.com/ It's really easy. Thanks, Erik On 11/12/06, alvis bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Erik Thank you for your promt reply i will check and install qmHandle... Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Alvis, The Qmail Toaster from Bill's site is no the same Toaster. I'd wager that there will be a lot of overlap, as they are based on the same basic architecture, but I couldn't tell ya. The recommendation I'd expect here would be to get qmhandle (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmhandle) and see if this'll fix it. However your best bet would be to contact that community for further guidance. Thanks, Erik On 11/12/06, alvis bond wrote: Dear. Guru I have Instal Qmail Toaster from Bill site it is wounderfull thing that qmail can do. i have up and running this qmail about a month. recently i have noted that qmail server queue get filled up to 200 and more at qmail queue waiting to send or receive, normally i have to delete these queue from webmin web base linux manager. is there any way i can reduce this queue overhead, where do i start to check where is wrong... Please advice as i am newbie to linux and qmail Thank You Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] connect() : Connection Refused
Hello all, Please take a look on connection refused. Need help urgently.. @400045580031147b109c tcpserver: status: 1/100@400045580031147b2bf4 tcpserver: pid 3299 from 192.168.150.250@400045580031147b33c4 tcpserver: ok 3299 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1834@400045580031160a2c7c tcpserver: status: 2/100@40004558003116232ed4 tcpserver: pid 3300 from 192.168.150.250@40004558003116234644 tcpserver: ok 3300 main.etech.net.my:192.168.150.199:25 :192.168.150.250::1835@40004558003b0b385e2c CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt : sender accepted@40004558003b37fd947c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote smoothwall.etech.net.my:unknown:192.168.150.250 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient@40004558003c08160f8c connect(): Connection refused@40004558003c084d445c tcpserver: end 3299 status 0 Please..
Re: [qmailtoaster] POP mail
Hi All, Thanks for the help, outlook timed out the connections, I have since increased the timeouts to 3 minutes and it works fine ALex - Original Message - From: Bill Kwok To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 12:18 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP mail WIll it be possible that Outlook gets timeout while downloading email / waiting your server to reply? Try to increase the timeout period to, say, 5 minutes and see if it works better. Have you tried to enter the IP address, instead of mail.domain.com,in Outlook? If it works fine, then may be it's a problem of your DNS server. Best regards, Bill On 11/11/06, Kisakye Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, I have a working toaster and have dns set to; webmail.domain.com for webmail (squirrel) mail.domain.com for smtp and POP SMTP and POP works fine although i notice that sometimes in the morning outlook cant find the mail.domain.com and sometimes i need to restart my toaster box before everything gets back fine When this happens I can still access the box from webmail, its just POP thats out MY POP logs dont seem to catch anything wrong Any Help ALex
