That is the exact mail I am getting. I just downloaded the stock list
from rulesemporium. Ran spamassassin -lint and then restarted spamd,
Hopefully today I'll see a drop in the number I get :)
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello,
I got the same problem whateverthis spam is.
It has been sent as
Shelly wrote:
Im thinking of using the QmailToaster Plus to upgrade my old (read 18
months) Toaster install -
Which version(s)?
# rpm -qa | grep toaster
Im not sure if its been covered, but this will
continue to run the current qmail setup, build the new version in the
background
Pretty
Quinn Comendant wrote:
I too am confronting the issues with simscan not knowing the actual destination
user account. I haven't setup SQL bayes (yet -- I hope to soon) but I am using
per-user SQL user prefs.
I have been living with this limitation because blocking spam at the SMTP level is
I gotta say, I don't understand the problem here.
I have two domains on a toaster. I can get to qmailadmin via
http://domain1.com/qmailtoaster and/or http://domain2.com/qmailtoaster. I
can log into either domain using the url from either one.
I've (simply) set up virtual domains in httpd.conf
Nozy wrote:
Hi Eric
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:10 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
Also, is your SA log showing any errors?
SA log ?? sorry man not sure what log that is
/var/log/qmail/spamd/current
Has your SA bayes db journal ever sync'd?
# sudo -u vpopmail -H spamassassin -D bayes --lint
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also fixed the naming for mdk2006
From mdk2006 there is only one version / year
and there is no 103 version only 2006
same is true for 2007
and from2007 there is no mdk anymore it is now mdv
so the correct build options should be
--with mdk2006
--with
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts.http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html
slamp slamp wrote:
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for
sendmail converts.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html
It certainly looks like it would be useful for sendmail converts, or for use
with additional packages that expect certain sendmail behaviour(s).
Jake Vickers wrote:
Matt Decker wrote:
I'm migrating my qmail toaster from a site wide spamassassin setup to
a per user (MySQL based) setup. The problem I had with this was that
simscan doesn't know the final main account delivery email address
for forwards and domain aliases. This is
I agree it is a good add into the toaster.
Eric Shubes wrote:
slamp slamp wrote:
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for
sendmail converts.
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html
It certainly looks like it would be useful for sendmail converts, or for use
with
Greetings everyone,
I recently upgraded one of my (fairly old) qmail-toasters using the
upgrade script, but it doesn't seem as if SMTP-AUTH is working properly
now. Other than requiring a few new RPM's (libtool bzip2-devel
gmp-devel) to be installed (via yum), the installation went smoothly.
Joseph Lundgren wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I recently upgraded one of my (fairly old) qmail-toasters using the
upgrade script, but it doesn't seem as if SMTP-AUTH is working properly
now. Other than requiring a few new RPM's (libtool bzip2-devel
gmp-devel) to be installed (via yum), the
One of my keenly observant mail list users realized that the email
repeats come when my qmailtoaster sends an SPF softfail header. In this
case the mail is sent via gmail.com, but the user put the To: field as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe that hotmail.com and gmail.com use SPF.
Should I
Greetings,
What toaster version did you upgrade from?
Circa August of 2005:
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.2.5.src.rpm
clamav-toaster-0.86.2-1.2.5.src.rpm
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.2.5.src.rpm
courier-imap-toaster-3.0.8-1.2.6.src.rpm
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.2.6.src.rpm
Joseph Lundgren wrote:
Greetings,
What toaster version did you upgrade from?
Circa August of 2005:
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.2.5.src.rpm
clamav-toaster-0.86.2-1.2.5.src.rpm
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.2.5.src.rpm
courier-imap-toaster-3.0.8-1.2.6.src.rpm
Jeremy
Suexec follows a stringent set of criteria before it will execute a CGI. Check
this list of 20 criterion and see if you've configured qmailadmin to pass all
of them:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/suexec.html#model
Quinn
It should work the same as the normal .qmail file.
Try something simple, just to be sure the file works. Create a .qmail-username
file with the following for testing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send an email to username and see if the message is forwarded.
Also try fixing the perms on this file:
Hello,
I use the latest build of qmail toaster. I have a quick
question on SMTP authentication. I setup my email account at my house and
attempted to send through it to make sure my users will be able to send mail
from home through the new server. The following is the log when I try:
The current version of qmailadmin doesn't do this for me. What version are you
running? Have you customized the install at all via qmailadmin-toaster.spec?
Quinn
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:16:03 -0600, Matt Decker wrote:
Whenever someone updates their password their folder location is
appended
All,
I've uninstalled:
spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6 simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.2
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2 clamav-toaster-0.88.5-1.3.5.
My SMTP connection greeting is as fast as it was prior to upgrade.
Are you running a caching DNS server?
Yes, but not on the toaster server.
BTW,
Good. You've narrowed it down somewhat. Is smtp-auth working now or not?
Unfortunately, you can't very well try adding them back one at a time, since
simscan controls the rest of them.
This makes no sense to me, as the packages you've uninstalled don't come
into play until after the data's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I use the latest build of qmail toaster. I have a quick question on SMTP
authentication. I setup my email account at my house and attempted to
send through it to make sure my users will be able to send mail from
home through the new server. The following
From the main site. Standard Microsoft Outlook Authentication settings.
Under the Outgoing Server setting in Outlook for the account it is set to:
My outgoing server (SMTP) requires authentication
Bullet is next to: Use same settings as my incoming mail server
-Original Message-
Check vuserinfo on your account and ensure that vpopmail has given
permission for smtp-auth.
Erik
On 11/14/06, Dan Herbon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the main site. Standard Microsoft Outlook Authentication settings.
Under the Outgoing Server setting in Outlook for the account it is set to:
This is the output:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
name: username
passwd: **
clear passwd: *
comment/gecos: username
uid:0
gid:0
flags: 0
gecos: username
limits: No user limits set.
dir:
All,
SMTP-AUTH is working now, although I'm getting errors in a different
part of the sending process. The authentication process IS properly
working at this time (although, I don't understand what I might have
done to fix the problem).
I had to reinstall the following, because the server
Also, in my case, I had to turn SELinux off.
Quinn Comendant wrote:
Jeremy
Suexec follows a stringent set of criteria before it will execute a CGI. Check this list of 20 criterion and see if you've configured qmailadmin to pass all of them:
I'm using Virtualmin to do web hosting. It creates the httpd.conf as
follows using suexec.
VirtualHost 192.168.1.2:80
SuexecUserGroup #501 #500
ServerName mydomain.com
ServerAlias www.mydomain.com
DocumentRoot /home/mydomain/public_html
ErrorLog /home/mydomain/logs/error_log
CustomLog
Hey all,
I've completed the wiki documentation for qt-plus v0.2.
In addition, I cut the v0.2.1 release. Changes since v0.2:
.) sa-stats added
.) fixed SA_RESTART bug in etc/rulesdujour/config (program is now just
qmail-spam (once again), not qtp-qmail-spam).
You only need to upgrade if you're
Jeremy Runner wrote:
I'm using Virtualmin to do web hosting. It creates the httpd.conf as
follows using suexec.
Do you have shell access to the machine (or will virtualmin let you) change
this VirthostHost to something more custom? Be warned that VirtualMin might
overwrite your hand-edited
Hey all,
Just wondering My scanning system seems to be working pretty well. I am
noticing one thing though it seems as if the forwards like sales@ info@
that actually get forwarded onto the proper people are not getting their
mail scanned for viruses I can understand why It would not be deleting
31 matches
Mail list logo
