[qmailtoaster] question about received headers

2007-10-05 Thread davide bozzelli
Hi I've seen a lot of smtp servers blocks messages with rbl checks based on the ip extracted from the received fields. My opinion is that this kind of checks is stupid cause everytime a legitimate mails exit from a legitimate mail server, in most of the cases (if not all) the received fields

Re: [qmailtoaster] question about received headers

2007-10-05 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
The rbl checks that qmailtoaster uses only check the last hop from the outgoing mail server to your receiving mail server. In other words, not an issue for us... Erik On 10/5/07, davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've seen a lot of smtp servers blocks messages with rbl checks based

[qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Roxanne Sandesara
My qmail-toaster seems to have hundreds, if not thousands of messages undelivered and sitting in the queue. This has reached the point that local messages, from users who are on the server to other users on the server, are not being delivered, even hours after they have been sent. I have

RE: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Kyle Quillen
Hello, I just had this issue the other day. Have you looked at the tool qmHandle If you just type that in it will give you a list of options on how to deal with the queue. What do you have your queue lifetime set to? If you have Qmail toaster plus installed then you have qmHandle. Thanks

[qmailtoaster] router email to remote host per user

2007-10-05 Thread jeremy
I need a little guidance. I am hosting a domain for a company on a qmailtoaster. They recently purchased an Exchange server because they needed some of its features. But they only purchased a limited number of licenses. I would like the qmailtoaster to recieve email for all users but forward

Re: [qmailtoaster] router email to remote host per user

2007-10-05 Thread jeremy
I need a little guidance. I am hosting a domain for a company on a qmailtoaster. They recently purchased an Exchange server because they needed some of its features. But they only purchased a limited number of licenses. I would like the qmailtoaster to recieve email for all users but

Re: [qmailtoaster] router email to remote host per user

2007-10-05 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
Config the Exchange server to think it's primary mail address is exchange.domain.com. Forward all accounts that should go to exchange from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make Exchange send out e-mail as domain.com, instead of exchange.domain.com. Erik On 10/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Roxanne Sandesara
I changed my queue lifetime to one hour (3600) qmHandle was useful for seeing what is in the queue. But I still can't get it to /process/ the queue. On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Kyle Quillen wrote: Hello, I just had this issue the other day. Have you looked at the tool qmHandle If you

RE: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Kyle Quillen
Try this command qmHandle -M That will delete all of the email that was not able to be sent. See if that lessens the queue. The other day I just ended up deleting the entire queue. And all was well. Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Roxanne Sandesara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Roxanne Sandesara
Wiping things out of the queue is not helping. It's not delivering anything to the users. However, mail is getting out. Is there something that could be preventing qmail from delivering messages to the users, thusly forcing the local queue sky-high? On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Kyle Quillen

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Natalio Gatti
what can you see in your /var/log/qmai/send/current log? what is your /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote value? On 10/5/07, Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wiping things out of the queue is not helping. It's not delivering anything to the users. However, mail is getting out. Is

[qmailtoaster] error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'

2007-10-05 Thread Jim Shupert, Jr.
Friends, I have a blckberry user who has the complaint of 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)' I find this in the wiki - ok , that sounds dead on I keep getting 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid

RE: [qmailtoaster] error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'

2007-10-05 Thread Helmut Fritz
i like #4, but can a regular expression for the domain, like: *blackberry.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 be used instead of an i.p. address? _ From: Jim Shupert, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:17 PM To:

Re: [qmailtoaster] error 571-'sorry, sender address has invalid format (#5.7.1 - chkuser)'

2007-10-05 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
I believe if you edit /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run and remove -H so that reverse dns is done, you should be able to do it with =.blackberry.net:allow,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 I am not one hundred percent positive, on this but if I am interpretting the tcprules man page correctly, this should

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Todd W
From: Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60 Any idea what 'unable to open todo' means? Or what I should do about it? /var/log/qmail/send current: Script started on Fri 05 Oct 2007 04:52:25 PM EDT ]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# qmlog send

Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender

2007-10-05 Thread Roxanne Sandesara
I've got nearly 50% free space on the disk. On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Todd W wrote: From: Roxanne Sandesara [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60 Any idea what 'unable to open todo' means? Or what I should do about it? /var/log/qmail/send current: Script