I seem to be having lots of problems lately
This is a X-Post from SA list .
K Anand wrote:
I have whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my conf.
As per the docs, they say that whitelist_from will act on
Envelope-Sender
Resent-Sender
X-Envelope-From
From
Reply
I think this happened while trying some things in another thread about trying
to get DK working.
Here's the problem now;
authlib: up (pid 2323) 4230 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2321) 4230 seconds
imap4: up (pid 796) 0 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 801) 0 seconds
pop3: up (pid 2333) 4230 seconds
Does any one have experience with Simscan Segmentation fault?
I have recompiled and still the same issue.
I am running it on Fedora 7.
Ernesto Vargas-Azofeifa
Senior Web Developer IT Manager
Macromedia Certified Cold Fusion Web Developer
Linux-Apache-MySql-PHP advocate.
Hi Erik,
Sounds like I better keep in tune and download CentOS then.
For production servers I much prefer your binary approach as this is
more aligned to a 'toaster' solution.
Done my time fiddling with linux compatibility instead of functionality
and know where I prefer to be.
Thanks for your
Resolved:
SELINUX was still enabled. My mistake.
Janno Sannik wrote:
System is centos 5, x86_64, 4GB ram, AMD 6000+
I Just got off with clean install of qmailtoaster but clamav won't start:
authlib: up (pid 22884) 32983 seconds
clamd: up (pid 24671) 0 seconds
imap4: up (pid 22936) 32983
Is this official? DJB hasn't updated his site yet:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
-- Sam Clippinger
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
As the Qmail code has been released as public domain now, it shall be
possible for full binary distributions!
E
http://cr.yp.to/talks/2007.11.02/slides.pdf
Page 11
EE
On Nov 16, 2007 12:13 PM, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this official? DJB hasn't updated his site yet:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
-- Sam Clippinger
Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
As the Qmail code has been
A few users reported that email was being very slow to deliver, even
internal messages. I checked the server, using many of the tools and
bits I discovered the last time I had this problem. The queue is
definitely backlogged, currently at 9,000+ messages, and growing by a
bit every minute.
I'm quite sure that atleast some packages need to be rebuilt and
furthermore to be sure...all of them.
This isn't actually such a big work, since I have upgraded from centos
4.3 i386 to centos 4.5 x86_64.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I've got what's been so far a stable toaster
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
A few users reported that email was being very slow to deliver, even
internal messages. I checked the server, using many of the tools and
bits I discovered the last time I had this problem. The queue is
definitely backlogged, currently at 9,000+ messages, and growing
Ernesto Vargas wrote:
Does any one have experience with Simscan Segmentation fault?
I have recompiled and still the same issue.
I am running it on Fedora 7.
Search the old messages - I seem to remember Shubes having (or helping)
someone troubleshoot a simscan segfault using recordio.
As the Qmail code has been released as public domain now, it shall be
possible for full binary distributions!
E
On Nov 15, 2007 11:58 PM, Bryan Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,
Sounds like I better keep in tune and download CentOS then.
For production servers I much prefer your
Greetings,
I've got what's been so far a stable toaster install on a CentOS 4.5
platform.
What I'm wondering is, if I were to upgrade the OS in place to CentOS 5.x,
would this break the toaster, forcing a fresh reinstall, or would
everything likely keep working?
TIA,
--Duncan
I stopped the server and ran qfixq. That found quite a bit and fixed
it. Restarted, and now things are coming through fine. I do have a
lot of deferrals due to being unable to open SMTP back to the
supposed server of origin for messages, but that's all spam.
Thanks again, Jake.
Roxanne
Any thoughts folks?
---
I think this happened while trying some things in another thread about trying
to get DK working.
Here's the problem now;
authlib: up (pid 2323) 4230 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2321) 4230 seconds
imap4: up (pid 796) 0 seconds
imap4-ssl: up (pid 801) 0 seconds
pop3: up (pid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In ps;
Seems to be finding the FQDN alright.
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l qm249.domain.com -x /etc/tcprules.
This is obviously a problem and part of why IMAP isn't starting, right?
root 4835 0.0 0.0 00 ? Z01:12 0:00 [tcpserver] defunct
root 4840
Right -- I've seen that. I've also seen posts from Russ Nelson saying
that DJB has promised, in email to him (Russ), to release qmail to the
public domain. But neither of those sources seem to be very official,
so I was wondering if there was anything else to go by.
-- Sam Clippinger
Erik
Post your run file for imapd and pop3d.
I posted the IMAP to the other reply.
#!/bin/sh
PASSPROG=/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
HOSTNAME=`hostname --fqdn`
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 900 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -c 200 0 110 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup $HOSTNAME \
$PASSPROG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Post your run file for imapd and pop3d.
I posted the IMAP to the other reply.
#!/bin/sh
PASSPROG=/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
HOSTNAME=`hostname --fqdn`
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 900 \
/usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -c 200 0 110 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
Nothing other than DJB saying it will be done in 07.
Erik
On Nov 16, 2007 1:16 PM, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right -- I've seen that. I've also seen posts from Russ Nelson saying
that DJB has promised, in email to him (Russ), to release qmail to the
public domain. But neither
What does your run file for imap look like? And did you adjust these
files in any way?
No, I've not changed anything. I was working on the DK problem and didn't have
to mess with any startup scripts and such.
It's the default file. I found a message about removing hostname which I
tried,
On 11/16/2007 02:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts folks?
---
I think this happened while trying some things in another thread about trying
to get DK working.
Here's the problem now;
authlib: up (pid 2323) 4230 seconds
clamd: up (pid 2321) 4230 seconds
imap4: up (pid 796) 0
Have you tried a reboot since then? Also, what does your hosts file look
like?
Yes, I have. I've rebooted several times after making adjustments here and
there and so far, no luck.
At this point, it's got both the hostname and the domainname information.
27.0.0.1 localhost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What it's basically saying is that it doesn't know what port to use, which
is normally defined in the run file - this error could also be caused by
another program using the same port.
Did you change the hostname at all? Is it in the hosts file?
That is one of the
What it's basically saying is that it doesn't know what port to use, which
is normally defined in the run file - this error could also be caused by
another program using the same port.
Did you change the hostname at all? Is it in the hosts file?
That is one of the things I was trying various
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried a reboot since then? Also, what does your hosts file look
like?
Yes, I have. I've rebooted several times after making adjustments here and
there and so far, no luck.
At this point, it's got both the hostname and the domainname information.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a typo :).
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:49:09 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried a reboot since then? Also,
what does your hosts file look like?
Yes, I have. I've rebooted several times after making adjustments here
Yes, I even tried this and it didn't work.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:22:06 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it's a typo :). On Fri, 16 Nov 2007
17:49:09 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried a reboot since then? Also, what does your
Could found the thread. Any idea how was it call?
Ernesto Vargas-Azofeifa
Senior Web Developer IT Manager
Macromedia Certified Cold Fusion Web Developer
Linux-Apache-MySql-PHP advocate.
Visit: Photos.aero |
- Original Message
From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a typo :).
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:49:09 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you tried a reboot since then? Also,
what does your hosts file look like?
Yes, I have. I've rebooted several times after making adjustments here
What does 'netstat -vl' show?
I'm off to dinner, so I may not pop back in tonight.
Ok, tomorrow then, thanks so much for the help!
I see domain in there??? Is that the problem?
#netstat -vl
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign
list the following situation:
put the capture of top
top - 20:11:44 up 6:10, 1 user, load average: 1.10, 1.18, 1.10
Tasks: 172 total, 1 running, 171 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 33.9% us, 4.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 39.9% id, 21.9% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 2075128k total,
Hi,
I was just wondering as to what are the advantages for QMT in moving from a
32 bit to 64 bit OS?
Thanks
Ashraf
On Nov 16, 2007 7:45 PM, Janno Sannik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm quite sure that atleast some packages need to be rebuilt and
furthermore to be sure...all of them.
This isn't
Found the problem but now need to understand why it's happening?
Because this was intermittent, I didn't see it every time I looked at the
system processes. This time I noticed the following;
root 27992 0.0 0.1 1784 612 ?R00:23 0:00 hostname --fqdn
So, of course, I tried;
34 matches
Mail list logo
