Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my
toaster the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to
the same mail server. These
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to djbdns.
Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote:
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my toaster
the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart
Peter,
Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised?
CJ
Peter Tan wrote:
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to
djbdns. Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
Some additional
admin wrote:
Actually i want to update hourly my clamav installation but i don't
wanto to receive the state check email hourly. Or at last i want to
change the address where this mail is sent.
Cannot find the mail command in the unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh script.
Thanks,
Kartone
Il giorno
Jake Vickers wrote:
Kartone wrote:
No, mail continues arrive hourly.
I changed the MAILTO option in the crontab as suggested by Jake.
Did you change the config file options?
Kartone wrote:
Yes, crontab MAILTO option.
I was talking about the options in the script's config file.
*
Hi,
thanks very much for the clearly aswer, i hope this will resolve all
my problems. Thanks to everybody in ml too. This is a great place to
solve problems :-)
Kartone
Il giorno 24/set/2009, alle ore 10.32, Constantin IOAJA ha scritto:
admin wrote:
Actually i want to update hourly my
Hi list,
I had upgraded qmail-toaster to 1.3.19, but I fell it works more slowly
then 1.3.18 and I can't find any errors.
I changed to 1.3.18 , It works well and faster.
Any one have same problem?
--
Regards,
Kevin Qiu
SA
Beijing
Foxit
Hi Everyone,
I got a bounced message from my toaster server. And the reason for bounce is
mentioned below:
Could not deliver message to the following recipient(s):
Failed Recipient: Local Emailid
Reason: Remote host said: 421 Refused. Your reverse DNS entry does not
resolve.
The email-id which
Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com
mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote:
Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
The List.
First off I must apologize for stupidity on my part.
If I have offended anybody I offer my sincere
Kevin Qiu - 邱波 - Foxit BJ - SA wrote:
Hi list,
I had upgraded qmail-toaster to 1.3.19, but I fell it works more slowly
then 1.3.18 and I can't find any errors.
I changed to 1.3.18 , It works well and faster.
Any one have same problem?
Can you define slow?
What makes you think it's
That looks like you have spamdyke installed.
You can whitelist the IP of the server in your whitelist_ip-file that is
configured in your spamdyke.conf
Just put the IP on a line in that file.
If you have for example:
ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/control/whitelist_ip
in your spamdyke.conf
you add
Thanks Andreas.
Thats solve my *temporary* problem until there ISP set proper RDNS name.
Regards,
Amit
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Andreas Galatis a...@unet.de wrote:
That looks like you have spamdyke installed.
You can whitelist the IP of the server in your whitelist_ip-file that is
CJ,
Check system log to see if there were unknown logins, like user id 'admqd'.
I also received complaints from other sites that my server was sending SPAM.
Didn't have time to check other problems, users were screaming...
Just switched to djbdns and problem solved.
Peter
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009
Greetings list,
I have a problem with one of my users who is trying to send out a large
amount of emails (900+) at one time. We are a school, and we try to send
out regular updates to our alumni regarding upcoming events and interests.
These emails are generated via a database program, then sent
On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote:
What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out
without
errors?
you need to set up an ezmlm mailing list on the toaster and have your
user send mass emails via this list rather than via Outlook. that's
what mailing
Steve Huff wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote:
What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out
without
errors?
you need to set up an ezmlm mailing list on the toaster and have your
user send mass emails via this list rather than via Outlook. that's
Hi List
I have problem whit IMAP account.
When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a
middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have
eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server?
Thanks for your help
Noel Rivera (Border Less) wrote:
Hi List
I have problem whit IMAP account.
When I delete files from my outlook with IMAP configuration only put a
middle line and not deleted from the server, what should I do to have
eliminated these messages are deleted directly on the server?
Ok, thanks Jake and if I find the solution I'll put in an email to help
other users who have the same problem
Saludos.
borderless_small
Borderless Consulting Group SA de CV.
Noel Alban Rivera Rivera
Jefe de Redes y Telecomunicaciones
Tel. (915) 633-61-04
Nextel 62*142650*2
P Por
That's the way Outlook does IMAP all right. Pretty screwy.
In order to get the messages to disappear from the screen, go to
View--Arrange By--Current View and click Hide messages marked for
deletion.
I'm not sure off hand when the message actually get deleted. I think
there's an option for
John Hansen
Director of Technology
Cotter Schools
1115 W. Broadway
Winona, MN 55987
507-453-5000
www.cotterschools.org
Steve Huff wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 11:55 AM, John Hansen wrote:
What do I need to change/update in order for these to be sent out
without
errors?
you need to set
John Hansen wrote:
Jake,
Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many
recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors?
John
Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does, since
it directly injects the messages.
I'm loading up a fresh QmailToaster (to be used as a cache/backup) and
usually I've always been under the assumption that it is best to do away
with the LVM groups and format the partitions direct to the drive. Is
there an advantage to using LVM vs not using LVM for QmailToaster?
I know this
Maybe this can help you:
** Outlook 2003/2007
Select your Mail(Folder); Then click: Edit-Purge Deleted Messages
Unfortunately you have to do that for all your folders, but You can add a
button for that in your toolbar; There are some scripts available which should
help you with that issues,
Am Thursday 24 September 2009 22:41:43 schrieb Jake Vickers:
John Hansen wrote:
Jake,
Are you suggesting that even if I use ezmlm for sending to this many
recipients (over 254) that I'll still receive chkuser errors?
John
Nope. ezmlm does not have the same limitation that chkuser does,
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the
ordinary. Look at the times with the
Those are 2 different messages.
Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing
that's leading you to conclude that there are delays.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie.
c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or from cjyot...@pacbell.net to
c...@yother.com and vice versa it takes anywhere from 5 minutes to 20
minutes for the e mail to arrive. This occurs whether I use
Thunderbird (IMAP), Squirrelmail or
Ok. Let's keep things as simple as possible, and look at an email from
c...@yother.com and to c...@yother.com. Can you post the message headers of
the received message?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
If I send an e mail to myself whether from a local account ie.
c...@yother.com to c...@yother.com or
Are the system clocks sync'd? I've had this bite me a couple times in the
past.
Michael J. Colvin
NorCal Internet Services
www.norcalisp.com
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:00 PM
To:
Good thought Michael. If we keep the test case from/to his local domain,
that shouldn't matter (I think). Definitely something good to check though.
Michael Colvin wrote:
Are the system clocks sync'd? I've had this bite me a couple times in the
past.
Michael J. Colvin
NorCal Internet
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s
scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s
scanners: attach:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9488, pid: 9492, t: 0.0154s
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working.
If have this in my firewall:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j ACCEPT
Yet I get an email with this message:
/etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh:
rsync: failed to connect to 88.198.249.108: Connection
Eric Shubert wrote:
I just ran qtp-extraclam see how it's working.
If have this in my firewall:
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 873 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j
ACCEPT
Yet I get an email with this message:
/etc/cron.hourly/unofficial-clamav-sigs.sh:
rsync: failed to connect to
OK, I'll do that.
I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct?
This is what I get when sending. It appears almost instantly.
@40004abc207139fae734 tcpserver: pid 15694 from
192.168.0.2
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, I'll do that.
I can get the log snippet by watching this tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current correct?
If you use qmlog, you'd see the times clearly. ;)
# qmlog -f smtp
You really want to use qmlog. Trust me on this. It's a powerful tool.
This is what I get when
Eric Shubert wrote:
Since you have two mail servers, send a message from the one that has
the LEAST amount of traffic, and send a message to the other one.
While you do this, grab both the send log from the sending server and
the SMTP log from the receiving server and post those so we can
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what I
mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and how
to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely helpful.
I can get you all of the detail you need, but I need to know where to
42 matches
Mail list logo
