Guess so, here are the log entry from trying to send from squirrelmail:
@40004af52e171ed800f4 tcpserver: status: 1/100
@40004af52e171edc332c tcpserver: pid 5743 from 127.0.0.1
@40004af52e171edc3714 tcpserver: ok 5743 blue:127.0.0.1:25 :127.0.0.1:
:32941
@40004af52e171f093e6c
W dniu 06.11.2009 18:39, Jake Vickers pisze:
I'll update the patch before too long, but those 3 fixes do not imply
anything to do with logging.
It may be that logging was added, but notes were not made. We'll see.
The problem is more complicated. I applied this new patch (Centos 5.4
x86_64)
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 06.11.2009 18:39, Jake Vickers pisze:
I'll update the patch before too long, but those 3 fixes do not imply
anything to do with logging.
It may be that logging was added, but notes were not made. We'll see.
The problem is more complicated. I applied this
W dniu 07.11.2009 20:14, Eric Shubert pisze:
Not that it would fix QMT's encryption, but I wonder what happens with
spamdyke handling TLS. Of course, this would do nothing for outbound
email.
Are you observing this breakage on the outbound or inbound side, or
only when QMT is used on both
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 07.11.2009 20:14, Eric Shubert pisze:
Not that it would fix QMT's encryption, but I wonder what happens with
spamdyke handling TLS. Of course, this would do nothing for outbound
email.
Are you observing this breakage on the outbound or inbound side, or
W dniu 07.11.2009 20:44, Eric Shubert pisze:
I still wonder about what spamdyke would do then. I don't know if
spamdyke writes this information at all, or if qmail-smtp does it. Is
it possible that perhaps spamdyke is doing TLS, so qmail-smtp doesn't
see it? When spamdyke does TLS, it passes
W dniu 07.11.2009 21:21, Aleksander Podsiadly pisze:
Now I find [...]
Sorry for ma English, should be ,,found''. :|
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Aleksander Podsiadły
mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl
jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl
ICQ: 201121279
gg: 9150578
