Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Andreas Galatis
Hi YongSan, I tested to connect to your server on port 25. It takes about 2-3 min to get the greeting-banner (220 localhost.localdomain - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP) For me that looks like your server takes ages to resolve my senders reverse dns. Did you configure the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi, I tried the following on the mail server itself and i got the reply immediately. [r...@mail init.d]# nslookup 122.175.72.62 Server: 127.0.0.1 Address:127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: 62.72.175.122.in-addr.arpa name =

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Jake Vickers
On 07/12/2010 02:24 AM, Poh Yong Hwang wrote: Hi, I tried the following on the mail server itself and i got the reply immediately. [r...@mail init.d]# nslookup 122.175.72.62 Server: 127.0.0.1 Address:127.0.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: 62.72.175.122.in-addr.arpa name

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Poh Yong Hwang
Hi, It seems that if i use port 587 it does not have the slowness issue.. [r...@cp root]# time telnet mail.popular.com.sg 25 Trying 117.120.3.103... Connected to mail.popular.com.sg (117.120.3.103). Escape character is '^]'. 220 localhost.localdomain - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
It looks like you have problems solving your local name (the name of server where tcpserver is running). Check your local name in DNS, and add -l name to your tcpserver command line. Tonino Poh Yong Hwang ha scritto: Hi, Here is my resolv.conf : search mail.popular.com.sg

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

2010-07-12 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
Ok, here is Timo's response to my question: Am 11.07.2010 um 21:01 schrieb Timo Sirainen: On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Waschbuesch wrote: 1.) Is there any danger regarding maildir consistency in directly moving mail items about? No. Assuming you use mv and not cp (and it's

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Jake Vickers
On 07/12/2010 02:48 AM, Poh Yong Hwang wrote: Hi, It seems that if i use port 587 it does not have the slowness issue.. [r...@cp root]# time telnet mail.popular.com.sg http://mail.popular.com.sg 25 Trying 117.120.3.103... Connected to mail.popular.com.sg http://mail.popular.com.sg

[qmailtoaster] help with some spam

2010-07-12 Thread David Milholen
I have these in my logs .. Found it when I was trimming some entries in my domain greylist This is not an account I have in my domain.. 44b2a950.4000106 My domain is wletc.com Looks like multiple ips with some multiple rdns. I am just going to add this one to the senders blacklist file. Is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: spam email routing query

2010-07-12 Thread Andreas Galatis
Hi. My experience was only when I deleted files. I think dovecot does not complain if there are new files in the folder, but if there are files missing, it complains. I think it's normel that programs deliver mail into the folder, but normaly, whitout dovecot no file is deleted. So dovecot

[qmailtoaster] Re: Slowness in smtp

2010-07-12 Thread Eric Shubert
Is sounds as though there is something amiss in your djbdns configuration. If you really want to use djbdns for some reason, I've found The Linux Cookbook by Carla Schroeder to be a good reference for that. I don't presently have my copy nearby. I've found that it's much easier to use the

[qmailtoaster] Re: help with some spam

2010-07-12 Thread Eric Shubert
If all of your submissions come from authenticated connections (which they should), you can blacklist your own domain. I know this sounds counter-intuitive, but since all of your domains authenticate, the only rejections will be those who claim to come from your domain but fail to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: setting up the virtual drive for scanning

2010-07-12 Thread David Milholen
Eric, I did exactly what you said and I do remember this type of setup doing work with the cacti project.. Been a while since I have had to pay attention to Hardware like drives and memory. I can definitely see a difference on the 3 different clients I have to do some real world testing.

[qmailtoaster] Re: setting up the virtual drive for scanning

2010-07-12 Thread Eric Shubert
David Milholen wrote: Eric, I did exactly what you said and I do remember this type of setup doing work with the cacti project.. Been a while since I have had to pay attention to Hardware like drives and memory. I can definitely see a difference on the 3 different clients I have to do some

Re: [qmailtoaster] setting up the virtual drive for scanning

2010-07-12 Thread David Milholen
On 7/11/2010 10:41 AM, Jake Vickers wrote: On 07/10/2010 07:44 PM, David Milholen wrote: Hi All, Jake this may be your territory but anyways I am wanting to add a small virtual drive for doing my clam scans. Not sure where I should begin. Thanks I actually had done a video on this -

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: setting up the virtual drive for scanning

2010-07-12 Thread David Milholen
On 7/12/2010 8:51 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: David Milholen wrote: Eric, I did exactly what you said and I do remember this type of setup doing work with the cacti project.. Been a while since I have had to pay attention to Hardware like drives and memory. I can definitely see a difference

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: help with some spam

2010-07-12 Thread David Milholen
On 7/12/2010 8:28 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: If all of your submissions come from authenticated connections (which they should), you can blacklist your own domain. I know this sounds counter-intuitive, but since all of your domains authenticate, the only rejections will be those who claim to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: help with some spam

2010-07-12 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
I was able to get rid of that sort of spam by signing all outgoing mail with Domainkeys and setting the policy record for Domainkeys to signify: This server signs ALL outgoing mail. Incoming policy can be adjusted to reject mail where there is no signature in such a case. Martin Am