Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Remo Mattei
Yes, I now have two of the qmail servers on 7 with .1 I need to migrate some domains like 20 or so from an old 5.x centos.. Remo > On Aug 16, 2018, at 18:37, Eric Broch wrote: > > Did the first one upgrade to 1.03-3.1 okay? > > > On 8/16/2018 7:05 PM, Remo Mattei wrote: >> So some

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Eric Broch
Did the first one upgrade to 1.03-3.1 okay? On 8/16/2018 7:05 PM, Remo Mattei wrote: So some interesting thing!! The second server I tried to run the .1 update and it went but I could not get stuff back on running. Luck me I had a .tg of the bin for qmail and what I did I downgraded, then

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Remo Mattei
So some interesting thing!! The second server I tried to run the .1 update and it went but I could not get stuff back on running. Luck me I had a .tg of the bin for qmail and what I did I downgraded, then restore the .gz and was able to get it back alive.. One of the major issues was I could

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Andrew Swartz
Eric, That's interesting. Those tcprules are that which was present after the upgrade. I do not know if it changed them or left them default from qt-install. I only copied tcp.smtp to tcp.smtps and changed the ciphers at the end of the line. I definitely did not add domain keys to it. Also,

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Eric Broch
Andy, I noticed your tcprules include domain keys, be aware that if you upgrade to qmail-1.03-3.1 domainkeys have been removed. Eric On 8/16/2018 5:25 PM, Andrew Swartz wrote: Eric, Your request prompted me to look more closely at these files. I believe that installing

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Andrew Swartz
Eric, Your request prompted me to look more closely at these files. I believe that installing qmail-1.03-3.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm overwrote my /var/qmail/supervise/smtps/run with a new one which is missing the 'export REQUIRE_AUTH=1' line.  The new one does correctly have 'export SMTPS=1'.  The new

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Eric Broch
Remo, In the '/var/qmail/supervise/smtps/run' file it should be 'export SMTPS=1' client should be configure with ssl/tls, port 465, and normal password. Eric On 8/16/2018 3:59 PM, Remo Mattei wrote: Here is what I had to change since by default did not change it.. On my smtps run file I

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Remo Mattei
Here is what I had to change since by default did not change it.. On my smtps run file I had to change this export SMTPS=1 To this export SMTPAUTH=“!” To get it to work. Remo > On Aug 16, 2018, at 14:33, Eric Broch wrote: > > Andy, > > Would you mind sharing your tcprules files and

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Eric Broch
Andy, Would you mind sharing your tcprules files and smtp/smtps run scripts? Eric On 8/16/2018 3:03 PM, Andrew Swartz wrote: Eric, I already had smtps installed. The new package seems to have overwritten the prior files. However, that was minimally problematic because I have smtps

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Andrew Swartz
Eric, I already had smtps installed. The new package seems to have overwritten the prior files. However, that was minimally problematic because I have smtps configured a little differently than standard. I have supervise/smtps/run specify a separate tcprules.d file for smtps. This allows me to

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-16 Thread Remo Mattei
I will try on my other qmail 7 server. Let you know.  dal mio iPhone X > Il giorno 16 ago 2018, alle ore 10:35, Eric Broch > ha scritto: > > Thanks, Andy. > > It installed SMTPS, correct? > > If you felt bold, I needed some folks to test 1.03-3.1. ;-) > > Eric > > >> On 8/16/2018

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-15 Thread Eric Broch
I ran this 1.03-3 version for several months with no issues, and haven't heard anything from the community on it. I personally upgraded to 1.03-3.1 (in the development tree) now on my own production machine. In this version I take all the patches (below), carrying over some, updating some and

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-15 Thread Eric Broch
It doesn't really matter. I usually do everything as root (probably not a good idea) in /root. On 8/15/2018 10:18 AM, Andrew Swartz wrote: Eric, Thanks. What is the proper destination folder for the rpm (to allow the 'yum localupdate' command)? -Andy On 8/15/2018 7:25 AM, Eric Broch

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-15 Thread Andrew Swartz
Eric, Thanks. What is the proper destination folder for the rpm (to allow the 'yum localupdate' command)? -Andy On 8/15/2018 7:25 AM, Eric Broch wrote: > wget https://www.qmailtoaster.org/qmail-1.03-3.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm > > yum localupdate qmail-1.03-3.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm > > > On 8/15/2018

Re: [qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-15 Thread Eric Broch
wget https://www.qmailtoaster.org/qmail-1.03-3.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm yum localupdate qmail-1.03-3.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm On 8/15/2018 9:22 AM, Andrew Swartz wrote: I just realized that the qt-install script did not install qmail-1.03-3 on my new centos-7 toaster. Does anyone have experience with the

[qmailtoaster] status of qmail-1.03-3 CentOS 7 ?

2018-08-15 Thread Andrew Swartz
I just realized that the qt-install script did not install qmail-1.03-3 on my new centos-7 toaster. Does anyone have experience with the qmail-1.03-3 update? -Andy smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature