Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread d...@acbsco.com
Hi Eric, I must be missing something here.  I decided to give postfix and followed your quickie howto, but I cannot send email out. First this is what I have done. Stopped qmail-smtpd and qmail-send using svc -d service name and adding the "down" files to the proper directories. I used yum on

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread d...@acbsco.com
Eric and list, I am sending emails now.  I changed the line echo "mail.domain.com:587 postmas...@domain.com:password"  sasl_passwd and used echo "192.168.5.2:587 " sasl_passwd ran postmap sasl_passwd restarted postfix and emails started coming through. I still get some certificate

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread Aleksander Podsiadly
W dniu 13.11.2009 20:15, d...@acbsco.com pisze: Eric and list, I am sending emails now. I changed the line echo mail.domain.com:587 postmas...@domain.com:password mailto:postmas...@domain.com:password sasl_passwd and used echo 192.168.5.2:587 sasl_passwd ran postmap sasl_passwd

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread Eric Shubert
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote: W dniu 13.11.2009 20:15, d...@acbsco.com pisze: Eric and list, I am sending emails now. I changed the line echo mail.domain.com:587 postmas...@domain.com:password mailto:postmas...@domain.com:password sasl_passwd and used echo 192.168.5.2:587

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread Eric Shubert
d...@acbsco.com wrote: Eric and list, I am sending emails now. I changed the line echo mail.domain.com:587 postmas...@domain.com:password sasl_passwd and used echo 192.168.5.2:587 sasl_passwd ran postmap sasl_passwd restarted postfix and emails started coming through. I still get

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread d...@acbsco.com
Aleksander, yeah kinda weird posting questions on qmail-toaster page regarding postfix.  However, if you read the entire post, I was following a previous post by Eric Shubert on Oct. 29th about using postfix to securely relay mail to a qmailtoaster server. Eric, did you mention you this would

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-13 Thread Eric Shubert
That'd be great Dave. Please have a go at it. There is editing help on the wiki site. d...@acbsco.com wrote: Aleksander, yeah kinda weird posting questions on qmail-toaster page regarding postfix. However, if you read the entire post, I was following a previous post by Eric Shubert on Oct.

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-11 Thread Eric Shubert
I think that postfix is your best route as well. Just to clarify the log messages a little, when spamdyke issues a DENIED_OTHER message, it's saying that something else (other than spamdyke) rejected the message. This could be absolutely anything further down the pipe. spamdyke is simply

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-11 Thread Michael Colvin
: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work? Thanks guys for all the input. I should be more descriptive with my issue. First, my users do not connect to any email accounts on my internal servers. I have different applications running on my internal servers that need to send

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Shubert
d...@acbsco.com wrote: Hello list, I have been using eMPF for about one year now and it does a great job limiting email accounts and/or who they can send or receive emails from. Thanks for including it in the distribution. I have noticed that eMPF requires that the user sending the email

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread d...@acbsco.com
Thanks Eric, the internal servers are running netqmail-1.06. So what you are saying is to make sure the qmail daemons are not running by stopping them and moving the run scripts out of /service directory. Then install postfix via yum and configure it per your instructions in the quickie guide

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Shubert
d...@acbsco.com wrote: Thanks Eric, the internal servers are running netqmail-1.06. So what you are saying is to make sure the qmail daemons are not running by stopping them and moving the run scripts out of /service directory. Right. Or you can stop them by adding a file named 'down' to the

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Shubert
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF requires authentication to work? Michael, good question. I hate this answer, because that's the way its always been. :) Actually, I tried removing the contents of /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on the internal server and restarted qmail. I get the same darn

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Michael Colvin
  -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:46 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work? That's a valid way of doing things, but it presents

[qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Shubert
: [qmailtoaster] eMPF requires authentication to work? Michael, good question. I hate this answer, because that's the way its always been. :) Actually, I tried removing the contents of /var/qmail/control/smtproutes on the internal server and restarted qmail. I get the same darn error message in the log

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: eMPF requires authentication to work?

2009-11-10 Thread Jake Vickers
Eric Shubert wrote: Good question. I don't know the answer to that off hand. Michael Colvin wrote: Oh, I totally agree, Eric. I guess my point was trying to find out if there was any reason they needed to do it that way... Really, the eMPF functionality should be on his internal server, not