Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Quinn Comendant wrote: I tried compiling usendmail on my RHEL 4 dev server but it failed. I have posted the issue to the usendmail list. Alternatively, I have heard good things about using new-inject instead of qmail-inject, available in the mess822 package.

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Jake Vickers
Quinn Comendant wrote: I tried compiling usendmail on my RHEL 4 dev server but it failed. I have posted the issue to the usendmail list. Alternatively, I have heard good things about using new-inject instead of qmail-inject, available in the mess822 package. http://cr.yp.to/mess822.html

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Quinn Comendant
I thought about this, stopped thinking about it, now am thinking about it again. In /etc/php.ini there is a config option: sendmail_path = Which can be set to a shell wrapper script: #!/bin/sh sed s/\r\n?/\n/g | qmail-inject Which should work in all cases. Maybe. You would hope so.

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Quinn Comendant wrote: I thought about this, stopped thinking about it, now am thinking about it again. In /etc/php.ini there is a config option: sendmail_path = Which can be set to a shell wrapper script: #!/bin/sh sed s/\r\n?/\n/g | qmail-inject Which should work in all

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Quinn Comendant
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:06:00 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote: I'm thinking you're on to something here. We should probably find the 'best' sendmail/qmail-inject replacement available and include it in the toaster. Are you volunteering? I agree. I'm totally unqualified to make a call on this. I'll

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-15 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Quinn Comendant wrote: On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:06:00 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote: I'm thinking you're on to something here. We should probably find the 'best' sendmail/qmail-inject replacement available and include it in the toaster. Are you volunteering? I agree. I'm totally unqualified to

[qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-14 Thread slamp slamp
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts.http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-14 Thread Eric \Shubes\
slamp slamp wrote: Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts. http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html It certainly looks like it would be useful for sendmail converts, or for use with additional packages that expect certain sendmail behaviour(s).

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion

2006-11-14 Thread Guillermo Villasana
I agree it is a good add into the toaster. Eric Shubes wrote: slamp slamp wrote: Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts. http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html It certainly looks like it would be useful for sendmail converts, or for use with