I agree with Eric on the Spamdyke portion. I was thinking the same thing,
but didn't have an answer for the SpamAssassin portion, so I didn't reply!
:-)
I run SpamDyke more for the benefit of my server. The benefit for the
client is secondary. If you disable it, your certainly going to
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active and not tell him about it. Then
again, if he insists on receiving spam, I'd charge him extra for the load
: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:38 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives
to have to resolve the issue...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric
AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active
