t; > Carl
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: あいざわひろし [mailto:cobo...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:05 AM
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster and clamav version: 0.102.2
> >
> >
t; Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:05 AM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster and clamav version: 0.102.2
>
> hello qmailtoaster-list
>
> yesterday I found freshclam saying
> |WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
&g
No. it's the way the mysql dB is set up
Eric's email, phone
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:00 PM -0700, "Boheme" wrote:
What does the ‘many domain option for vpopmail’ provide? Is that the component
that gives us virtual domain hosting?
-Sent from my Pip-Boy 3000
> On 20/02/202
What does the ‘many domain option for vpopmail’ provide? Is that the component
that gives us virtual domain hosting?
-Sent from my Pip-Boy 3000
> On 20/02/2020, at 5:04 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
>
> I'll get the new version out in the next couple of days.
>
> Ultimately with CentOS 8, and maybe
I'll get the new version out in the next couple of days.
Ultimately with CentOS 8, and maybe 7 at a later date, I'm moving to the
standard repos (EPEL or CentOS) for clamav and spamassassin.
I'm considering the same with Dovecot (moving away from the many domain
option for vpopmail) and its n
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10:05 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster and clamav version: 0.102.2
hello qmailtoaster-list
yesterday I found freshclam saying
|WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
|WARNING: Local version: 0.101.4 Recommended v
hello qmailtoaster-list
yesterday I found freshclam saying
|WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
|WARNING: Local version: 0.101.4 Recommended version: 0.102.2
but at
ftp://ftp.qmailtoaster.org/pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/7/testing/x86_64/
clamav-0.101.4-10.qt.el7.x86_64.rpm
looks latest.
How c
