On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The failure I was getting was that the listener was expecting 10
messages but was getting only 5 or 3 instead. What it looks like is
that notify is just a bit faster than notifyAll, and the way this
test was running, the difference added up
Java Client fails to compile due to removed MINA classes
Key: QPID-126
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-126
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-126?page=comments#action_12452254 ]
Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-126:
---
This *might* be related to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
The diff link in the MINA email is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-126?page=all ]
Marnie McCormack updated QPID-126:
--
Might relate to this MINA JIRA (though no details of resolution so not sure):
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-291
Emailed MINA dev list to ask
All,
Been trying to dig out the email I sent about this recently - but lost in
the mist :-(
In lieu of that, posting briefly to clarify discussions around the java
client code and JDK 1.4. IIRC we discussed this previously on the list and
agreed to use the retrotranslator to back-build a 1.4
On Nov 23, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Robert Greig wrote:
On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The failure I was getting was that the listener was expecting 10
messages but was getting only 5 or 3 instead. What it looks like is
that notify is just a bit faster than notifyAll, and the
Steve,
I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the
Mina team can also commit to producing at least a beta release in the
next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue
with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes
I fully agree.
On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Steve,
I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's
unless the
Mina team can also commit to producing at least a beta release in
the
next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot
