[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517274
]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
Should we now be looking to use the new 2.0 version of mina , now that it is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=comments#action_12456749 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
Upgraded to 1.0.1 but we really want 1.2 SNAPSHOT as this is a Java5 build.
Implement Mina API changes
Steve,
I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the
Mina team can also commit to producing at least a beta release in the
next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue
with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes
I fully agree.
On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Steve,
I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's
unless the
Mina team can also commit to producing at least a beta release in
the
next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=comments#action_12450060 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
Changes awaiting M1 Branching
Implement Mina API changes
--
Key: QPID-92
