I am taking this back , After problems with phonon and trying to understand
how to compile and fix things in qtjambi I decidet to rather swith to
gstreamer-java and in the future probably to eclipse e4/swt for ui if there
will be no good c++ maintainer ho will take qtjambi developement. I would
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Rene innus...@gmail.com wrote:
I am taking this back , After problems with phonon and trying to understand
how to compile and fix things in qtjambi I decidet to rather swith to
gstreamer-java and in the future probably to eclipse e4/swt for ui if there
will be
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
On Wednesday 09 of September 2009 10:00:17 José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
wrote:
Hmm, this maybe adds that jui .javas into build.
idadd-source/id
On Wednesday 09 of September 2009 07:12:28 José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
wrote:
I can recommend this plugin to maven for the autogeneration of the juics:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/juic-mvn-plugin/
Uhh, very good news for me. I am testing it now, but I have a following
problem:
On Wednesday 09 of September 2009 10:00:17 José Arcángel Salazar Delgado
wrote:
Hmm, this maybe adds that jui .javas into build.
idadd-source/id
phasegenerate-sources/ph
ase goals
Helge Fredriksen skrev:
Just to follow up my previous post, are you able to depict something
about coming technology changes in the Qt framework that might inflict
on the Jambi support for the upcoming Qt releases?
Hi, Helge.
If you mean whether it will be technically possible to support
Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
Helge Fredriksen skrev:
Just to follow up my previous post, are you able to depict something
about coming technology changes in the Qt framework that might
inflict on the Jambi support for the upcoming Qt releases?
Hi, Helge.
If you mean whether it will be
I also think that QTJAMBI have a chance , I personaly dont care much about
designer and special tools for exporting because coding gui in QTJAMBI is
very clean with small amount of code when doing well , thanks to css f.e.
and well designed api . I have used SWING in the past and for me it is
On Tuesday 08 of September 2009 10:40:30 Rene wrote:
As me as c++ and beginning java programer I should try to give some support
about it (when troll guys will stop working on it). Maybe people around
Ubuntu should help too, because they have created .deb packages from jambi
source ( which
On Tuesday 08 of September 2009 10:40:30 Rene wrote:
As me as c++ and beginning java programer I should try to give some support
about it (when troll guys will stop working on it). Maybe people around
Ubuntu should help too, because they have created .deb packages from jambi
source ( which
Hi,
Is good to hear that it is working out of the box in Eclipse. I have tried it
(eclipse + jambi integration ) few months ago, but I created only simple app
to see if it is working and reverted back to Netbeans, 'cause I hate Eclipse.
So I must created some simple scripts to hanlde jui and
G. Allegri wrote:
Is the Qt Jambi strong enough to give us a promising
future perspective?
Ok, easy questions for difficult answers... I need just a hint to avoid
investing on something that doesn't fit my skills.
There was a debate on this a few months back when Trolltech announced
On Monday 07 September 2009, Derek Fountain wrote:
G. Allegri wrote:
Is the Qt Jambi strong enough to give us a promising
future perspective?
Ok, easy questions for difficult answers... I need just a hint to avoid
investing on something that doesn't fit my skills.
There was a debate
I guess this will depend a bit upon how much changes one can foresee in
the Qt in the near future. As it is, I think Qt Jambi is great in it's
current state, thus if you are satisfied with the 4.5 or maybe 4.6
version of Qt, then the risk wouldn't be that high.
However, if major changes in
the Qt interface in it. The java bindings for KDE were often behind the
rest of the KDE bindings and was the work in the main of just one person
but I would not be so sure that it can not be done by the community if
there is a will and a small group of people to work with it.
Indeed. The
David Goodenough skrev:
Not quite sure this is true. You have to remember that things like juic
did not originate in Trolltech, but rather in the KDE community - I know
Just to be clear: The QtJava-bindings in KDE, which were made by Richard
Dale, were for Qt 3 and are licensed under the
I have huge experience with Swing and starting to get my experience
with Jambi (but already having some working project) I'll try to
answer main questions in few stages:
1. It depends on what you need. Swing is much closer to Java, it shows
you main Java OOAD concepts and allows you to get in MVC
Dear Eskil,
Just to follow up my previous post, are you able to depict something
about coming technology changes in the Qt framework that might inflict
on the Jambi support for the upcoming Qt releases?
Regards,
Helge Fredriksen
Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
David Goodenough skrev:
18 matches
Mail list logo
