Re: [Qt5-feedback] Fast IPC for Qt5?

2011-06-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 14.06.2011 02:16, andrew.stanley-jo...@nokia.com wrote: This is continuing the same discussion Ville, Thiago and I had in January 2011 about this topic. So I'll skip all the arguments that were made then, and jump to the crux of the mater. For an idea of data rates, the request then

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Fast IPC for Qt5?

2011-06-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 14.06.2011 21:09, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em Tuesday, 14 de June de 2011, às 20:55:08, Peter Kümmel escreveu: Reading majority of use cases I wonder why it is not used by QtCreator? Is this only due to the release of SFW after starting QtCeator development, are are there also technical

Re: [Qt5-feedback] SWF, IPC, QtService...

2011-06-14 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 14.06.2011 21:52, BRM wrote: Starting a new thread so as not to hijack the other one... - Original Message From: Peter Kümmelsyntheti...@gmx.net On 14.06.2011 21:09, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em Tuesday, 14 de June de 2011, às 20:55:08, Peter Kümmel escreveu: Reading majority

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Hi Till, good to know there are others who are skeptical about QML. But the QWidget time is over at Nokia. Someone else has to care about. I assume at Nokia the briefing is we will not waste any time or money for QWidget like stuff, someone else should do. But we are accustomed to rely on

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-09 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 08.10.2011 16:11, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 00:00:08 Daniel Mendizabal wrote: - Applications oriented to productivity, utilities, etc. with the only requirement to have the feel and look from the underlying OS and theme will also possibly need more complex

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-09 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 09.10.2011 11:31, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 10:38:51 Peter Kümmel wrote: Duck typing? Is there any mechanism in QML that guaranties that no run-time errors will happen when the QML script is interpreted? Qt5 will introduce static type checking for signal

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-09 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 09.10.2011 12:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 11:49:48 Peter Kümmel wrote: But I have the impression nobody wanna here any critic of QML. Seems all the Trolls have become SCRIPT-KIDDIES, which don't wanna see the advantage of static typed languages. And it seems

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-09 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 09.10.2011 11:41, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 11:31:30 schrieb Thiago Macieira: On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 10:38:51 Peter Kümmel wrote: Duck typing? Is there any mechanism in QML that guaranties that no run-time errors will happen when the QML script

Re: [Qt5-feedback] Concern about removal of QWidget classes

2011-10-10 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 10.10.2011 22:22, Frans Klaver wrote: people think the priorities are wrong. That's the point: Priority for Desktop is very low at Nokia. We all see it, feel it, any many old-school desktop develors don't like it. Peter ___ Qt5-feedback