On 08.10.2011 16:11, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Sunday, 9 de October de 2011 00:00:08 Daniel Mendizabal wrote: >> - Applications oriented to productivity, utilities, etc. with the only >> requirement to have the feel and look from the underlying OS and theme will >> also possibly need more complex routines and the classical approach >> (QWidget/C++) would be much more suitable. > > What data do you have to base your conclusion that QWidget / C++ is more > suitable? >
Duck typing? Is there any mechanism in QML that guaranties that no run-time errors will happen when the QML script is interpreted? Qt5 will introduce static type checking for signal/slots-connects so no connect could fail at run-time. But with interpreting QML at run-time all the static checks of connects seems worthless when QML is used, because much more errors could be introduced by the QML script. Peter > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt5-feedback mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
