ary 11, 2018 8:49 PM
> To: Muneer Kolarkunnu <abdul.kolarku...@oracle.com>
> Cc: quality-discuss@openjdk.java.net; Rory O'Donnell
> <rory.odonn...@oracle.com>; Dalibor Topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com>
> Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available
>
<abdul.kolarku...@oracle.com>
Cc: quality-discuss@openjdk.java.net; Rory O'Donnell
<rory.odonn...@oracle.com>; Dalibor Topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu
<abdul.kolarku...@or
On 23/11/2017 09:23, dalibor topic wrote:
On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated
system sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
No objections from me, as long as it is configured
On 22.11.2017 21:44, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated system
sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
No objections from me, as long as it is configured to send mail for
tagged builds (as Oracle
Volker,
We added Note 3 to http://download.java.net/openjdk/testresults/10/
earlier this week, we should have updated the "howto" also, will get
that done shortly.
We are still evaluating the most suitable hotspot test group(s), bear
with us while we get this sorted.
Rgds,Rory
On
Hi Dalibor,
That's a really good idea. Any objections to having an automated system
sign up to this mailing list and posting on a regular schedule?
Cheers,
Martijn
On 22 November 2017 at 13:35, dalibor topic
wrote:
> Thanks, Martijn - the relevant link for the test
Hi all,
I'm partly on holiday this week but will get back to all of you with the
straw man we had come up with a few FOSDEM's ago on how we could tackle this
Cheers,
Martijn
On 17 January 2017 at 21:49, Jonathan Gibbons
wrote:
> If someone can collect the
If someone can collect the different sets of jtreg output, there's a
related utility called "jtdiff" that can be used to generate combined
reports. It can compare either full work directories, or the
report/text/summary.txt files. The latter may be sufficient in this case.
-- Jon
On
Hello,
I'm Stuart Monteith in Linaro, working on OpenJDK on ARM's 64-bit
Aarch64 platform. We currently publish aarch64 testing results to the
aarch64-port-dev mailing list and host results on
http://openjdk.linaro.org/ . What I would find useful would be a means
to collate results across
Is this improvising the existing build farm already on Cloudbees or setting
up a whole new one.
Why is the choice Jenkins, any rationale behind it?
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:08 Martijn Verburg, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for
Hi all,
The LJC has plans to do this with a small build farm for some of the more
common platforms. This will be for R and academic research purposes only.
If you have OpenJDK / Jenkins build experience and would like to help then
please let me know!
Cheers,
Martijn
On 13 January 2017 at
k.java.net
Subject: Re: JDK 9 build 151 test results now available
On 12/01/2017 19:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu mailto:abdul.kolarku...@oracle.com; \nabdul.kolarku...@oracle.com> wrote:
pass fail java/util/c
On 12/01/2017 19:51, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu
> wrote:
pass fail java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java
---fail
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Muneer Kolarkunnu <
abdul.kolarku...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> pass fail java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java
>
> ---fail java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase.java#id1
>
I'm maintaining java/util/concurrent/tck/JSR166TestCase, but there is no
14 matches
Mail list logo