Hello,
will the Fedora Modularity Project [1] have a positive effect on Dom0? Will
modularity improve the situation with outdated Fedora Dom0 versions?
[1] https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/2017 10:19 PM, Paras Chetal wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote:
>> The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows:
>
>> Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02
>
>> Summary:
>
>> 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/2017 10:19 PM, Paras Chetal wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote:
>> The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows:
>
>> Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02
>
>> Summary:
>
>> 1.
In its base state, dmenu in Qubes can only reference Dom0 programs and
application shortcuts, which is somewhat awkward to use quickly.
I wrote a wrapper script which uses dmenu_path and a few of the qvm tools
to allow you to choose which AppVM dmenu runs for. To maintain Qubes's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote:
> The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows:
>
> Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02
>
> Summary:
>
> 1. libqubes-rpc-filcopy fuzz target is running on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/04/2017 12:28 AM, Rusty Bird wrote:
> Hi Patrik!
>
> I just noticed that qubes-devel seems to break your PGP/MIME
> signatures. Inline PGP works better on Google Groups based mailing
> lists. (The CCs have all been fine, of course.)
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 03:28:08AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Hello all, another progress report for ya!
>
> No screenshots this week, only cold hard code. Formatting and all that
> on the blog:
Hello all, another progress report for ya!
No screenshots this week, only cold hard code. Formatting and all that
on the blog: https://blog.amorgan.xyz/gsoc-weekly-progress-report-5.html
Otherwise text-only is below:
---
Hello again! Quick report here due to only a few days since the last one.
On 07/04/2017 12:09 AM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 10:39 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>> On 07/03/2017 10:00 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2017 08:09 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:47:49PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Hey marek,
>
On 07/03/2017 10:39 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On 07/03/2017 10:00 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>> On 07/03/2017 08:09 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:47:49PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
Hey marek,
>>>
Yep, that looks to be the case, however overriding
10 matches
Mail list logo