[qubes-devel] Fedora Modularity Projekt positive effect on Dom0?

2017-07-04 Thread je
Hello, will the Fedora Modularity Project [1] have a positive effect on Dom0? Will modularity improve the situation with outdated Fedora Dom0 versions? [1] https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group.

[qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Progress report #2: Analyzing the qubes code base

2017-07-04 Thread Paras Chetal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/04/2017 10:19 PM, Paras Chetal wrote: > On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote: >> The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows: > >> Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02 > >> Summary: > >> 1.

[qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Progress report #2: Analyzing the qubes code base

2017-07-04 Thread Paras Chetal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/04/2017 10:19 PM, Paras Chetal wrote: > On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote: >> The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows: > >> Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02 > >> Summary: > >> 1.

[qubes-devel] [i3wm] Allowing i3's dmenu to work within each AppVM

2017-07-04 Thread Albert Mokrejs
In its base state, dmenu in Qubes can only reference Dom0 programs and application shortcuts, which is somewhat awkward to use quickly. I wrote a wrapper script which uses dmenu_path and a few of the qvm tools to allow you to choose which AppVM dmenu runs for. To maintain Qubes's

[qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Progress report #2: Analyzing the qubes code base

2017-07-04 Thread Paras Chetal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/03/2017 02:23 AM, Paras Chetal wrote: > The progress report since the last time I posted is as follows: > > Blog post: https://paraschetal.in/gsoc-progress-report02 > > Summary: > > 1. libqubes-rpc-filcopy fuzz target is running on

Re: [qubes-devel] [GSoC] Progress report: Anti Evil Maid enhancements

2017-07-04 Thread Patrik Hagara
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/04/2017 12:28 AM, Rusty Bird wrote: > Hi Patrik! > > I just noticed that qubes-devel seems to break your PGP/MIME > signatures. Inline PGP works better on Google Groups based mailing > lists. (The CCs have all been fine, of course.) Thanks

Re: [qubes-devel] [GSoC] Qubes-MIME-Handlers Weekly Progress Report #5

2017-07-04 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 03:28:08AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote: > Hello all, another progress report for ya! > > No screenshots this week, only cold hard code. Formatting and all that > on the blog:

[qubes-devel] [GSoC] Qubes-MIME-Handlers Weekly Progress Report #5

2017-07-04 Thread Andrew Morgan
Hello all, another progress report for ya! No screenshots this week, only cold hard code. Formatting and all that on the blog: https://blog.amorgan.xyz/gsoc-weekly-progress-report-5.html Otherwise text-only is below: --- Hello again! Quick report here due to only a few days since the last one.

[qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Qubes-MIME-Handlers Weekly Progress Report #4

2017-07-04 Thread Andrew Morgan
On 07/04/2017 12:09 AM, Andrew Morgan wrote: > On 07/03/2017 10:39 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >> On 07/03/2017 10:00 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >>> On 07/03/2017 08:09 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:47:49PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote: > Hey marek, >

[qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Qubes-MIME-Handlers Weekly Progress Report #4

2017-07-04 Thread Andrew Morgan
On 07/03/2017 10:39 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: > On 07/03/2017 10:00 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote: >> On 07/03/2017 08:09 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:47:49PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote: Hey marek, >>> Yep, that looks to be the case, however overriding