On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:30:37AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > As for Qubes 3.2.1 - exactly as Reg said - it's blocked on 4.9 kernel
> > > testing.
> > does it not make sense to anyone else that at the least the testing
> > image should also be released to get more eyes on it
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:28:18AM +0200, Outback Dingo wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Reg Tiangha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:28:18AM +0200, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote:
> > On 2017-06-19 1:32 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Packages are in testing repository - just
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:08:00AM +0200, Outback Dingo wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:08:00AM +0200, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15,
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:39:08PM -0600, Reg Tiangha wrote:
>> On 06/15/2017 05:12 PM, pixel fairy wrote:
>> > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 05:39:08PM -0600, Reg Tiangha wrote:
> On 06/15/2017 05:12 PM, pixel fairy wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:50:31 AM UTC-7, Reg Tiangha wrote:
> >
> >
> > We're still stuck with FC23 in dom0 though, although
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:50:31 AM UTC-7, Reg Tiangha wrote:
>
>
> We're still stuck with FC23 in dom0 though, although you could attempt
> to build an ISO that uses FC24 or FC25 in dom0; some people have. It's
> unsupported though and you're on your own when it comes to compiling
>
On 06/15/2017 10:59 AM,
rmjiyz...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> It seems irresponsible to offer 3.2 as the latest stable version. It
> is outdated, since it was released there were many critical
> vulnerabilities in templates (apt bug for Debian-based templates),
> Fedora 23 is not supported anymore,