Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 14 October 2017 at 15:45, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki < > marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > >

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Andrew Clausen
Hi Marek, On 14 October 2017 at 17:06, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki < marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On 14 October 2017 at 15:45, Marek

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: qubes-url-redirector

2017-10-14 Thread joeviocoe
Thanks for the instructions. At first it would not load as an unpacked extension because manifest.json and other references to polyfill.js. Your git does not include polyfill.js. So I got one from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GoogleChrome/inert-polyfill/master/inert-polyfill.js Now,

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Leo Gaspard
On 10/14/2017 06:06 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:> Changing it to have root filesystem at the end would ease resizing, but > may introduce compatibility issues explained before. Most likely a stupid / already thought of before idea, but... as, to migrate from Qubes 3.2 to Qubes 4.0, it

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Andrew Clausen
Hi Leo, On 14 October 2017 at 22:42, Leo Gaspard wrote: > On 10/14/2017 06:06 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:> Changing it > to have root filesystem at the end would ease resizing, but > > may introduce compatibility issues explained before. > > Most likely a stupid /

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Andrew Clausen
Hi Marek, On 14 October 2017 at 15:45, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki < marma...@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 04:01:11PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 03:36:05PM +0200, Marek

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: qubes-url-redirector

2017-10-14 Thread 'Raffaele Florio' via qubes-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I've just uploaded the repo with installation istructions. Yeah I read that method. However I don't consider it suitable for browsers, as you can read from aforesaid motivations. Before update [0], if an user opens a whitelisted URL and the

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 05:42:39AM +0100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Hi all, > > On 14 October 2017 at 01:20, Wojtek Porczyk > wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Wojtek Porczyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 05:42:39AM +0100, Andrew Clausen wrote: > Hi all, > > On 14 October 2017 at 01:20, Wojtek Porczyk > wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Wojtek Porczyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 03:36:05PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > This should be enough for the online resize part. Now, back to the main > issue here: partition to resize isn't the last one, one need to

Re: [qubes-devel] Re: Template's root volume partition table in Qubes 4.0

2017-10-14 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 04:01:11PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 03:36:05PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation. > > This should be enough for the online resize part. Now, back to the main