iscussion groups
intentionally unclear, Drew!
In short, always err on the side of "too much information" rather than
too little.
Cheers,
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
All email from me is digitally signed, http://www.sungate.co.uk/
GPG key updated Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday, 29.09.2016 at 18:01 -0700, Drew White wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 September 2016 17:41:23 UTC+10, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > There is no commonly-accepted definition of 'version' with regard to
> > Windows, only &
should explain
what that definition is. Shouting at people - expecting them to
understand you - won't help.
You need to *ask a better question* rather than insulting the person
answering.
(etc.)
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
All email from me is digital
efrain from answering my questions with details that don't
> answer anything. If the website had the information, I would not be
> asking.
It sounds like the web site *does* include the information, you failed
to find it (or didn't look), someone answered by pointing you at the
right inform
d therefore more identifiable if
there's a compromise. Not an issue for me, but may be a concern for
some.]
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart
All email from me is digitally signed, http://www.sungate.co.uk/
GPG key updated Jan 2013 see http://www.sungate.co.uk/gpg
F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Saturday, 03.09.2016 at 19:50 +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 06:40:46PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> > On Friday, 02.09.2016 at 12:17 -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> >
> > > As
t to install
3.1 only to consider 3.2 almost immediately afterwards.
Given the EOL for Qubes 3.0, is the recommended "upgrade to a newer
release before 2016-09-09" really recommending the 3.2 release
candidate?
Cheers,
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk, http://twitter.com/DaveEwart