On 08/21/2018 11:39 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> SGX is another ME service slash intel marketing gimmick invented for DRM
> not security.
>
> If the person who purchased the computer can't examine the VM's running
> on it then they are not owning it simply licensing it which is why SGX
> is a bad
SGX is another ME service slash intel marketing gimmick invented for DRM
not security.
If the person who purchased the computer can't examine the VM's running
on it then they are not owning it simply licensing it which is why SGX
is a bad technology and people shouldn't buy x86.
--
You received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2018-08-20 20:19, jonbrownmaste...@gmail.com wrote:
> So the new Foreshadow exploit bypasses all Intel CPU protections
> even secure enclaves SGX promised to solve. Additionally it
> bypasses all VM protections. Check it out below:
>
>
So the new Foreshadow exploit bypasses all Intel CPU protections even secure
enclaves SGX promised to solve. Additionally it bypasses all VM protections.
Check it out below:
https://foreshadowattack.eu/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
