Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

Original Message >On 2017年1月21日 02:24, Антон Чехов wrote: >I tried again with the existing template, recompiled but the result stayed the >same. So I did try from scratch, including the modified coldkernel.config. >Everything is working so far, also behind a proxyVM. I did stop

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:33:30 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-01-19 10:30 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:11:19 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >>> Ah, okay. Mine don't start anymore. They jump from green to yellow but > >>> the AppVM and templateVM

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:11:19 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > > Ah, okay. Mine don't start anymore. They jump from green to yellow but the > > AppVM and templateVM don't start anymore. So I can't change anything in the > > template anymore which makes it unusable. > > I did everything

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 2017-01-19 10:30 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:11:19 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> Ah, okay. Mine don't start anymore. They jump from green to yellow but the >>> AppVM and templateVM don't start anymore. So I can't change anything in the >>> template anymore

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 2017-01-19 9:43 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-01-19 9:39 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: >> On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 5:25:00 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> On 2017-01-19 9:18 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 5:35:53 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 5:43:56 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-01-19 9:39 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 5:25:00 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> On 2017-01-19 9:18 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 5:35:53 PM UTC+1, Reg

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 5:25:00 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-01-19 9:18 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 5:35:53 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> On 2017-01-18 7:14 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I am testing coldkernel and I have a

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 2017-01-19 9:18 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 5:35:53 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> On 2017-01-18 7:14 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am testing coldkernel and I have a few questions. Does or should it work >>> with a vpn gateway? Do I have to change

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 5:35:53 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 2017-01-18 7:14 AM, Антон Чехов wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am testing coldkernel and I have a few questions. Does or should it work > > with a vpn gateway? Do I have to change some config file or special > >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Friday, January 13, 2017 at 12:21:50 PM UTC-5, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:11:29PM -0600, Colin Childs wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 13/01/17 11:52 AM, Colin Childs wrote: > On 13/01/17 11:21 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:11:29PM -0600, Colin Childs wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >> >>> Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing >>> of coldkernel on Debian is

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 13/01/17 11:21 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:11:29PM -0600, Colin Childs wrote: >> Hi everyone, > >> Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing >> of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most recent >> issue

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:11:29PM -0600, Colin Childs wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing > of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most recent > issue from foppe, and

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

2016-12-14 23:33 GMT+08:00 Reg Tiangha : > On 12/14/2016 06:03 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > To clarify: this has to be done in every template in which you want to > use this? Or can I just copy the whole dir after compiling (seems necessary > for the make install-deb

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

Reg Tiangha: > On 2016-12-19 3:20 PM, Doug Hill wrote: >> >> Thanks for the tip, Marek... The process moved a bit farther along... >> >> I believe I hit the gcc issue that was mentioned eariler; a few >> meaningful-looking snippets are below. Any thoughts are >> appreciated! >> >> >> >> >> CC

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 2016-12-19 3:20 PM, Doug Hill wrote: > > Thanks for the tip, Marek... The process moved a bit farther along... > > I believe I hit the gcc issue that was mentioned eariler; a few > meaningful-looking snippets are below. Any thoughts are > appreciated! > > > > > CC [M] fs/ncpfs/ioctl.o >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 04:34:39PM +, Doug Hill wrote: > > >> Colin Childs: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing >>> of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most recent >>> issue

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 04:34:39PM +, Doug Hill wrote: > > > Colin Childs: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing > > of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

Colin Childs: > Hi everyone, > > Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing > of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most recent > issue from foppe, and will be attempting to reproduce later this evening. > > If you run into issues that require

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 17/12/16 01:42 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/17/2016 11:47 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: >> On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 7:40:25 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> On 12/17/2016 10:36 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's recipe, same issue.

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 8:42:19 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/17/2016 11:47 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 7:40:25 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> On 12/17/2016 10:36 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > >>> I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/17/2016 11:47 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 7:40:25 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> On 12/17/2016 10:36 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: >>> I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's recipe, same issue. >>> Comparing boot logs, the problem seems to start here:

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Saturday, December 17, 2016 at 7:40:25 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/17/2016 10:36 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's recipe, same issue. > > Comparing boot logs, the problem seems to start here: > > > > [0.765662] BUG: unable to handle

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/17/2016 10:36 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's recipe, same issue. > Comparing boot logs, the problem seems to start here: > > [0.765662] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 87ff95a17300 > [0.765671] IP: []

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

I also built the fedora kernel according to Reg's recipe, same issue. Comparing boot logs, the problem seems to start here: [0.765662] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 87ff95a17300 [0.765671] IP: [] delay_mwaitx+0x49/0x90 [0.765682] PGD 0 [0.765688] Oops:

Re: [qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 10:11:31 PM UTC+1, Colin Childs wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Sorry for not getting on this list sooner, however it looks like testing > of coldkernel on Debian is largely going well! I see the most recent > issue from foppe, and will be attempting to reproduce later

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/15/2016 09:48 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/15/2016 09:43 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: >> On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:15:20 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> On 12/15/2016 06:01 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: On 12/15/2016 05:00 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/15/2016 09:43 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:15:20 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> On 12/15/2016 06:01 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: >>> On 12/15/2016 05:00 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a fresh d8 template, updated it and built

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 2:15:20 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/15/2016 06:01 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > > On 12/15/2016 05:00 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > >> Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a fresh d8 template, updated it and built > >> kernel again to have a clean slate to work from.

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/15/2016 06:01 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/15/2016 05:00 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: >> Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a fresh d8 template, updated it and built >> kernel again to have a clean slate to work from. Everything builds, no error >> beside the expected ones afterwards. But when i

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/15/2016 05:00 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a fresh d8 template, updated it and built > kernel again to have a clean slate to work from. Everything builds, no error > beside the expected ones afterwards. But when i switch to pvgrub2 and boot, > it shuts down

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

Okay, stuck again. Downloaded a fresh d8 template, updated it and built kernel again to have a clean slate to work from. Everything builds, no error beside the expected ones afterwards. But when i switch to pvgrub2 and boot, it shuts down seconds after boot attempt. Full log attached.

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 4:02:31 PM UTC-7, Foppe de Haan wrote: > On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 11:19:45 PM UTC+1, rtia...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 2:22:57 PM UTC-7, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > > > > Thanks. When building this in d9-t, I get 'recipe

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 11:19:45 PM UTC+1, rtia...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 2:22:57 PM UTC-7, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > > Thanks. When building this in d9-t, I get 'recipe failed' "Error 2" pretty > > soon after starting the build process. No idea why, as

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 2:22:57 PM UTC-7, Foppe de Haan wrote: > Thanks. When building this in d9-t, I get 'recipe failed' "Error 2" pretty > soon after starting the build process. No idea why, as there is no log, and I > don't see an option to provide one (or to provide verbose

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 4:33:24 PM UTC+1, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/14/2016 06:03 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > To clarify: this has to be done in every template in which you want to use > > this? Or can I just copy the whole dir after compiling (seems necessary for > > the make

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/14/2016 06:03 AM, Foppe de Haan wrote: > To clarify: this has to be done in every template in which you want to use > this? Or can I just copy the whole dir after compiling (seems necessary for > the make install-deb step?), install whatever packages I need to perform the > post-build

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

To clarify: this has to be done in every template in which you want to use this? Or can I just copy the whole dir after compiling (seems necessary for the make install-deb step?), install whatever packages I need to perform the post-build steps, and perform those? (thinking of D8-template,

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/12/2016 10:41 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/11/2016 11:16 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> On 12/11/2016 06:01 PM, raahe...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for all your info. >>> >> A few last observations: >> >> - If you run coldkernel on a NetVM or ProxyVM, *nothing* will be able to >> connect

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/11/2016 11:16 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/11/2016 06:01 PM, raahe...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Thanks for all your info. >> > A few last observations: > > - If you run coldkernel on a NetVM or ProxyVM, *nothing* will be able to > connect behind it (which kind of sucks). > - Dropbox no

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/11/2016 06:01 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote: > > Thanks for all your info. > A few last observations: - If you run coldkernel on a NetVM or ProxyVM, *nothing* will be able to connect behind it (which kind of sucks). - Dropbox no longer launches and it keeps trying to download the daemon

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Sunday, December 11, 2016 at 7:45:09 PM UTC-5, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/11/2016 05:20 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > > On 12/11/2016 06:21 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> On 12/10/2016 09:10 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> > >>> Ah, I see! > >>> > >>> OK, I think I may know what *might* have happened. >

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/11/2016 06:21 AM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/10/2016 09:10 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > >> Ah, I see! >> >> OK, I think I may know what *might* have happened. >> >> I think the make script did try to do what it said in the instructions >> here when it started to install the generated deb

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/10/2016 09:10 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > Ah, I see! > > OK, I think I may know what *might* have happened. > > I think the make script did try to do what it said in the instructions > here when it started to install the generated deb packages: > >

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/10/2016 08:42 PM, raahe...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'e had the problem of being green for a second and immediately turning > yellow with installing just a regular distro debian kernel with pvgrub. In > other words the gui is not working, but you can verify the kernel is booting > properly

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Saturday, December 10, 2016 at 10:24:47 PM UTC-5, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/10/2016 05:40 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > > > Well, I'm currently in the middle of compiling it; haven't had to > > compile a kernel since my Gentoo days and I've forgotten how long it > > used to take. One piece of

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On Saturday, December 10, 2016 at 10:24:47 PM UTC-5, Reg Tiangha wrote: > On 12/10/2016 05:40 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > > > Well, I'm currently in the middle of compiling it; haven't had to > > compile a kernel since my Gentoo days and I've forgotten how long it > > used to take. One piece of

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/10/2016 05:40 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: > Well, I'm currently in the middle of compiling it; haven't had to > compile a kernel since my Gentoo days and I've forgotten how long it > used to take. One piece of advice at this point: If you're using a fresh > template, you'll definitely want to

[qubes-users] Re: FYI: Experimental Qubes coldkernel support now available

On 12/10/2016 03:06 PM, Chris Laprise wrote: > On 12/10/2016 03:36 PM, Reg Tiangha wrote: >> I haven't tried it myself yet, but it looks like the coldkernel crew >> pushed out experimental support for Debian templates to one of their >> test branches yesterday: >> >>