Re: [qubes-users] Re: QSB-089: Qrexec: Memory corruption in service request handling

2023-05-13 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:00:41PM -0700, Vít Šesták wrote: > If the process is not reused, just an update without restarting anything is > enough, isn't it? (This wouldn't be the case if the process was forking > from a zygote.) The process

Re: [qubes-users] Re: QSB-089: Qrexec: Memory corruption in service request handling

2023-05-12 Thread Andrew David Wong
On 5/11/23 11:00 PM, Vít Šesták wrote: > If the process is not reused, just an update without restarting anything is > enough, isn't it? (This wouldn't be the case if the process was forking > from a zygote.) Marek has previously told me that only Xen and Kernel updates require a reboot. FWIW,

[qubes-users] Re: QSB-089: Qrexec: Memory corruption in service request handling

2023-05-12 Thread Vít Šesták
If the process is not reused, just an update without restarting anything is enough, isn't it? (This wouldn't be the case if the process was forking from a zygote.) After the update, I got a shower of notifications “Failed to execute qubes.WindowIconUdater (from to dom0)”, probably for each