Re: [qubes-users] Signal app doesn't start (Fedora)

2020-08-22 Thread Steve Coleman
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:50 PM 'Crowphale' via qubes-users < qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Sorry for stupid question, but how do I start Signal (or any app) from > terminal? Is there some qvm-* command? Or how do I find the Signal binary? > > I have not installed signal but I'll at leas

Re: [qubes-users] Signal app doesn't start (Fedora)

2020-08-22 Thread 'Crowphale' via qubes-users
Sorry for stupid question, but how do I start Signal (or any app) from terminal? Is there some qvm-* command? Or how do I find the Signal binary? Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 20, 2020 2:11 PM, Qubes wrote: > On 8/20/20 7:50 PM, 'Crowp

[qubes-users] Re: Unable to installes mirage-firewall: this version of runc doesn't work on cgroups v2

2020-08-22 Thread 54th Parallel
On Sunday, 23 August 2020 at 07:51:11 UTC+8 one7...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install mirage-fw with a Fedora-32 Build-AppVM and run into > the following error: > > OCI runtime create failed: this version of runc doesn't work on cgroups > v2: unknown > [...] > Any ideas how to

[qubes-users] Unable to installes mirage-firewall: this version of runc doesn't work on cgroups v2

2020-08-22 Thread 799
Hello, I'm trying to install mirage-fw with a Fedora-32 Build-AppVM and run into the following error: OCI runtime create failed: this version of runc doesn't work on cgroups v2: unknown Steps to reproduce: MirageFWBuildVM=my-mirage-buildvm TemplateVM=fedora-32 MirageFWAppVM=sys-mirage-fw See a

Re: [qubes-users] sys-firewall based on debian-10-minimal not recognized

2020-08-22 Thread unman
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:01:54AM -0700, 54th Parallel wrote: > On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote: > > > I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on > > debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on > > brand-spanking-new installations

Re: [qubes-users] sys-firewall based on debian-10-minimal not recognized

2020-08-22 Thread 54th Parallel
On Saturday, 22 August 2020 at 18:57:22 UTC+8 Frank Schäckermann wrote: > I am not sure what you mean with „behind a vpn vm“. > > My setup is such that I have the sys-net VM which is used as network vm in > sys-firewall and a few sys-vpn-xxx. sys-firewall in turn is used as network > vm for all

Re: [qubes-users] sys-firewall based on debian-10-minimal not recognized

2020-08-22 Thread Frank
> On 22. Aug 2020, at 11:01, 54th Parallel wrote: >  >> On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote: >> I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on >> debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on >> brand-spanking-new installations (plural) bein

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Announcement: New community forum for Qubes OS users!

2020-08-22 Thread 54th Parallel
On Saturday, 22 August 2020 at 17:37:24 UTC+8 Qubes wrote: > > Yes a big difference, but the two are intertwined in ways that it is > impossible to separate them. If you believe an operating system from > Google, Microsoft, Apple, or any other tech giant, provides > "near-absolute" security I t

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Announcement: New community forum for Qubes OS users!

2020-08-22 Thread Qubes
There's a difference between privacy and security. Chrome OS provides security (near-absolute security, some might say) but obviously little privacy is to be expected. Yes a big difference, but the two are intertwined in ways that it is impossible to separate them. If you believe an operati

Re: [qubes-users] sys-firewall based on debian-10-minimal not recognized

2020-08-22 Thread 54th Parallel
On Friday, 21 August 2020 at 16:58:48 UTC+8 54th Parallel wrote: > I'm having the same issue with disposable firewalls built on > debian-10-minimal, with the minimum amount of packages, on > brand-spanking-new installations (plural) being unreliable firewalls. They > sometimes function but not