Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes silently ditches Librem

2017-07-13 Thread baldric
day! https://tutanota.com 12. Jul 2017 02:41 by a...@qubes-os.org: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2017-07-11 14:36, baldric-q7wo9g+UVklWk0Htik3J/> w...@public.gmane.org> > wrote: >> Chris Laprise: >>> On 07/10/2017 10:56 AM, Unman wrote: >

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes silently ditches Librem

2017-07-11 Thread baldric-q7wo9g+UVklWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org
Chris Laprise: > On 07/10/2017 10:56 AM, Unman wrote: >> This simply isn't true - it's clear from the Purism statement that Librem >> 13v2 has not been entered for certification. >> >> Since Qubes 4 is still at an early stage of development (not even RC1), >> there is little prospect of ANY machine

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes silently ditches Librem

2017-07-11 Thread baldric-q7wo9g+UVklWk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org
Chris Laprise: > On 07/10/2017 10:56 AM, Unman wrote: >> This simply isn't true - it's clear from the Purism statement that Librem >> 13v2 has not been entered for certification. >> >> Since Qubes 4 is still at an early stage of development (not even RC1), >> there is little prospect of ANY machine

[qubes-users] Qubes silently ditches Librem

2017-07-08 Thread baldric
For those of us who followed Qubes hardware recommendations and then bought or ordered shiny new Librem 13 laptops, you'll maybe not have noticed  that qubes has silently and sneakily withdrawn the recommendation leaving us all in the lurch. Originally qubes was sold to as all as a reasonably se